The Wires
powered by Surfing Waves
The Ledes

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

New York Times: “Brian Wilson, who as the leader and chief songwriter of the Beach Boys became rock’s poet laureate of surf-and-sun innocence, but also an embodiment of damaged genius through his struggles with mental illness and drugs, has died. He was 82.” ~~~

Help!

To keep the Conversation going, please help me by linking news articles, opinion pieces and other political content in today's Comments section.

Link Code:   <a href="URL">text</a>

OR here's a link generator. The one I had posted died, then Akhilleus found one, but it too bit the dust. He found yet another, which I've linked here, and as of September 23, 2024, it's working.

OR you can always just block, copy and paste to your comment the URL (Web address) of the page you want to link.

Note for Readers. It is not possible for commenters to "throw" their highlighted links to another window. But you can do that yourself. Right-click on the link and a drop-down box will give you choices as to where you want to open the link: in a new tab, new window or new private window.

Thank you to everyone who has been contributing links to articles & other content in the Comments section of each day's "Conversation." If you're missing the comments, you're missing some vital links.

Marie: Sorry, my countdown clock was unreliable; then it became completely unreliable. I can't keep up with it. Maybe I'll try another one later.

 

Public Service Announcement

The Washington Post publishes a series of U.S. maps here to tell you what weather to expect in your area this summer in terms of temperatures, humidity, precipitation, and cloud cover. The maps compare this year's forecasts with 1993-2016 averages.

Zoë Schlanger in the Atlantic: "Throw out your black plastic spatula. In a world of plastic consumer goods, avoiding the material entirely requires the fervor of a religious conversion. But getting rid of black plastic kitchen utensils is a low-stakes move, and worth it. Cooking with any plastic is a dubious enterprise, because heat encourages potentially harmful plastic compounds to migrate out of the polymers and potentially into the food. But, as Andrew Turner, a biochemist at the University of Plymouth recently told me, black plastic is particularly crucial to avoid." This is a gift link from laura h.

Mashable: "Following the 2024 presidential election results and [Elon] Musk's support for ... Donald Trump, users have been deactivating en masse. And this time, it appears most everyone has settled on one particular X alternative: Bluesky.... Bluesky has gained more than 100,000 new sign ups per day since the U.S. election on Nov. 5. It now has over 15 million users. It's enjoyed a prolonged stay on the very top of Apple's App Store charts as well. Ready to join? Here's how to get started on Bluesky[.]"

CNN did a live telecast Saturday night (June 7) of the Broadway play "Good Night, and Good Luck," written by George Clooney and Grant Heslov, about legendary newsman Edward R. Murrow's effort to hold to account Sen. Joe McCarthy, "the junior senator from Wisconsin." Clooney plays Murrow. Here's Murrow himself with his famous take on McCarthy & McCarthyism, brief remarks that especially resonate today: ~~~

     ~~~ This article lists ways you still can watch the play. 

New York Times: “The New York Times Company has agreed to license its editorial content to Amazon for use in the tech giant’s artificial intelligence platforms, the company said on Thursday. The multiyear agreement 'will bring Times editorial content to a variety of Amazon customer experiences,' the news organization said in a statement. Besides news articles, the agreement encompasses material from NYT Cooking, The Times’s food and recipe site, and The Athletic, which focuses on sports. This is The Times’s first licensing arrangement with a focus on generative A.I. technology. In 2023, The Times sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, for copyright infringement, accusing the tech companies of using millions of articles published by The Times to train automated chatbots without any kind of compensation. OpenAI and Microsoft have rejected those accusations.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I have no idea what this means for "the Amazon customer experience." Does it mean that if I don't have a NYT subscription but do have Amazon Prime I can read NYT content? And where, exactly, would I find that content? I don't know. I don't know.

Washington Post reporters asked three AI image generators what a beautiful woman looks like. "The Post found that they steer users toward a startlingly narrow vision of attractiveness. Prompted to show a 'beautiful woman,' all three tools generated thin women, without exception.... Her body looks like Barbie — slim hips, impossible waist, round breasts.... Just 2 percent of the images showed visible signs of aging. More than a third of the images had medium skin tones. But only nine percent had dark skin tones. Asked to show 'normal women,' the tools produced images that remained overwhelmingly thin.... However bias originates, The Post’s analysis found that popular image tools struggle to render realistic images of women outside the Western ideal." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The reporters seem to think they are calling out the AI programs for being unrealistic. But there's a lot about the "beautiful women" images they miss. I find these omissions remarkably sexist. For one thing, the reporters seem to think AI is a magical "thing" that self-generates. It isn't. It's programmed. It's programmed by boys, many of them incels who have little or no experience or insights beyond comic books and Internet porn of how to gauge female "beauty." As a result, the AI-generated women look like cartoons; that is, a lot like an air-brushed photo of Kristi Noem: globs of every kind of dark eye makeup, Scandinavian nose, Botox lips, slathered-on skin concealer/toner/etc. makeup, long dark hair and the aforementioned impossible Barbie body shape, including huge, round plastic breasts. 

New York Times: “George Clooney’s Broadway debut, 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' has been one of the sensations of the 2024-25 theater season, breaking box office records and drawing packed houses of audiences eager to see the popular movie star in a timely drama about the importance of an independent press. Now the play will become much more widely available: CNN is planning a live broadcast of the penultimate performance, on June 7 at 7 p.m. Eastern. The performance will be preceded and followed by coverage of, and discussion about, the show and the state of journalism.”

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land. -- Magna Carta ~~~

~~~ New York Times: “Bought for $27.50 after World War II, the faint, water stained manuscript in the library of Harvard Law School had attracted relatively little attention since it arrived there in 1946. That is about to change. Two British academics, one of whom happened on the manuscript by chance, have discovered that it is an original 1300 version — not a copy, as long thought — of Magna Carta, the medieval document that helped establish some of the world’s most cherished liberties. It is one of just seven such documents from that date still in existence.... A 710-year-old version of Magna Carta was sold in 2007 for $21.3 million.... First issued in 1215, it put into writing a set of concessions won by rebellious barons from a recalcitrant King John of England — or Bad King John, as he became known in folklore. He later revoked the charter, but his son, Henry III, issued amended versions, the last one in 1225, and Henry’s son, Edward I, in turn confirmed the 1225 version in 1297 and again in 1300.”

NPR lists all of the 2025 Pulitzer Prize winners. Poynter lists the prizes awarded in journalism as well as the finalists in these categories.

Wherein Michael McIntyre explains how Americans adapted English to their needs. With examples:

 

Contact Marie

Email Marie at constantweader@gmail.com

Constant Comments

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts. — Anonymous

A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolvesEdward R. Murrow

Publisher & Editor: Marie Burns

I have a Bluesky account now. The URL is https://bsky.app/profile/marie-burns.bsky.social . When Reality Chex goes down, check my Bluesky page for whatever info I am able to report on the status of Reality Chex. If you can't access the URL, I found that I could Google Bluesky and ask for Marie Burns. Google will include links to accounts for people whose names are, at least in part, Maria Burns, so you'll have to tell Google you looking only for Marie.

Friday
Jun132025

The Conversation -- June 14, 2025

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0ab9b3f3ec4b89fde05e255467f2b3b1d89218f2d1e366f8722cf3e0923e622.png

By Pat Bagley of the Salt Lake Tribune. Thanks to RAS for the link.

~~~~~~~~~~

New York Times liveblog: “'A person pretending to be a police officer assassinated a Democratic state legislator in Minnesota and killed the lawmaker’s husband in “an act of targeted political violence,' Gov. Tim Walz said Saturday. The assailant also shot and injured another Democratic lawmaker and his wife, officials said. State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, died in the attack at their home in the Minneapolis suburbs. State Senator John A. Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were shot multiple times at their house in a nearby suburb, but remained alive as of Saturday morning. The authorities were searching for the assailant, who shot at officers as they arrived at one of the lawmakers’ homes. Chief Mark Bruley of the Brooklyn Park, Minn., police said the gunman’s vehicle contained a manifesto and a target list with names of individuals, including the two lawmakers who were shot.  'We must all, Minnesota and across the country, stand against all forms of political violence,' Mr. Walz said. F.B.I. officials said they had joined the investigation.” An AP report is here. Thank you RAS for the heads-up. T

~~~~~~~~~~

Be Careful Out There.

The Washington Post is live-updating developments related to today's protests. 

Marie: BTW, I found that the easiest way to locate protests in my area was to Google "No Kings" and the name of my state. The events were listed by town, in alpha order, and included some details, like time, place and focus of each event.

Adam Nagourney of the New York Times: “The nation is a cauldron of anxiety and anger as it enters the weekend at a moment recalling some of the darkest periods of its history.... Two things, many historians suggest, distinguish this moment from other troubled times in our past. The first is the sheer number of conflagrations taking place at once.... The second thing is Trump himself. At fraught moments like this, it normally falls to the president to step up as the reassuring figure.... Not Trump. When Gov. Gavin Newsom, Democrat of California, protested the dispatching of the National Guard to Los Angeles, the president responded by ordering even more members of the guard to the city, followed by a contingent of Marines. When told that the 'No Kings' weekend protests might spill into Washington on Saturday, Trump warned that anyone trying to interfere with his military parade, which coincides with his 79th birthday, will be met with 'a very big force.' 'What really stands out to me now is that the biggest source of chaos is the president himself,” said Julian Zelizer, a professor of political history at Princeton University.”

Sophia Solano & Martin Weil of the Washington Post: “U.S. Capitol Police arrested about 60 demonstrators Friday evening during a protest of the appearance of troops in Saturday’s Army celebration in Washington and at immigration protests in Los Angeles. Capitol Police said the arrests came after a bicycle-rack barrier was pushed down and a police line was 'illegally crossed' while demonstrators ran toward the steps leading to the Capitol Rotunda. The demonstrators, wearing fatigue clothing, then sat on the steps of the Capitol, behind a sign that read 'Vets Say Military off our Streets.' The 60 were part of a larger group that had been demonstrating peacefully at the Supreme Court, Capitol Police said. After they broke away and ran toward the Capitol steps, officers 'began making arrests,' police said.” A CBS News report is here.

Rhian Lubin of the Independent: “Far-right groups are sharing violent messages ahead of the 'No Kings” protests this weekend to coincide with ... Donald Trump’s military birthday parade. Accounts associated with extremist groups are also sharing detailed information about protest organizers, including names and where they work, The Wall Street Journal reports. Protests in more than 2,000 cities are scheduled to take place Saturday. 'Shoot a couple, the rest will go home,' one meme circulating on a Proud Boys Telegram channel said.... The Northern Illinois Proud Boys shared a meme on their Telegram channel falsely claiming the LAPD was seeking support from vigilantes ahead of the protests this weekend.... Experts on extremism in America are alarmed by the posts because they could inspire 'lone-actor violence' or persuade someone to 'get off the couch, pick up a gun and go out to one of these cities,' Jon Lewis ... [of] George Washington University ... told The Journal.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Could these "messengers" be some of the same Proud Boys whom Trump pardoned & released from jail? Why, yes, yes, they could be. ~~~

~~~ Madeline Sherratt of the Independent: “A Florida sheriff issued a stark message to protesters planning to demonstrate this weekend against increasing ICE arrests nationwide. Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey warned in a press conference Thursday..., 'If you throw a brick, a firebomb, or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will be notifying your family where to collect your remains, because we will kill you, graveyard dead. We’re not going to play.'...” MB: Obviously I don't think a person should throw a brick that damages property. But would I kill him for doing so? Absolutely not. And neither would a responsible law enforcement officer. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Chris Hayes ran clips last night of the Brevard County presser. After Sheriff Ivey threatened protesters, a county supervisor came to the mic & told folks that if a protester stood in front of your vehicle, run him over.

Peter Baker of the New York Times: “When ... [Donald] Trump first sought to stage a military parade in Washington, a four-star general ... [told] him that 'it’s what dictators do.' Mr. Trump was unbothered by the comparison, and so on Saturday tanks will roll down the streets of the nation’s capital for the first time in decades. Nor was Mr. Trump evidently concerned about being accused of authoritarian excess for deploying troops to Los Angeles to quell violent protests against his immigration crackdown. If anything, he seemed to revel in the moment, vowing to 'hit' anyone who so much as spit at a police officer.... Yet as a real war broke out this week in the Middle East, Mr. Trump seemed reluctant to get involved, declining to join Israel in its aerial blitz against Iran’s nuclear facilities despite years of chest-thumping threats of 'obliteration' against the Islamic regime.... He has ordered more troops to Los Angeles and Washington than he currently has stationed in Syria and Iraq combined. He seems more willing at the moment to use the military against Americans than against Iranians. He celebrates a show of force on U.S. soil even as he denounces 'endless wars' outside its borders.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Baker says Trump's relationship to the military is "complicated." I don't think so. He and his bro base are isolationists and racists. Their idea of "strength" is "owning the libs," quashing DEI & incarcerating people of color. Making the world safe for democracy? No way. That's not "complicated"; it's self-serving.

Dan Lamothe of the Washington Post: “Trump’s [partisan] rally [at Fort Bragg earlier this week] is the latest event since his return to office that has showcased the president’s disregard for civil-military norms and thrust the Army, specifically, to the center of his most partisan machinations. The turmoil has run headlong into Saturday’s 'grand parade' in Washington celebrating the Army’s 250th birthday, a display of its might — replete with tanks, helicopters, bands and thousands of troops in uniform — that has drawn withering criticism from Trump’s political opponents.... 'Make America Great Again' caps and other pro-Trump paraphernalia were made available for purchase during the event over the objections of Army officials, defense officials said. The merchandise booth, as reported earlier by Military.com, is now the focus of an Army investigation.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Since the story mentions Dan Driscoll, the Secretary of the Army, I guess we had better point out, as RAS did yesterday, that Secretary Dan is awfully proud of having recently spoken to "a soldier on the moon." As far as we mere members of the public know, there is no "soldier on the moon" nor has there been since 1972, more than a decade before Driscoll was born. Go to the videotape. Driscoll is also now the acting director of the ATF, so maybe he indulged in some extra-legal substance he found om the evidence room. 

Strawberry Fields, Abandoned ~~~

Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace. -- Donald Trump, on social media, Thursday ~~~ 

~~~ TACO. Hamed Aleaziz & Zolan Kanno-Youngs of the New York Times: “The Trump administration has abruptly shifted the focus of its mass deportation campaign, telling Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to largely pause raids and arrests in the agricultural industry, hotels and restaurants, according to an internal email and three U.S. officials with knowledge of the guidance. The decision suggested that the scale of ... [Donald] Trump’s mass deportation campaign — an issue that is at the heart of his presidency — is hurting industries and constituencies that he does not want to lose. The new guidance comes after protests in Los Angeles against the Trump administration’s immigration raids, including at farms and businesses. It also came as Mr. Trump made a rare concession this week that his crackdown was hurting American farmers and hospitality businesses. The guidance was sent on Thursday in an email by a senior ICE official, Tatum King, to regional leaders of the ICE department that generally carries out criminal investigations, including work site operations, known as Homeland Security Investigations. 'Effective today, please hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels,' he wrote in the message.” MB: Plus, I'd guess Eric told the old man that his cheesy resorts couldn't find cheap help. 

What privacy advocates warned could happen has happened: ~~~

⭐~~~ Kimberly Kindy & Amanda Seitz of the AP: “... Donald Trump’s administration this week provided deportation officials with personal data -- including the immigration status -- on millions of Medicaid enrollees, a move that could make it easier to locate people as part of his sweeping immigration crackdown. An internal memo and emails obtained by The Associated Press show that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully sought to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. Nevertheless, two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered the dataset handed over to the Department of Homeland Security, the emails show. Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the directive. Besides helping authorities locate migrants, experts said, the government could also use the information to scuttle the hopes of migrants seeking green cards, permanent residency or citizenship if they had ever obtained Medicaid benefits funded by the federal government. The dataset includes the information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C., all of which allow non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars. CMS transferred the information just as the Trump administration was ramping up its enforcement efforts in Southern California.” (Also linked yesterday.) 

April Rubin of Axios: "The U.S. military will not be responsible for law enforcement at Los Angeles protests, the Pentagon said on Friday.... Nearly 5,000 National Guard members and Marines were deployed by the Trump administration in response to anti-immigration raid protests, despite disapproval from a plurality of Americans. 'As of today, we have had no soldier or Marine detain anyone,' Maj. Gen. Thomas Sherman said during a Friday press briefing. 'They have watched federal law enforcement arrest personnel as they were protecting. They have not had to detain anyone at this point.'... Starting today, Second Battalion, Seventh Marines will be responsible for protecting federal property and personnel, Sherman said." 

Marie: The poet Robert Burns tells us what may happen to the best-laid plans (assuming you understand 18th-century Scottish dialect). But what about seat-of-the-pants, Trumpity "plans"? How do they fare? ~~~ 

~~~ Nicholas Slayton of Task & Purpose: "U.S. Marines temporarily detained a civilian in Los Angeles Friday afternoon, the first known case of the military doing so since it deployed to Los Angeles County. The incident was first reported by Reuters, who identified the detained man as U.S. Army veteran Marcos Leao. A spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command confirmed that an individual was detained, but turned over to law enforcement officials after approximately 10 minutes. He was transferred to the custody of officers from the Department of Homeland Security before being released. Per Reuters, Leao was on his way to the nearby Veterans Affairs campus when he crossed yellow tape at the Wilshire federal building, which Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment took over guarding this afternoon. Marines quickly detained him and restrained him using zip ties." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Rachel Parsons, et al., of the New York Times: “... the incident ... was noteworthy in one major way: Federal troops are rarely deployed on American soil and are rarely seen detaining U.S. civilians, even temporarily.... A 19th-century law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally makes it illegal to use federal troops for law enforcement on domestic soil.... The federal building [Mr. Leao was attempting to enter] is the same one where F.B.I. agents forcibly removed Senator Alex Padilla, Democrat of California, from a news conference on Thursday. The 17-story building includes offices for the F.B.I., the Veterans Affairs Department and a federal passport agency.”

Laura Romero & Katherine Faulders of ABC News: "Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty Friday to human smuggling charges, and the judge in case said she would wait to issue a decision on whether he should be released from custody pending trial. One week after he was brought back to the Unites States from detention in El Salvador, Abrego Garcia entered his not guilty plea at his arraignment in Tennessee, where federal prosecutors have charged him with transporting undocumented migrants within the U.S. in what they say was a conspiracy involving the domestic transport of thousands of noncitizens from Mexico and Central America, including some children, in exchange for thousands of dollars. Following his plea, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes heard arguments over whether he should continue to be detained, after which she said she would likely issue a written order in the near future -- 'soon rather than later,' she said." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Alan Feuer & James McGee of the New York Times: “A federal judge signaled on Friday that she was open to granting bail to Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, one week after he was returned to the United States to face criminal charges following his wrongful deportation to El Salvador. If the judge, Barbara D. Holmes, does end up denying the Justice Department’s request to detain Mr. Abrego Garcia as he awaits trial, it would be a significant rebuke of the Trump administration, which has repeatedly accused him of being a dangerous criminal, even a terrorist. But it would also represent a Pyrrhic victory for him and his defense team because, as Judge Holmes pointed out, he would almost certainly be taken into custody by immigration officials. Judge Holmes declined to make a final decision on the question of bail at a daylong hearing in Federal District Court in Nashville where Mr. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to a two-count federal indictment unsealed last Friday.”

Inae Oh of Mother Jones: "... to the right, [Kristi] Noem was the wrong[ed] party [in the incident in which law enforcement officers wrestled Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) to the floor and handcuffed him]. For them, the incident seems to have transformed her into something of a wounded dove.... 'She’s like the most delicate, beautiful, tiny woman,' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) said during an appearance on Benny Johnson’s podcast.... 'What actual testosterone dude goes in and tries to break Kristi Noem?'... [There is] glaring racism in the suggestion that Noem, a white woman, is the victim after a Latino man is physically dragged out of a room by multiple Secret Service agents. The pretext of criminality attached to people who are not white pervades this administration. Just this week, Rep. LaMonica McIver, a Black congresswoman from New Jersey, was indicted on charges of impeding and interfering with law enforcement officials after protesting at an ICE facility last month.... In these early days of our fascist slide, it is painfully clear who gets to be 'delicate, beautiful, and tiny,' and who is seen as a violent threat to law enforcement.”

Jonah Bromwich of the New York Times: “The Trump administration, blocked by a judge from detaining Mahmoud Khalil on one set of legal grounds, has officially shifted to another as it fights to hold him in federal custody. Justice Department lawyers told the judge, Michael E. Farbiarz, on Friday, that Mr. Khalil was being held on allegations that had been added to his case more than a week after his arrest in March. Judge Farbiarz has already suggested the allegations do not wholly explain his continued detention.... Justice Department lawyers wrote in a court filing submitted Friday afternoon that Mr. Khalil [now] was being held on the [later-added] allegations ... that he had failed to disclose his membership in certain organizations when he applied for legal residency in March 2024. Scott Schuchart, a former senior homeland security official, said the government’s shifting rationale in Mr. Khalil’s case was typical of the administration’s broader approach to immigration cases. 'I find it outrageous just with regard to the disrespect with which they’ve treated the court and the entire process throughout this case,' he said, adding, 'It shows nothing but contempt for the rule of law.'” (Also linked yesterday.) The NBC News story is here.

Say, remember how the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, and three Democratic members of congress wanted to inspect the privately-run migrant detention center known as Delaney Hall? And how DHS officers shoved them around and arrested the mayor, then the Trumpy prosecutor later brought federal charges against one of the House members ? Well, gosh, it's almost as if those planned inspections were not only legal, they were badly needed: ~~~

~~~ Tracey Tully, et al., of the New York Times: “Meals had been erratic at the privately run facility that last month began holding migrants facing deportation. Some detainees were sleeping on floors. And the water available from faucets was sometimes scalding or foul tasting. Several dozen men in Unit 5, on an upper floor of the jailhouse known as Delaney Hall, had grown frustrated. And after returning Thursday afternoon from a first-floor cafeteria, where they said they had been given slices of bread in place of a meal, they began covering security cameras and smashing at walls and windows. Two security guards stationed in the unit retreated.... By the time the disruption was over, four men had escaped.... The men who escaped had punched a hole through an exterior wall of the jail that [Sen. Andy] Kim [D-N.J.] described as crude — 'essentially just drywall with some mesh inside.'”

Here's a NYT front-page analysis that concludes Trump is a buffoon, a remarkably incompetent negotiator who grossly overestimates his own prowess. There's not much sugar-coating here, and the reporters replace both-siderism with a note that Obama got it done (before Trump foolishly blew t up). ~~~

~~~ Michael Crowley & Edward Wong of the New York Times: “... as a candidate for president in 2024, [Donald Trump] cast himself as a man of peace. His toughness and the 'respect' he enjoys from foreign leaders, he insisted, would enable him to settle conflicts almost with a snap of his fingers. 'My proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier,' Mr. Trump said in his January inaugural address. The war in Ukraine could be ended in as little as 24 hours, he said. He would knock heads to reach an agreement between Israel and Hamas to stop the fighting in Gaza. And he said he would strike a nuclear deal with Iran.... A day after Israel began a massive attack on Iran, however, Mr. Trump’s peace projects are in tatters.... The results undermine Mr. Trump’s argument that he can solve intractable problems with common sense and hard-nosed savvy while ignoring protocol, shunning experts and dispatching inexperienced envoys.... Mr. Trump also appears to be susceptible to conflating flattery and sweet talk from other leaders with a willingness to compromise their interests.... Mr. Trump seems to lack patience with the hard work required to get to real diplomatic outcomes.” ~~~

~~~ Max Boot of the Washington Post: “The president is no warmonger, but his clumsy attempts at making peace keep coming up empty.... In the international arena, [Donald Trump] clearly wants peace. He just doesn’t know how to achieve it. Trump came to office promising to end the Ukraine-Russia war in a day. It has been 144 days since his inauguration, and the prospect of peace appears as remote as ever. Indeed, Russia is mounting a new ground offensive and staging its biggest air attacks on Ukrainian cities. Trump has also gotten tired of Israel’s endless war in Gaza and told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wrap it up. The Trump administration did help to broker a six-week ceasefire, but after it ended on March 18, the war resumed, as brutal as ever. And then, for the past two months, Trump has been trying to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran while pressuring Israel not to launch a military strike. Yet that is just what Netanyahu has done, sending some 200 Israeli aircraft to attack targets across Iran. On Friday, Iran retaliated by launching drones and ballistic missiles against Israel.... Trump’s disastrous decision to exit the accord in 2018, even though the Iranians were abiding by it, lit the long fuse that resulted in the latest war between Iran and Israel. It is a conflict that Israel is likely to win, but the fact that the shooting has started is a sign of how ineffectual Trump’s diplomacy has been.” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Here's yet another example of Trump's unwarranted self-regard and gross incompetence re: international relations. ~~~

~~~ Surprise, Surprise! Minho Kim & Chris Cameron of the New York Times: “The Farsi language news broadcast for Voice of America was abruptly reactivated on Friday, calling back dozens of workers for the news network who had been put on paid leave as hostilities between Israel and Iran intensified, two staff members at the Farsi news service said. Voice of America, a federally funded news network that reports the news in dozens of foreign languages, had previously included a news service in Farsi, also known as Persian, the language most commonly spoken in Iran. Workers for the Farsi news service were among the vast majority of staff at Voice of America who were placed on paid administrative leave after ... [Donald] Trump signed an executive order gutting the news agency in March.... “After months off the air, we’ve already lost a lot of audience and credibility,” Patsy Widakuswara, a former Voice of America White House bureau chief who was placed on leave and is leading a lawsuit against  [Kari] Lake and the U.S. Agency for Global Media, said in a statement.  'They should bring us all back so we can respond to breaking news in all parts of the world.'... [Ms.] Lake ... did not respond to a request for comment.” MB: No, I suppose she was otherwise occupied trying to scrub the egg off her face. Politico's report is here.

Adam Taylor of the Washington Post: “A federal judge in California has halted a State Department plan to lay off almost 2,000 employees, marking a setback to Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s push to rapidly downsize the agency. Speaking in court Friday, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco said an earlier ruling that prohibited federal agencies from laying off people also applied to the State Department’s downsizing efforts.... In response, Alex Resar, a Justice Department lawyer, said that the government would halt plans to send out layoff notices Saturday, according to an account from Reuters. A Justice Department spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and attempts to reach Resar were unsuccessful. The judge’s intervention provides a reprieve, if only temporarily, for U.S.-based employees of the State Department expected to be targeted by the plan to cut positions in what the department’s leadership says is a bid to streamline the agency to focus on 'core U.S. foreign policy objectives.'”

Zach Montague of the New York Times: “A federal judge sided with a coalition of states on Friday that had sued to stop stringent new voting ID requirements that ... [Donald] Trump laid out in an executive order in March. The ruling went further than a previous court decision to block most of the key aspects of Mr. Trump’s efforts to overhaul election law by executive order. In addition to indefinitely blocking provisions that would allow the federal government to require proof of citizenship for new voters, the judge’s ruling on Friday blocks a directive for Attorney General Pam Bondi to take action against states that continue counting ballots beyond Election Day. In her opinion, Judge Denise J. Casper of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts wrote that the states were likely to succeed in showing that the order exceeded President Trump's authority and risked disenfranchising some of the electorate. The ruling blocked the order from taking effect until the resolution of the case. 'The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections,' Judge Casper, an Obama appointee, wrote.” The AP's report is here. (Also linked yesterday.) 

Chris Cameron of the New York Times: “A federal judge in Maryland reversed ... [Donald] Trump’s firings of the three Democratic members of the five-member Consumer Product Safety Commission, which monitors the safety of products like toys, cribs and electronics. In the ruling, Judge Matthew J. Maddox of the Federal District Court in Maryland said that the law only allowed Mr. Trump to fire the officials for 'neglect of duty or malfeasance,' while Mr. Trump had purported to fire them without cause. 'Plaintiffs have performed ably in their roles,' Judge Maddox wrote, 'and have never been accused of neglect of duty or malfeasance in office by either President Trump or President Biden.'” The opinion linked in the story is provided by the courts and is not firewalled.

Robin Pogrebin & Graham Bowley of the New York Times: Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery whom ... [Donald] Trump announced he was firing last month, is stepping down, explaining in a statement on Friday that she thought her decision was in the best interests of the institution. This week the Smithsonian Institution, which oversees the museum and has long operated as independent of the executive branch, reiterated that it retains the legal authority over personnel including Ms. Sajet, whom the president had criticized as partisan. The White House had created a list of grievances that it suggested made Ms. Sajet an inappropriate choice to lead a national museum, including public comments about racial and gender inequality in America.” MB: I'm sorry she gave up. IMO, it's worth a lot of heartache to face off a tyrant. (Also linked yesterday.) 

Rob Wile, et al., of NBC News: "... Donald Trump continues to enjoy income streams from scores of luxury properties and business ventures, many of which are worth tens of millions of dollars, according to a financial disclosure form filed late Friday. Released by the Office of Government Ethics, Trump’s 2025 financial disclosure spans 234 pages in all, including 145 pages of stock and bond investments, and is dated Friday with Trump’s signature. One of the largest sources of income on the form is the $57,355,532 he received from his ownership stake in World Liberty Financial, the cryptocurrency platform launched last year. The form shows that World Liberty’s sales of digital tokens have been highly lucrative for Trump and his family." Read on. A New York Times story is here.

Christina Jewett & Sheryl Stolberg of the New York Times: “Three of the new advisers appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to guide the government on immunization policy took part in lawsuits casting doubt on the safety or efficacy of vaccines, public records show. In dismissing all 17 members of an influential Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory panel on Monday, Mr. Kennedy cited what he said was a history of conflicts of interest that he claimed made those experts a 'rubber stamp' on approving vaccines. But adding members who assisted in legal cases that were either against vaccine makers or that suggested widespread vaccine-caused harm raises questions about a different form of potential bias.” ~~~

~~~ Lena Sun of the Washington Post: “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. this week put to rest any doubt about his intent to use his perch as health and human services secretary to advance his long-standing anti-vaccine agenda.... Now that we know Kennedy’s ACIP picks, it doesn’t take much imagination to predict what will come next. The new members will probably cherry-pick 'research' that calls into question the safety and effectiveness of well-established vaccines and advise the CDC to stop recommending certain ones. At best, the vaccines would remain available, though at a cost, as insurers are required to fully cover only ACIP-recommended vaccines. At worst, even those who want vaccines would no longer be able to access them.”

Lisa Friedman of the New York Times: “The Interior Department plans to remove or cover up all 'inappropriate content' at national parks and sites by Sept. 17 and is asking the park visitors to report any 'negative' information about past or living Americans, according to internal documents. It’s a move that historians worry could lead to the erasure of history involving gay and transgender figures, civil rights struggles and other subjects deemed improper by the Trump administration. Staff at the National Park Service, which is part of the Interior Department, were instructed to post QR codes and signs at all 433 national parks, monuments and historic sites by Friday asking visitors to flag anything they think should be changed.... Leaders at the park service would then review concerns about anything that  'inappropriately disparages Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times),' according to slides presented this week at a meeting with park superintendents.”

Marie: Here's a story that may give us a clue as to why Trump/Musk were so eager to fire NOAA employees. I thought it was just because they don't give a damn about people who may depend on tornado warnings or hurricane & other advisories. That's almost certainly true, but maybe decimating NOAA is yet another way of trying to hide the effects of climate change: ~~~

~~~ Ian Livingston of the Washington Post: “Temperatures are forecast to soar into the mid-80s in central Alaska ... this weekend and perhaps into next week. The National Weather Service has issued a heat advisory for Sunday afternoon in an area that includes Fairbanks.... Alaska is prone to some of the most significant warming on Earth from human-caused climate change.... Warming in Alaska is two to three times the average of the rest of the globe.”

Mark Berman of the Washington Post: “Seven partners at the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher are leaving that business after it reached an agreement with the Trump administration and moving to Cooley, which successfully challenged the president’s actions in court.... The moves, which were announced Friday by Cooley, add to an ongoing exodus from law firms that struck deals with ... Donald Trump’s administration to avoid potentially punishing sanctions.”

~~~~~~~~~~

Israel/Iran. New York Times liveblog: “Israel and Iran exchanged deadly attacks for the second straight day on Saturday, and neither showed any sign of heeding international pleas for an immediate de-escalation of hostilities. Israel is targeting Iranian nuclear and military assets. Iran, in turn, has launched barrages of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel. The sweeping attacks by Israel, which began early Friday, have killed more than 70 people in Iran, including four top security chiefs, and damaged the country’s main nuclear site at Natanz. Iran retaliated by launching scores of missiles at Israel. At least three people have been killed and dozens wounded in these attacks. It is the most intense fighting in decades between the two heavily armed countries, and has stirred anxiety over the prospect of an increasingly deadly conflict that could draw in the United States and other major powers.” ~~~

     ~~~ The AP says it has "the latest" here.

Friday
Jun132025

The Conversation -- June 13, 2025

Nicholas Slayton of Task & Purpose: "U.S. Marines temporarily detained a civilian in Los Angeles Friday afternoon, the first known case of the military doing so since it deployed to Los Angeles County. The incident was first reported by Reuters, who identified the detained man as U.S. Army veteran Marcos Leao. A spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command confirmed that an individual was detained, but turned over to law enforcement officials after approximately 10 minutes. He was transferred to the custody of officers from the Department of Homeland Security before being released. Per Reuters, Leao was on his way to the nearby Veterans Affairs campus when he crossed yellow tape at the Wilshire federal building, which Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment took over guarding this afternoon. Marines quickly detained him and restrained him using zip ties." 

Laura Romero & Katherine Faulders of ABC News: "Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty Friday to human smuggling charges, and the judge in case said she would wait to issue a decision on whether he should be released from custody pending trial. One week after he was brought back to the Unites States from detention in El Salvador, Abrego Garcia entered his not guilty plea at his arraignment in Tennessee, where federal prosecutors have charged him with transporting undocumented migrants within the U.S. in what they say was a conspiracy involving the domestic transport of thousands of noncitizens from Mexico and Central America, including some children, in exchange for thousands of dollars. Following his plea, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes heard arguments over whether he should continue to be detained, after which she said she would likely issue a written order in the near future -- 'soon rather than later,' she said."

Madeline Sherratt of the Independent: “A Florida sheriff issued a stark message to protesters planning to demonstrate this weekend against increasing ICE arrests nationwide. Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey warned in a press conference Thursday..., 'If you throw a brick, a firebomb, or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will be notifying your family where to collect your remains, because we will kill you, graveyard dead. We’re not going to play.'...” MB: Obviously I don't think a person should throw a brick that damages property. But would I kill him for doing so? Absolutely not. And neither would a responsible law enforcement officer. 

What privacy advocates warned could happen has happened: ~~~

⭐~~~ Kimberly Kindy & Amanda Seitz of the AP: “... Donald Trump’s administration this week provided deportation officials with personal data -- including the immigration status -- on millions of Medicaid enrollees, a move that could make it easier to locate people as part of his sweeping immigration crackdown. An internal memo and emails obtained by The Associated Press show that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully sought to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. Nevertheless, two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered the dataset handed over to the Department of Homeland Security, the emails show. Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the directive. Besides helping authorities locate migrants, experts said, the government could also use the information to scuttle the hopes of migrants seeking green cards, permanent residency or citizenship if they had ever obtained Medicaid benefits funded by the federal government.”

The dataset includes the information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C., all of which allow non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars. CMS transferred the information just as the Trump administration was ramping up its enforcement efforts in Southern California.

Jonah Bromwich of the New York Times: “The Trump administration, blocked by a judge from detaining Mahmoud Khalil on one set of legal grounds, has officially shifted to another as it fights to hold him in federal custody. Justice Department lawyers told the judge, Michael E. Farbiarz, on Friday, that Mr. Khalil was being held on allegations that had been added to his case more than a week after his arrest in March. Judge Farbiarz has already suggested the allegations do not wholly explain his continued detention.... Justice Department lawyers wrote in a court filing submitted Friday afternoon that Mr. Khalil [now] was being held on the [later-added] allegations ... that he had failed to disclose his membership in certain organizations when he applied for legal residency in March 2024. Scott Schuchart, a former senior homeland security official, said the government’s shifting rationale in Mr. Khalil’s case was typical of the administration’s broader approach to immigration cases. 'I find it outrageous just with regard to the disrespect with which they’ve treated the court and the entire process throughout this case,' he said, adding, 'It shows nothing but contempt for the rule of law.'”

Zach Montague of the New York Times: “A federal judge sided with a coalition of states on Friday that had sued to stop stringent new voting ID requirements that President Trump laid out in an executive order in March. The ruling went further than a previous court decision to block most of the key aspects of Mr. Trump’s efforts to overhaul election law by executive order. In addition to indefinitely blocking provisions that would allow the federal government to require proof of citizenship for new voters, the judge’s ruling on Friday blocks a directive for Attorney General Pam Bondi to take action against states that continue counting ballots beyond Election Day. In her opinion, Judge Denise J. Casper of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts wrote that the states were likely to succeed in showing that the order exceeded President Trump's authority and risked disenfranchising some of the electorate. The ruling blocked the order from taking effect until the resolution of the case. 'The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections,' Judge Casper, an Obama appointee, wrote.” The AP's report is here.

Robin Pogrebin & Graham Bowley of the New York Times: Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery whom ... [Donald] Trump announced he was firing last month, is stepping down, explaining in a statement on Friday that she thought her decision was in the best interests of the institution. This week the Smithsonian Institution, which oversees the museum and has long operated as independent of the executive branch, reiterated that it retains the legal authority over personnel including Ms. Sajet, whom the president had criticized as partisan. The White House had created a list of grievances that it suggested made Ms. Sajet an inappropriate choice to lead a national museum, including public comments about racial and gender inequality in America.” MB: I'm sorry she gave up. IMO, it's worth a lot of heartache to face off a tyrant.

Max Boot of the Washington Post: “The president is no warmonger, but his clumsy attempts at making peace keep coming up empty.... In the international arena, [Donald Trump] clearly wants peace. He just doesn’t know how to achieve it. Trump came to office promising to end the Ukraine-Russia war in a day. It has been 144 days since his inauguration, and the prospect of peace appears as remote as ever. Indeed, Russia is mounting a new ground offensive and staging its biggest air attacks on Ukrainian cities. Trump has also gotten tired of Israel’s endless war in Gaza and told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wrap it up. The Trump administration did help to broker a six-week ceasefire, but after it ended on March 18, the war resumed, as brutal as ever. And then, for the past two months, Trump has been trying to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran while pressuring Israel not to launch a military strike. Yet that is just what Netanyahu has done, sending some 200 Israeli aircraft to attack targets across Iran. On Friday, Iran retaliated by launching drones and ballistic missiles against Israel.... Trump’s disastrous decision to exit the accord in 2018, even though the Iranians were abiding by it, lit the long fuse that resulted in the latest war between Iran and Israel. It is a conflict that Israel is likely to win, but the fact that the shooting has started is a sign of how ineffectual Trump’s diplomacy has been.”

~~~~~~~~~~

Marie: Oh, it's Friday the 13th. I'm not superstitious, but I can still hope the Fates do not smile on Donald Trump today. 

Here's Tom Sullivan's list of resources for tomorrow's "No Kings Day" protests around the country:

No Kings Day, June 14th (this Saturday)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Maegan Vazquez, et al., of the Washington Post: “Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) was forcibly removed Thursday from a news conference held in Los Angeles by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem focused on recent protests in the area against immigration enforcement efforts. Padilla appeared to disrupt* the news conference, which took place at the Los Angeles FBI headquarters. 'I have questions for the secretary,' he said as he was pushed out of the room.  Speaking to reporters after the incident, Padilla said he was waiting for a scheduled briefing from federal officials when he learned about Noem’s news conference. He said he then went to the news conference to 'hear if I could learn any new, additional information' about the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement actions. 'I was there peacefully. At one point, I had a question and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately, forcefully removed from the room. I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed. I was not arrested. I was not detained,' Padilla said. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said Padilla was not compliant with officers’ commands and that the U.S. Secret Service 'thought he was an attacker.... Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem.... Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers’ repeated commands.'” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Here's video. Sen. Padilla clearly says, "I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the Secretary." ~~~

     ~~~ Rebecca Shabad & Jacob Soboroff of NBC News: "'I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla said to Noem, which prompted several men dressed in plain clothes to physically push him out of the room. A top FBI official later said bureau personnel and Secret Service agents were involved in the senator's removal.... Video shows Padilla being taken into a hallway outside and pushed face forward onto the ground as officers with FBI-identifying vests told the senator to put his hands behind his back. The officers then handcuffed him.... During an interview on Fox News, [Noem] falsely said Padilla did not identify himself before being forced out. 'We were conducting a press conference to update everyone on the enforcement actions that are ongoing to bring people bring peace to the city of Los Angeles, and this man burst into the room, started lunging towards the podium, interrupting me and elevating his voice, and was stopped, did not identify himself, and was removed from the room,' she said." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Lewandowski to the Rescue! Shawn Hubleret al., of the New York Times: “Senator Alex Padilla, Democrat of California, was forcibly removed on Thursday from a news conference being held by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, and handcuffed after he interrupted Ms. Noem at a federal building in West Los Angeles.... On the videos [taken by a Padilla staffer and a Fox News reporter], Mr. Padilla appeared stunned but repeatedly said he was a U.S. senator. In an interview hours later, Mr. Padilla said that he had demanded to know why he had been detained and where he was being escorted 'when of all people, Corey Lewandowski' — a combative former Trump campaign aide and adviser to Ms. Noem — 'comes running down the hall and he starts yelling,  “Let him go! Let him go!”’”

     ~~~ Marie: If Trump "law enforcement" officers decide you're not a White person, they will manhandle you. It doesn't matter if you're a member of Congress. Ask Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) about that. BTW, it isn't clear to me that Sen. Padilla tried to disrupt the press conference as the reporters allege. *Update: The WashPo has removed "appeared to disrupt" from its lede, and the phrase does not appear elsewhere in the report. In an interview with NBC reporter Jacob Soboroff, Padilla said he was escorted into the room where Noem was giving her presser by a National Guardsman and an FBI agent. They literally opened the door for him, so he obviously was not an "attacker" who "burst into the room," as Noem claimed. Moreover, Padilla was in the back of the room, behind reporters and photojournalists who showed up for Noem's dress-up party. Besides all that, the incident took place in a federal building, where everyone who wishes to enter is screened. ~~~

~~~ Sen. Alex Padilla disputed the White House’s account of the events surrounding his forcible removal from a news conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles on Thursday, pushing back against key details about what exactly preceded his handcuffing by federal law enforcement agents. Both the White House and Noem said Padilla, D-Calif., failed to identify himself to security, yelled and lunged toward Noem.... Padilla denied all of Noem's characterizations in his first interview after the incident — on MSNBC with NBC News' Jacob Soboroff. 'That's ridiculous. It's a lie but par for the course for this administration,' Padilla began. 'They said I wasn’t wearing my pin. My polo says "United States Senate,"' Padilla said. 'There was no threat. There was no lunging. I raised my voice to ask a question, and it took what, maybe, half a second before multiple agents were on me.'" ~~~

~~~ Marie: Chris Hayes of MSNBC made an important point last night that may get lost in the story of the jackbooted thuggery going on there. Here's what Noem said just that seems to have prompted Padilla to speak up: "We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into this city." Although prior to that Noem did talk about how the administration and cooperating law enforcement personnel were ridding the area of "dangerous criminals," her promise to "liberate" the city from his elected leaders appears to be the ultimate goal. That is, the plan is to depose the democratically-elected governor of California and mayor of Los Angeles and replace them with Trump-approved puppets. Kristi is not too bright, so she probably did not realize she was giving away the plot, but that's it. Trump and others have said that what they're doing in California they will do all over the country. So there ya go. Democracy -- the will of the people -- is so over, at least in jurisdictions that tend to favor Democrats. ~~~

     ~~~ Update. Nicole Lafond of TPM does catch Noem's statement, but Lafond doesn't take the implication as far as I think it goes. Her colleague at TPM, Josh Kovensky, whom Lafond cites, does latch onto an implication of the attack on Sen. Padilla: “Just as the White House order authorizing the military deployment to LA declares that 'protests' which 'inhibit' law enforcement 'constitute a form of rebellion' against the U.S. government, so does a U.S. Senator asking a question at an open presser make him a threat.” ~~~

     ~~~ Update 2. Michael Luciano of Mediaite also highlights Noem's "liberate" remark. He leaves it to the reader to figure out the implications (which is fine). ~~~

     ~~~ Update 3. AND Finally Heather Cox Richardson absolutely gets it: "In other words, the Trump administration is vowing to get rid of the democratically elected government of California by using military force. That threat is the definition of a coup. It suggests MAGA considers any political victory but their own to be illegitimate and considers themselves justified in removing those governmental officials with violence: a continuation of the attempt of January 6, 2021, to overturn the results of a presidential election." Further down in her column, she notes that even Trump acknowledges that his raids are no longer about deportation. "So if it is no longer administration policy to engage in the sweeps that are causing such chaos and sparking protests, why are Republican authorities mobilizing troops?"

~~~ Inae Oh of Mother Jones: “The unbridled willingness to punish elected officials, through forceful removal and criminal apprehension, marks a key escalation point in the Trump administration’s embrace of blatantly authoritarian tendencies, as they seek to crush dissent, peaceful or not. And it carries the tacit approval of the president. 'If there’s any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump said this week in advance of his military-birthday parade in DC this weekend.” ~~~

~~~ After acknowledging it was not his place to say, Speaker Mike Johnson said he endorsed censuring Sen. Padilla for "fighting physically and ... charging Cabinet secretaries." Bible Mike apparently believes in the word of Saint Kristi of Noem as she spake on Fox "News." (Link is to a Hill report.) ~~~

~~~ Caitlin Yilek & Kaia Hubbard of CBS News: "Lawmakers are calling for answers after Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla was forcibly removed from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's news conference in Los Angeles on Thursday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, expressed shock over 'the manhandling of a United States senator,' adding that he wants answers 'to what the hell went on.'... Sen. Adam Schiff, Padilla's fellow California senator, called on Noem to resign and said there should be an investigation into law enforcement's conduct.... Schiff was one of a slew of Senate Democrats who took to the Senate floor following the incident. Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon reiterated Schumer's call for an investigation, saying he was 'extremely outraged.'  Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey said 'this to me is such an abuse of authority' and 'there can be no justification.' Sen. Patty Murray of Washington said..., 'I have been here for more than 32 years.... I have never come this close to having tears in my eyes as I speak to both sides of this aisle about this horrendous incident that occurred.'" And so forth. Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is still "trying to get all the facts." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Hilariously, Thune seems to think he can't "get all the facts" till he talks to Kristi Noem. That would be the same Kristi Noem who lied multiple times on Fox "News" about Padilla's actions. ~~~

~~~ Andrew Solender of Axios: "Rep. John Mannion (D-N.Y.) shocked colleagues in both parties Thursday by tearing into Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) in what sources described as a tense and profane confrontation over the forcible removal of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.).... Lawmakers and aides who witnessed the Mannion-Lawler incident described it to Axios as the product of rising partisan tensions over the Trump administration's use of legal and physical force against Democrats.... 'Mannion stands up and just starts yelling at him for absolutely no reason but emotion about the atmosphere that we're in right now,' said one House Democrat.... The lawmaker said Mannion told Lawler  'something to the effect of, "You've got to do something. Stand up. Grow a pair of balls."' Lawler's response, they said: 'F*** you ... I have no idea what you're talking about.'... Just before the vote, Mannion had a similar outburst during a press conference on the House steps regarding the Padilla incident. 'We need you,' he shouted at the press. 'We need you to hold them accountable. Media, it's your country too.... Don't cover the distractions. Cover the actions that lead us towards authoritarianism, please.'" ~~~

Jennifer Bendery of the Huffington Post: A House committee hearing devolved into chaos on Thursday as Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) pressed lawmakers to subpoena Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem after her security team assaulted Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.).... The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing was underway when the shocking news broke of Padilla being forcibly removed from Noem’s press event and dragged to the ground. Frost repeatedly ... asked that the committee subpoena Noem over the scuffle, which led to sniping from Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) and other Republicans. 'Reclaiming my time!' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said repeatedly.... Nevertheless, Frost persisted, bringing up details about the California senator being handcuffed and thrown to the ground, and asking for a subpoena — until Comer snapped. 'Shut up!' he shouted at Frost. 'Just shut up!'... 'He’s a former Antifa member!' Greene ... [said of] Frost. When Frost asked that Comer strike her inaccurate comments from the hearing record, he declined. Greene later said she would revise her remarks for the record, to note Frost was once arrested in 2021 at a voter’s rights march. Frost said at the time it was an act of nonviolent resistance.” Includes video, which was kinda fun to watch.

Rebecca Schoenkopf of Wonkette has a morning roundup of news that includes a number of stories re: The Padilla Matter. With appropriately snide asides. Also, Schoenkopf includes a transcript of L.A. Mayor Karen Bass's remarks at a press conference yesterday (??), which as Schoenkopf says, are worth reading in full. Marie: Also, her post makes me wonder why it was necessary to wrestle Sen. Padilla to the floor. There were four officers manhandling him, and he sure didn't seem to be set on running away. So why not just cuff him if restraining him was the objective? The whole thing seems performative to me; that they knew who he was and that their real objective was to humiliate him.  

Paul KrugmanThe militarized response to the LA demonstrations and Trump’s warning that anyone protesting his military birthday parade (which millions probably will) will be 'met with heavy force' aren’t about moving the poll numbers. They’re all about rejecting the idea that Americans have a right to oppose Trump policies.... This is the moment. Everything is on the line, right now.” (Also linked yesterday.) MB Note: Krugman wrote this before Kristi Noem promised to "liberate" Angelinos from their "burdensome, socialist" elected officials.

Charlie Savage, et al., of the New York Times: “A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked the federal government’s mobilization of the California National Guard to protect immigration agents from protesters in Los Angeles. He ruled that the Trump administration had illegally taken control of the state’s troops and ordered them to return to taking orders from Gov. Gavin Newsom. In an extraordinary 36-page ruling, Judge Charles Breyer of the Federal District Court in San Francisco severed Mr. Trump’s control of up to 4,000 National Guard troops, hundreds of whom are already deployed in the streets of Los Angeles on his orders. The judge said the administration’s seizure of them violated required procedures in a federal statute.... Donald Trump’s 'actions were illegal — both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,' Judge Breyer wrote. 'He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the governor of the state of California forthwith.' The directive would have taken effect at noon Pacific time on Friday. But the Trump administration immediately filed a notice that it was appealing Judge Breyer’s decision. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed to stay the ruling while it reviews the case, temporarily blocking it from taking effect.

“The ruling, which accused Mr. Trump of setting a “dangerous precedent for future domestic military activity,” was the latest in a series of judicial rebukes to Mr. Trump’s expansive claims of wartime or emergency powers over matters ranging from deporting people without due process to unilaterally imposing widespread tariffs.... Judge Breyer’s ruling on the National Guard went beyond what California had asked for ... [which] was for a temporary restraining order limiting military forces under federal control to guarding federal buildings.... Judge Breyer blocked Mr. Trump from using California’s National Guard at all. But he also rejected a request by the state and Governor Newsom to restrain a separate group of active-duty Marines, which the administration has also mobilized to counter the protesters.... Judge Breyer said it would be inappropriate to issue any order restricting the Marines’ actions when they have not done anything that would violate the Posse Comitatus Act....” The order linked in the story is via the court, so not firewalled. ~~~

     ~~~ Politico's report, by Kyle Cheney & Josh Gerstein, is here

Marianne LeVine, et al., of the Washington Post: “The Trump administration wants to use the National Guard more broadly to enact the president’s immigration agenda, according to border czar Tom Homan, documents and people familiar with plans. 'They can’t make immigration arrests, but they can certainly augment for security, transportation, infrastructure, intelligence,' Homan said in an interview with The Washington Post.... The National Guard would be tasked with helping ICE catch fugitives as well as guard detention centers, process and transport migrants and other tasks, according to a memo obtained by The Washington Post. Pentagon officials say they are looking into the request but have not yet decided on the number of troops it will send.... The administration has been considering the use of the National Guard  'for months' in immigration enforcement in the interior of the United States, Homan said, but he declined to specify who was responsible for the idea. Trump and his key adviser, Stephen Miller, have long said they hope to use the military to realize a mass deportation program.”

He's Not All There.” Ben Johansen of PoliticoGov. Gavin Newsom & Donald Trumphad a Saturday morning discussion, the two men say, in which Trump purports to have brought up the National Guard. But Newsom decried that account as false. 'He lied...,' Newsom said on The New York Times podcast. '... He lied. Stone cold liar.' Once Trump began fabricating parts of their conversation later that day, Newsom alleged, it started 'to disturb me on a different level that maybe he actually believed he said those things,' he said. 'He’s not all there,' the governor added.” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Ja'han Jones of MSNBC: “The Trump administration has tried to portray the Los Angeles demonstrations against its ICE enforcement raids as chaos at a scale worthy of military intervention. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Police Department has repeatedly disputed that claim.... 'The possible arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles absent clear coordination presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city,” Chief Jim McDonnell said, adding, “The Los Angeles Police Department, alongside our mutual aid partners, have decades of experience managing large-scale public demonstrations, and we remain confident in our ability to do so professionally and effectively.' On Wednesday, Trump ... [said,] 'If we weren’t there, if we didn’t bring in the National Guard and the Marines, you would probably have a city that was burning to the ground.'... (In reality, the largely peaceful protests have been confined to just a few blocks in the city.) Trump continued, 'In fact, the chief of police said so much, if you look at what his statements were. He said, “We’re very lucky to have had them.’” But McDonnell rejected that claim. Asked by CNN host Kaitlin Collins if Trump’s characterization of his statement was accurate, McDonnell said, 'No....'” (Also linked yesterday.) 

Ellen Barry & Maya Shwayder of the New York Times: Kseniia Petrova, the Russian scientist who spent four months in detention after failing to declare scientific samples she was carrying into the country, was freed on bail from federal custody on Thursday by a magistrate judge in Boston. Since her detention at Boston’s Logan Airport in February, Ms. Petrova has been transferred to detention centers in Vermont, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and, briefly, Rhode Island, before returning to Boston early Thursday. 'Welcome to Massachusetts,' said the judge, Judith G. Dein.... Ms. Petrova’s release is a victory, but a temporary one. She is still facing a two-pronged prosecution: The Trump administration began deportation proceedings against her in February, and around three months later, after she challenged the move in court, filed criminal smuggling charges against her. Lawyers for the government have said they intend to deport Ms. Petrova to Russia, a country she fled for political reasons in 2022. She has said that if she returns, she fears arrest or even death because of her activism.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: My thanks to the Trump administration for making me realize what a remarkably brave person I am: Petrova is yet another of those dangerous immigrant desperados of whom I am not afraid. 

digby: Trump can't figure out why Russia is our enemy and Germany & Japan are our allies when during WWII, Russia was our ally and Germany and Japan were our enemies. "I think he sincerely believes this because he literally knows nothing about American history and seems to be very impressed with something he heard or watched recently that’s given him some very warped ideas about World War II.... This is what happens when a narcissistic megalomaniac realizes that nothing and no one can ever hold him accountable for anything. He’s creating the world anew." BTW, the Bulwark citation embedded in digby's post does give the sense of what Trump said, but you might want to listen to the clip to hear what he actually said.

Mark Berman & Maria Sacchetti, et al., of the Washington Post: “A federal judge in Colorado on Thursday said in a ruling that the Trump administration cannot rapidly deport the family of an Egyptian man charged with attacking a gathering in Boulder held in support of the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza. U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher had previously blocked federal officials from removing Hayam El Gamal, the suspected attacker’s wife, and the couple’s five children from the country. He had also barred officials from taking the family out of the judicial district, but by then officers had sent El Gamal and the children to a family detention facility in Texas. In a 15-page decision, Gallagher said he would transfer the case, with his orders temporarily barring deportation in place, to federal court in Texas for a decision about whether the family should be released from detention.”

Ana Swanson & Alan Rappeport of the New York Times: “Washing machines, refrigerators and other common household appliances made with steel parts will soon be subject to expanded tariffs, the Commerce Department said Thursday. The department said in a notice that levies would take effect on so-called steel derivative products on June 23 and will be set at 50 percent, the current level for all other steel and aluminum imports. The new tariffs will apply to the value of steel content in each import, the notice said. While many products have become subject to higher import taxes since Mr. Trump began implementing his aggressive trade policy, Thursday’s announcement marked one of the first times this year that everyday consumer goods were specifically targeted. The result will also apply to imported dishwashers, dryers, stoves and food waste disposals, and could translate into higher costs for American households.” MB: I sure am glad I bought a houseful of appliances in February. I knew I wouldn't be using them right away but I saw the Trump mischief coming. 

Chris Cameron of the New York Times: Donald “Trump moved on Thursday to withdraw from a Biden administration agreement that had brokered a truce in a decades-long legal battle with tribes in the Pacific Northwest. The federal government has been mired in legal battles for decades over the depletion of fish populations in the Columbia River Basin, caused by four hydroelectric dams in the lower Snake River. Native American tribes have argued in court that the federal government has violated longstanding treaties by failing to protect the salmon and other fish that have been prevented by the dams from spawning upstream of the river. That legal fight is now expected to resume, with no brokered agreement in place. In its statement announcing the withdrawal, the White House made no mention of the affected tribes and portrayed the issue falsely as revolving around 'speculative climate change concerns.'” MB: Happy to see the NYT is once again directly pointing out a Trumpy lie.

Chris Cameron & Peter Baker of the New York Times: “Christopher Landau, the deputy secretary of state, posted and then quickly deleted a statement on Wednesday evening attacking another high-level U.S. diplomat and criticizing the NATO military alliance.... Matt Whitaker, whom ... [Donald] Trump appointed as his ambassador to NATO..., briefly found himself a public target of another Trump administration official’s ire after publishing a routine social media post highlighting his meetings with ambassadors from Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. 'What happens in the Indo-Pacific matters for transatlantic security,' Mr. Whitaker wrote on Tuesday morning on his official X account. 'That’s why NATO works with partners globally.'... 'He obviously didn’t get the memo,' Mr. Landau said of Mr. Whitaker, 'of our Deputies Committee meeting on this very issue. NATO is still a solution in search of a problem.' It is unclear if Mr. Landau had unintentionally made the comment publicly, or if he had meant to insult a fellow diplomat in the internet’s public square before quickly regretting it.”

Andrew Egger of the Bulwark has a bit more on the Quackpots RFKJ has put on the CDC's Immunization Advisory Committee after firing all the members of the committee of actual immunization experts. "It turns out, when you automatically exclude researchers whose work has shown vaccines to be safe and effective, the pool of vaccine experts from which to draw to staff your vaccine-policy commission gets very shallow very fast." Via Rebecca Schoenkopf of Wonkette.

     Image via Krugman, linked below. ~~~

~~~ CBO: The Rich Get Richer & the Poor Get Poorer. Andrew Duehren of the New York Times: “The far-reaching domestic policy bill that Republicans recently pushed through the House would provide rich Americans with a financial lift while taking away government benefits from the poor, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said on Thursday. The analysis is the first from the budget office that lays out how Americans at different income levels would be affected by the Republican legislation, which slashes taxes and cuts spending on safety-net programs like Medicaid and food stamps.... The bottom 10 percent, for example, would overall lose government benefits worth an average of $1,559, or 3.9 percent of their current income, each year over the next decade, according to the budget office. The bottom 30 percent of Americans would all, on average, lose more benefits than they would receive from the bill. In contrast, the top 10 percent would gain an average of $12,044, a 2.3 percent annual increase to their current income. Middle-class Americans would see smaller gains. The middle 10 percent of Americans would on average net $514 per year if the measure were enacted, an annual increase of 0.5 percent in their current income. Overall, the richer Americans are, the larger the benefit they would receive from the legislation.” ~~~

     ~~~ Most Regressive Bill in Decades. Emily Badgeret al., of the New York Times: “The Republican megabill now before the Senate cuts taxes for high earners and reduces benefits for the poor. If it’s enacted, that combination would make it more regressive than any major tax or entitlement law in decades.... Tax cut packages have seldom left the poor significantly worse off. And bills that cut the safety net usually haven’t also included benefits for the rich. By inverting those precedents, congressional Republicans have created a bill unlike anything Washington has produced since deficit fears began to loom large in the 1990s.” ~~~

     ~~~ Paul Krugman: "... this bill is so cruelly regressive that it shocked even me. This bill is truly unprecedented in the extent to which it takes away from the have-nots and gives to the ultra-haves. It slashes Medicaid, taking health care away from millions. It slashes food stamps, ensuring that many will go hungry. At the same time it gives huge tax cuts to the wealthy.... Wait, it gets worse. The CBO’s analysis doesn’t consider the effect of the Trump tariffs on household incomes. This is important because tariffs are taxes — regressive taxes, that fall more heavily on lower-income than higher-income families.... The House has just enacted legislation that is desperately unpopular and would be even less popular if the public understood it fully. Why, then, did House members vote for it? Because they fear Donald Trump more than they fear the voters or because they don’t believe we will ever have fair elections again. Or both."

Catie Edmondson of the New York Times: “The House voted on Thursday to claw back $9.4 billion that lawmakers had already approved for foreign aid and public broadcasting, as Republicans banded together to codify spending cuts put forward by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. The 214-to-212 vote came after the White House asked Congress to formally approve the rollback, which had largely been enacted by executive order and DOGE. The request was something of a pivot for ... [Donald] Trump and his top officials, who have aggressively challenged Congress’s power of the purse and made clear that they are willing to steer around the legislative branch to try to unilaterally control federal spending.... The bulk of the funds targeted — $8.3 billion — is for foreign assistance programs. The remaining $1.1 billion is for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS.... Four House Republicans joined Democrats in opposing the measure, which passed only after Speaker Mike Johnson pressed a handful of G.O.P. lawmakers who had initially voted 'no' to support it.... The proposal’s fate in the Senate is unclear.” ~~~

Scott MacFarlane of CBS News: "Two police officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack filed a federal civil lawsuit, asking a judge to order the hanging of a plaque to honor police heroes who protected the Capitol, lawmakers and staff from rioters. The lawsuit cites a 2022 law signed by President Biden that required the honorary plaque be hung by March 2023. The plaque has been completed and in storage since at least last year, but GOP House Speaker Mike Johnson has not committed to installing it at the Capitol. The dispute over the plaque has angered victims and inflamed a politically divisive issue on Capitol Hill. Republican leaders, who control the administration of the Capitol complex, have not honored requests by some officers and Democratic colleagues to hang the plaque, as required under federal law. In their lawsuit, former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges argue ... [Donald] Trump has spun conspiracy theories about Jan. 6, that have been adopted by his Republican allies in Congress." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Gosh, it's not my place to say so, but maybe the House should at least censure Bible Mike for violating the law which required him to mount the plaque honoring the policemen and women who defended the Capitol on January 6.

Abbie VanSickle of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a teenage girl with epilepsy and her parents who had sued a Minnesota school district, claiming that her school had failed to provide reasonable accommodations, which made it difficult for her to receive instruction. The case hinged on what standard of proof was required to show discrimination by public schools in education-related disability lawsuits. In a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., the court held that the student and her family needed to show only that the school system had acted with 'deliberate indifference' to her educational needs when they sued. That is the same standard that applies when people sue other institutions for discrimination based on disability.” (Also linked yesterday.) 

Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously revived a suit from a couple whose home was mistakenly raided by the F.B.I., giving them a fresh opportunity to try to persuade lower courts that they should be able to sue the federal government for the harm they suffered. The case, Martin v. United States, No. 24-362, arose from a raid very early on a fall morning in 2017, when F.B.I. agents used a battering ram to knock down the front door of the home of the couple, Hilliard Toi Cliatt and Curtrina Martin. Guns drawn, the agents set off a flash-bang grenade and charged inside. The couple barricaded themselves in a closet. The agents dragged Mr. Cliatt out at gunpoint and handcuffed him. They told Ms. Martin to keep her hands up as she pleaded to see her 7-year-old son, who had been asleep in another room. As they questioned Mr. Cliatt, he gave his address. It was different from the one the agents had a warrant to enter.” (Also linked yesterday.) 

Jurors Behaving Badly. Hurubie Meko of the New York Times: “The judge overseeing the sex-crimes trial of Harvey Weinstein on Thursday declared a mistrial on a final charge against him, after the jury foreman said he was unwilling to return to deliberations. The ruling followed a wild day in court on Wednesday, in which jurors in Manhattan convicted Mr. Weinstein of a felony sex crime but were then sent home to cool off. The jury foreman had complained to the judge that deliberations had devolved into yelling and that he felt threatened by the other jurors. On Wednesday, the panel of seven women and five men announced a partial verdict, convicting Mr. Weinstein on a single count of criminal sexual act and acquitting him of another count of the same charge. They were unable to reach a consensus on a charge of third-degree rape. On Thursday, the foreman said he was not willing to return to the jury room and continue deliberating with the 11 others.” (Also linked yesterday.)  

~~~~~~~~~~

Israel, et al. New York Times: “Israel launched a stunning series of strikes on Friday morning against Iran’s nuclear program, killing three of the nation’s security chiefs. The wide-ranging attack prompted fears that long-simmering tensions between the heavily armed rivals were spiraling into a full-blown regional war. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel described the attack as a last resort to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, which Israel views as an existential threat. In addition to Iran’s nuclear program, Israel targeted and killed top Iranian officials and nuclear scientists, as well as attacking long-range missile facilities and aerial defenses.... More than 200 Israeli fighter jets took part in the attack, which targeted over 100 sites, including a major Iranian nuclear enrichment center at Natanz. The strikes were also a major blow to Iran’s military chain of command. Mohammad Bagheri, the commander in chief of the military and the second-highest commander after the supreme leader, was killed, according to the Israeli military and Iranian media.... Israel’s surprise attack came while the United States, its main patron, was negotiating a new diplomatic pact with Iran to curb its nuclear ambitions. Washington said it was not directly involved in the strikes.” At 3:45 am ET, this is the pinned item on a liveblog. ~~~

     ~~~ Here are the AP's live updates.

Thursday
Jun122025

The Conversation -- June 12, 2025

Maegan Vazquez, et al., of the Washington Post: “Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) was forcibly removed Thursday from a news conference held in Los Angeles by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem focused on recent protests in the area against immigration enforcement efforts. Padilla appeared to disrupt the news conference, which took place at the Los Angeles FBI headquarters. 'I have questions for the secretary,' he said as he was pushed out of the room.  Speaking to reporters after the incident, Padilla said he was waiting for a scheduled briefing from federal officials when he learned about Noem’s news conference. He said he then went to the news conference to 'hear if I could learn any new, additional information' about the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement actions. 'I was there peacefully. At one point, I had a question and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately, forcefully removed from the room. I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed. I was not arrested. I was not detained,' Padilla said. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said Padilla was not compliant with officers’ commands and that the U.S. Secret Service 'thought he was an attacker.... Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem.... Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers’ repeated commands.'” ~~~

     ~~~ Here's video. Sen. Padilla clearly says, "I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the Secretary." ~~~

     ~~~ Rebecca Shabad & Jacob Soboroff of NBC News: "'I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla said to Noem, which prompted several men dressed in plain clothes to physically push him out of the room. A top FBI official later said bureau personnel and Secret Service agents were involved in the senator's removal.... Video shows Padilla being taken into a hallway outside and pushed face forward onto the ground as officers with FBI-identifying vests told the senator to put his hands behind his back. The officers then handcuffed him.... During an interview on Fox News, [Noem] falsely said Padilla did not identify himself before being forced out. 'We were conducting a press conference to update everyone on the enforcement actions that are ongoing to bring people bring peace to the city of Los Angeles, and this man burst into the room, started lunging towards the podium, interrupting me and elevating his voice, and was stopped, did not identify himself, and was removed from the room,' she said."

     ~~~ Marie: If Trump "law enforcement" officers decide you're not a White person, they will manhandle you. It doesn't matter if you're a member of Congress. Ask Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.). BTW, it isn't clear to me that Sen. Padilla tried to disrupt the press conference. Update: In an interview with NBC reporter Jacob Soboroff, Padilla said he was escorted into the room where Noem was giving her presser by two federal officers, one an FBI officer. They literally opened the door for him, so he obviously was not an "attacker." The incident took place in a federal building, where everyone who wishes to enter is screened. 

He's Not All There.” Ben Johansen of PoliticoGov. Gavin Newsom & Donald Trumphad a Saturday morning discussion, the two men say, in which Trump purports to have brought up the National Guard. But Newsom decried that account as false. 'He lied...,' Newsom said on The New York Times podcast. '... He lied. Stone cold liar.' Once Trump began fabricating parts of their conversation later that day, Newsom alleged, it started 'to disturb me on a different level that maybe he actually believed he said those things,' he said. 'He’s not all there,' the governor added.” ~~~

~~~ Ja'han Jones of MSNBC: “The Trump administration has tried to portray the Los Angeles demonstrations against its ICE enforcement raids as chaos at a scale worthy of military intervention. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Police Department has repeatedly disputed that claim.... 'The possible arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles absent clear coordination presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city,” Chief Jim McDonnell said, adding, “The Los Angeles Police Department, alongside our mutual aid partners, have decades of experience managing large-scale public demonstrations, and we remain confident in our ability to do so professionally and effectively.' On Wednesday, Trump ... [said,] 'If we weren’t there, if we didn’t bring in the National Guard and the Marines, you would probably have a city that was burning to the ground.'... (In reality, the largely peaceful protests have been confined to just a few blocks in the city.) Trump continued, 'In fact, the chief of police said so much, if you look at what his statements were. He said, “We’re very lucky to have had them.’” But McDonnell rejected that claim. Asked by CNN host Kaitlin Collins if Trump’s characterization of his statement was accurate, McDonnell said, 'No....'”

Paul KrugmanThe militarized response to the LA demonstrations and Trump’s warning that anyone protesting his military birthday parade (which millions probably will) will be 'met with heavy force' aren’t about moving the poll numbers. They’re all about rejecting the idea that Americans have a right to oppose Trump policies.... This is the moment. Everything is on the line, right now.

Abbie VanSickle of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a teenage girl with epilepsy and her parents who had sued a Minnesota school district, claiming that her school had failed to provide reasonable accommodations, which made it difficult for her to receive instruction. The case hinged on what standard of proof was required to show discrimination by public schools in education-related disability lawsuits. In a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., the court held that the student and her family needed to show only that the school system had acted with 'deliberate indifference' to her educational needs when they sued. That is the same standard that applies when people sue other institutions for discrimination based on disability.”

Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously revived a suit from a couple whose home was mistakenly raided by the F.B.I., giving them a fresh opportunity to try to persuade lower courts that they should be able to sue the federal government for the harm they suffered. The case, Martin v. United States, No. 24-362, arose from a raid very early on a fall morning in 2017, when F.B.I. agents used a battering ram to knock down the front door of the home of the couple, Hilliard Toi Cliatt and Curtrina Martin. Guns drawn, the agents set off a flash-bang grenade and charged inside. The couple barricaded themselves in a closet. The agents dragged Mr. Cliatt out at gunpoint and handcuffed him. They told Ms. Martin to keep her hands up as she pleaded to see her 7-year-old son, who had been asleep in another room. As they questioned Mr. Cliatt, he gave his address. It was different from the one the agents had a warrant to enter.”

Scott MacFarlane of CBS News: "Two police officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack filed a federal civil lawsuit, asking a judge to order the hanging of a plaque to honor police heroes who protected the Capitol, lawmakers and staff from rioters. The lawsuit cites a 2022 law signed by President Biden that required the honorary plaque be hung by March 2023. The plaque has been completed and in storage since at least last year, but GOP House Speaker Mike Johnson has not committed to installing it at the Capitol. The dispute over the plaque has angered victims and inflamed a politically divisive issue on Capitol Hill. Republican leaders, who control the administration of the Capitol complex, have not honored requests by some officers and Democratic colleagues to hang the plaque, as required under federal law. In their lawsuit, former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges argue ... [Donald] Trump has spun conspiracy theories about Jan. 6, that have been adopted by his Republican allies in Congress."

Jurors Behaving Badly. Hurubie Meko of the New York Times: “The judge overseeing the sex-crimes trial of Harvey Weinstein on Thursday declared a mistrial on a final charge against him, after the jury foreman said he was unwilling to return to deliberations. The ruling followed a wild day in court on Wednesday, in which jurors in Manhattan convicted Mr. Weinstein of a felony sex crime but were then sent home to cool off. The jury foreman had complained to the judge that deliberations had devolved into yelling and that he felt threatened by the other jurors. On Wednesday, the panel of seven women and five men announced a partial verdict, convicting Mr. Weinstein on a single count of criminal sexual act and acquitting him of another count of the same charge. They were unable to reach a consensus on a charge of third-degree rape. On Thursday, the foreman said he was not willing to return to the jury room and continue deliberating with the 11 others.” 

~~~~~~~~~~

Naftali Bendavid of the Washington Post: “In Washington, tanks will roll down the streets, planes will streak overhead and bands will pump out military tunes as soldiers parade before a president who embraces a gilded, muscular form of patriotism — and whose birthday it is. Across the country, demonstrators will flood hundreds of cities and towns, making speeches and holding 'No Kings' signs to denounce what they see as ... Donald Trump’s authoritarian tactics and disregard for the Constitution. This Saturday will see one of the starkest displays of America’s divisions since Trump took office, as contrasting visions of America unfold in vivid colors on the country’s streets. Trump’s critics are especially inflamed by the notion that the president would host a military parade on his birthday, which they say carries an unmistakable whiff of authoritarianism.

“'Americans, in particular veterans, see this as a vanity endeavor for Donald Trump,' said Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colorado), a former Army ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. 'You have massive cuts to [veterans’] health care, troops away from their families for years over the last decade fighting wars on terror, barracks falling apart in many posts — and we will spend over $50 million to roll tanks through the streets of D.C.? It doesn’t add up.'... 'For those people that want to protest, they’re going to be met with very big force,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, making no distinction between violent and peaceful demonstrators. 'And I haven’t even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country. But they will be met with very heavy force.'” 

     ~~~ Marie: What Trump is threatening is to crush people exercising their First Amendment rights to free speech and peaceable assembly. As I understand it, there are no sponsored protests in Washington, D.C., so maybe Trump won't get a chance to exercise "very heavy force" against people "that want to protest." ~~~

~~~ Jaclyn Peiser of the Washington Post: “Some supporters of ... Donald Trump are calling for a Walmart boycott after an heiress to the nation’s largest retailer took out an ad in the New York Times to promote a protest of the president’s policies. The full-page display, which appeared in the newspaper Sunday and was paid for by Christy Walton, advertises 'No Kings Day' gatherings across the country Saturday.... The ad doesn’t mention Trump by name.... In a statement to The Washington Post, a Walmart spokesman sought to distance the company from the ad. 'The advertisements from Christy Walton are in no way connected to or endorsed by Walmart,' he said. 'She does not serve on the board or play any role in decision-making at Walmart.'” ~~~

~~~ Here's Tom Sullivan's list of resources for the "No Kings Day" protests around the country:

No Kings Day, June 14th (this Saturday)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Luke Broadwater of the New York Times: “Since taking office in January, Mr. Trump has, step by step, expanded domestic use of the military, testing the legal and political limits on involving troops trained to fight foreign wars in roles traditionally carried out by the local police or Border Patrol.... [In the Los Angeles deployment,] the guard’s mission was not merely limited to protecting federal buildings from vandalism. Troops began assisting the Los Angeles police, but also Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officers as they carried out deportation raids.... Speaking to reporters, he described the military deployment to Los Angeles as 'the first, perhaps, of many.'”

Stephen Saideman in an NBC News opinion piece: "... Donald Trump ... has made a special effort to violate the standards that have long kept the U.S. military out of partisan politics.... He chose an unqualified Fox News host to be defense secretary to ensure he would not face the resistance he met from [his first-term defense secretaries, James] Mattis and [Mark] Esper. Then he fired multiple senior leaders of the military for being, well, Black or female.... Trump is dragging the U.S. military into the partisan fray, attempting to turn the American military into a Republican or Trumpian army.... Impartial militaries are a key ingredient for stable democracy, while Trump’s actions are those of an autocrat. Turning the U.S. military into an ally of one politician against his opponents is more than just another instance of democratic backsliding. It is a serious step toward ending American democracy.... Deploying the military against peaceful protests and encouraging the troops to boo members of the opposition are two decisions that get us much closer to truly catastrophic outcomes." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~ 

~~~ Konstantin Toropin & Steve Beynon of Military.com: "...what unfolded Tuesday at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, bore little resemblance to the customary visit from a president and defense secretary. There..., Donald Trump unleashed a speech laced with partisan invective, goading jeers from a crowd of soldiers positioned behind his podium.... Internal 82nd Airborne Division communications ... reveal a tightly orchestrated effort to curate the optics of Trump's recent visit, including handpicking soldiers for the audience based on political leanings and physical appearance. One unit-level message bluntly saying: 'No fat soldiers.' 'If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out,' another note to troops said.... Officials declined to comment when asked about the extent to which troops were screened, whether soldiers displaying partisan cheers on television -- a violation of long-standing Pentagon rules -- would be disciplined or if soldiers who objected to participating in the event, citing disagreements with the administration, would be disciplined or admonished in any way." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Tom Nichols of the Atlantic: “... Donald Trump continued his war against America’s most cherished military traditions today when he delivered a speech at Fort Bragg. It is too much to call it a 'speech'; it was, instead, a ramble, full of grievance and anger, just like his many political-rally performances.... He led soldiers ... in a display of unseemly behavior that ran contrary to everything the founder of the U.S. Army, George Washington, strove to imbue in the American armed forces.... Trump, himself a convicted felon, doesn’t care about rules and laws, but active-duty military members are not allowed to attend political rallies in uniform.... Senior officers of the United States military have an obligation to speak up and be leaders.  Where is the Army chief of staff, General Randy George?... Where is the commander of the airborne troops, Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, or even Colonel Chad Mixon, the base commander?... If they are truly Washington’s heirs, they should speak up — now — and stand with the first commander in chief against the rogue 47th.” Thanks to laura h. for this gift link. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Looks as if the generals will speak up if you put them under oath before Congress. See WashPo report on Joint Chief Chair Dan Caine's testimony before Congress.

Cat Zakrzewski, et al., of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump is prepared to send National Guard troops into more U.S. cities if protests against immigration raids expand beyond Los Angeles, administration officials said Wednesday, potentially opening the door to the most extensive use of military force on American soil in modern history. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in testimony to Congress that the Pentagon has the capability to surge National Guard troops to more cities 'if there are other riots in places where law enforcement officers are threatened.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt warned protesters beyond Los Angeles that more 'lawlessness' will only increase Trump’s resolve. 'Let this be an unequivocal message to left-wing radicals in other parts of the country who are thinking about copycatting the violence in an effort to stop this administration’s mass deportation efforts,' Leavitt said. 'You will not succeed.' The White House’s message coincides with a rise in bellicose language from Trump....” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I'm not sure what exactly "preparing" means here. Apparently the "preparing" Trump and Drunk Pete did to send troops into Los Angeles did not include providing those soldiers with sleeping accommodations, meals or, um, paychecks

Paul Campos in LG&$: "Gavin Newsom often comes across as kind of a tin-[eared] empty suit and a panderer to the Yeti-like cryptid known as the persuadable MAGA voter, but the guy does have a social media fastball[.] Campos reproduces a tweet from Gov. Sarah Huckleberry Sanders (R-Ark): "What's happening in California would never happen here in Arkansas because we value order over chaos." Newsom quickly tweet-replied (correctly): "Your homicide rate is literally DOUBLE California's." ~~~

     ~~~ AND how 'bout this, Sarah, you ignorant slut: ~~~

Jamelle Bouie of the New York Times: Donald “Trump thinks it is a sign of strength to send in troops to deal with protesters in Los Angeles.... You can almost feel, emanating from the White House, a libidinal desire to do violence to protesters, as if that will, in one fell swoop, consolidate the Trump administration into a Trump regime, empowered to rule America both by force and the fear of force.... The problem for Trump, however, is that this immediate, and potentially unlawful, recourse to military force isn’t a show of strength; it’s a demonstration of weakness.... Power, real power, rests on legitimacy and consent. A regime that has to deploy force at the first sign of dissent is a regime that does not actually believe it can wield power short of coercion and open threats of violence.” The link appears to be a gift link. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Rachel Maddow made the same point on Monday. But IMO, "strength" or "weakness" here is a distinction without much of a difference, at least from where most of Trump's victims sit. If Trump has deported you, or jailed you, or physically injured you, or economically hurt you and your family, the legitimacy of Trump's chest-thumping doesn't matter much. It may or may not be easier to lay low a bully, but he will put up a rapacious fight on the way down.  

Catherine Rampell of the Washington Post: “As unrest and military troops overtake Los Angeles, terrifying scenes are also unfolding in smaller communities around the country. They, too, are being invaded by what resembles a secret police force, often indistinguishable from random thugs. [Linda] Shafiroff and ... Sarah Stiner own a boutique home-design and construction firm in Great Barrington, a New England town largely populated by artists, aging hippies and affluent second-home-owners. On May 30, around 11 a.m., six armed agents showed up outside the women’s office. The agents were dressed as though they had parachuted into a war zone, rather than a small town where the crosswalks are painted in rainbows.... 'These guys had guns hanging all over them,' said Shafiroff, but they otherwise had no conformity to their dress. 'None of them had the same letters on the front of their vests. Some of them didn’t even have letters, but it said “Police” across the back.… One had light-colored jeans and sneakers on, and one had on a Red Sox hat.' The agents arrived in unmarked cars, some with out-of-state plates. The women asked to see IDs or warrants, or even the names of the alleged criminals these agents were there to track down. They refused.... [A] gardener was eventually put in the back of an unmarked car and driven away.”

Lauren Gurley, et al., of the Washington Post: “The Trump administration has ramped up investigations of companies suspected of employing undocumented immigrants, directing officials to meet audit quotas for such reviews to accelerate deportation efforts. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement division has ordered its 30 regional offices to meet quotas on inspections of employers’ documentation of their workers’ immigration status, according to three immigration lawyers and a former Department of Homeland Security government official familiar with the agency’s operations. The number of notices of inspection, known as I-9 audits, has increased 'tenfold' since January, three lawyers said. The inspections can be a precursor to workplace raids and have recently been used by the Trump administration as a method for detaining undocumented workers without judicial warrants, according to immigration advocates and lawyers. Often, undocumented workers never return to work after ICE agents serve an employer an inspection notice.” (Also linked yesterday.) 

Ben Brasch, et al., of the Washington Post: “Protests over the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement continued to spread Wednesday to cities across the United States, drawing stark warnings from the White House that it would not hesitate to expand its deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to quell demonstrations beyond Los Angeles. Hundreds of people have been arrested in recent days as events have taken place in Chicago, New York, Atlanta and various Texas cities. More are planned for the coming days in cities from Eugene, Oregon, to Raleigh, North Carolina.... The sparring at federal, state and local levels reflected partisan divisions that have only hardened in recent days as more raids and protests took place.”

Our Very Own Inspector Javert. Matt Viser & Travis Andrews of the Washington Post report on Trump's “appearance in the president’s box of the Kennedy Center Opera House for opening night of one of his favorites, the award-winning 'Les Misérables.'... The story follows a convict on parole seeking redemption, and it is based on a youth-led revolt against the French monarchy and related injustices in the 19th century.... Others see him as emblematic of the monarchy that the masses of 'Les Mis' assemble against. This weekend, anti-Trump groups are staging rallies around the country they have labeled 'No Kings' protests. And his appearance at the theater came just days after he called up the Marines and National Guard to help quash protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The man whose order has led to the tearing down of barricades in Los Angeles watched on as the heroes of the musical sang, 'Now we pledge ourselves to hold this barricade.'... As the president and first lady Melania Trump took their seats, some boos erupted in the crowd before cheers and chants of 'U.S.A.!' sought to compete.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: This is telling: "Asked before the show whether he identified more with Jean Valjean, the humble protagonist..., or Javert, the inspector who uses strict enforcement of the law to pursue Valjean, Trump responded, 'Oh, that’s a tough one … I don’t know.'” Yeah, that is a tough one, because in all the years this musical has supposedly been a Trump favorite, Trump never once thought about the meaning of Victor Hugo's novel. He doesn't realize that people like those he is oppressing are the heroes of the story. He is the villain. As Hugo himself wrote of the novel, first published during the American Civil War, “It addresses England as well as Spain, Italy as well as France, Germany as well as Ireland, the republics that harbour slaves as well as empires that have serfs.” It was just this week that Trump boasted about honoring Confederate leaders who “harboured slaves.” And see Gabriel Zucman's essay on wealth disparity linked below. Trump's Big Bad Bill is of course designed to further increase that disparity, the same sort of wealth differential that forced Jean Valjean to steal bread in the first place.

Abigail Hauslohner of the Washington Post: “Gen. Dan Caine, who since becoming chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in April has assiduously avoided the public spotlight, on Wednesday broke with ... Donald Trump’s assessment of the threat posed by Russia and the ongoing protests and violence in Los Angeles. Caine’s comments during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing were restrained but significant.... Trump has routinely downplayed alarm about Vladimir Putin’s territorial ambitions in Eastern Europe and, in an address this week, branded those in the United States protesting his immigration policies as agents of a 'foreign invasion.'... When asked by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) whether Putin intends to 'stop in Ukraine,' the general was frank: 'I don’t believe so, sir.' When pressed by Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) to say if he believes the demonstrations and violence in Los Angeles are a sign the United States is 'being invaded by a foreign nation,' as Trump told an audience of soldiers Tuesday in North Carolina, Caine said he doesn’t.... When Schatz asked if there has been a 'rebellion' against the government..., Caine declined to affirm that either....

“Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, seated beside Caine at the hearing, “tried to paper over what Caine had said.... Senate Democrats, just as their House counterparts had on Tuesday, seized the opportunity to attack Hegseth’s record of 'chaos and poor judgment' while helming the Defense Department, and his unwillingness to respond to congressional inquiries and the news media.” MB: There's a mistake in the report here. Hauslohner recounts remarks by “Sen. Chris Coons (Connecticut), the subcommittee’s top Democrat.” She refers to Coons several more times. Coons is “the subcommittee's top Democrat,” but he is not from Connecticut. Chris Murphy, who also is on the subcommittee, represents Connecticut. So I can't tell who said what. (I wrote to her to suggest she fix the affected grafs.) Update: Hauslohner fixed the mistake, but she wasn't nice enough to thank me for the tip.

Joe Gould & Connon O'Brien of Politico: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday insisted the Pentagon’s deployment of troops to Los Angeles was lawful. He just couldn’t cite the law he was following. The Pentagon chief clashed with several lawmakers at a Senate budget hearing as he sought to defend ... Donald Trump’s decision to send thousands of troops, including 700 active-duty Marines, to California in response to mass deportation protests.... Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) raised concerns about Trump politicizing the military, asking Hegseth whether he supported deploying the National Guard to the Capitol in response to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection that sought to overturn the election. Hegseth would not say. 'All I know is it’s the right decision to be deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles to defend ICE agents,' he said. Murphy called Hegseth’s response evidence of a double standard.... But it was Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the usually restrained Senate Armed Services Committee’s ranking member, who was the most forceful in tone. He raised alarms about the Los Angeles deployment, as well as several Homeland Security requests for 20,000 more troops to assist at the border, for 'military forces to detain or arrest American citizens,' and to provide drone surveillance.” ~~~

~~~ Amy Wang & Dan Lamothe of the Washington Post: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday resisted lawmakers’ demands for transparency about the luxury airplane from Qatar that ... Donald Trump wants to use as Air Force One, rebuffing several sharp questions about the Boeing 747-8 jetliner and the terms surrounding its transfer to the U.S. government.... When Sen. Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island) asked, for instance, how long it might take for a contractor to reconfigure the aircraft..., Hegseth said that information was 'not for public consumption.' Hegseth also said he could not reveal the cost of such a contract [which according to Hegseth has not been signed], a rebuff that appeared to anger the usually low-key Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. 'Why can’t it be revealed in this setting?' Reed snapped. 'This is the Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate. We appropriate the money that you will spend after it’s authorized by my committee.' Reed criticized the secrecy shrouding the Trump administration’s deal with Qatar and said the plane was 'not only a bad deal for the American public' but also about 'gratifying the president’s ego.'... 'We’re talking about a pretty massive investment of appropriations dollars into a plane that the secretary is saying is currently planned to be transferred personally to the president,' [Sen. Chris] Murphy [D-Conn.] concluded. 'There’s a lot of other pending needs that we need to fund. This would seem to be low on the list.'” Retrofitting the Qatari plane could not be finished until a few months before two new Boeings to be used as AF1 are scheduled to be completed. 

Jonah Bromwich of the New York Times: “A federal judge on Wednesday barred the Trump administration from continuing to detain Mahmoud Khalil under a rarely cited law invoked by the secretary of state — and suggested that Mr. Khalil could be released as early as Friday. However, the judge, Michael E. Farbiarz, paused his own order to give the administration a chance to appeal, saying it would not go into effect until 9:30 a.m. on Friday. And he left a pathway for the government to continue to detain Mr. Khalil for other reasons, though he suggested he would be skeptical were authorities to do so. It was not clear whether the administration would appeal the order.... Though Judge Farbiarz took longer than judges assessing similar cases to arrive at the conclusion that Mr. Khalil should not be detained, he also took a deeper look at the core constitutional issues informing the case, ultimately concluding that the law [Marco] Rubio invoked could not be used as grounds for deportation.... Mr. Khalil ... has been held in Louisiana for three months without being accused of a crime.” (Also linked yesterday.) 

Anne Applebaum of the Atlantic: Donald Trump's “military deployment in Los Angeles follows a long, disturbing tradition.... doubt very much that Donald Trump knows a lot about the methods of Bolsheviks or Maoists, although I am certain that some of his entourage does. But he is now leading an assault on what some around him call the administrative state, which the rest of us call the U.S. government. This assault is revolutionary in nature. Trump’s henchmen have a set of radical, sometimes competing goals, all of which require fundamental changes in the nature of the American state. The concentration of power in the hands of the president. The replacement of the federal civil service with loyalists. The transfer of resources from the poor to the rich, especially rich insiders with connections to Trump. The removal, to the extent possible, of brown-skinned people from America, and the return to an older American racial hierarchy.... Now Trump faces the same choice as his revolutionary predecessors: Give up — or radicalize.... Like his revolutionary predecessors, Trump has chosen radicalization and polarization, and he is openly seeking to provoke violence.... For the moment, the administration’s demonstration of force is mostly performative, a made-for-TV show....” This is a gift link via digby.

 

~~~ More Than Anything Else, He's Sorry for Himself. Jonathan Swan & Theodore Schleifer of the New York TimesDonald “Trump received a phone call from Elon Musk late on Monday night, outreach that led to a public expression of regret by the billionaire early Wednesday for the attacks he had lodged against the president in their extraordinary public showdown last week, according to three people briefed on the conversation. The call came after the tech entrepreneur spoke privately on Friday with Vice President JD Vance and the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles, about a path to a truce.... Those conversations paved the way for the strikingly chastened tone Mr. Musk struck in an X post early Wednesday, in which he wrote: 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.'” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: As Lawrence O'Donnell pointed out last night, Musk's "apology" is entirely self-serving. He is not sorry for the estimated 300,000 children around the world he has effectively killed by cutting off relatively minor USAID funds or the havoc he has wreaked in the U.S. government by firing civil servants and vital cancelling domestic programs.

Sheryl Stolberg of the New York Times: “Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight doctors and researchers, including two prominent critics of federal scientists and the Biden administration’s Covid vaccine policies, to replace roughly half the members he fired from an expert panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mr. Kennedy made the announcement Wednesday on the social media platform X, two days after he fired all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.... But the appointments of at least two of the new members — Martin Kulldorff and Dr. Robert Malone — are likely to draw an uproar from pro-vaccine groups. Both were highly critical of President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s coronavirus vaccine policies during the pandemic.” The story has been updated since posted here at 6:15 pm ET Wednesday. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Mike Stobbe of the AP: “The new appointees include Vicky Pebsworth ... who has been listed as a board member and volunteer director for the National Vaccine Information Center, a group that is widely considered to be a leading source of vaccine misinformation. Another is Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he’s promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots and has suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He’s downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years.” (Also linked yesterday.)

China, China, Here We Come, Right Back to Where We Started From. Ana Swanson of the New York Times: “After two days of tense negotiations, the United States and China appear to have walked back from the brink of a devastating economic conflict — maybe. Officials from the two countries reached a handshake agreement in the early hours of Wednesday in London to remove some of the harmful measures they had used to target each other’s economies as part of a clash that rapidly intensified in recent months. It remains unclear whether the truce will hold — or crumble like one struck in May did. Even if the agreement does prove durable, its big accomplishment appears to be merely returning the countries to a status quo from several months ago, before ... [Donald] Trump provoked tensions with China in early April by ramping up tariffs on goods it produces.... Veronique de Rugy ... [of] the Mercatus Center, a libertarian think tank[, said,] 'This deal suggests there was never a real plan.'... Wendy Cutler, the vice president of the Asia Society and a former U.S. trade negotiator, said the United States 'appears to have paid a heavy price' for regaining access to Chinese critical minerals and magnets.... Analysts and experts argued that the events of recent weeks showed that the Trump administration had overplayed its hand against China.... In a report this week, the World Bank said U.S. tariffs would set the stage for the weakest decade of global growth since the 1960s.” Here's an Ars Technica report. Trump announced the lousy deal in an all-caps social media boast that for some reason didn't mention he had created a major fiasco from which the U.S. has gained nothing. ~~~

     ~~~ AND Heather Cox Richardson points to this tongue-in-cheek analysis by U. Michigan economist Justin Wolfers: “The US & Chinese trade negotiators have negotiated a handshake agreement to seek signoff to agree that a previously-agreed agreement was still their agreed upon agreement. (That agreement is not an agreement but a framework for seeking future agreements).... Notice that not only are we not getting a better deal, we’re not even getting back to where we were at the start of the Administration.”

Lisa Friedman of the New York Times: “The Trump administration moved Wednesday to erase limits on greenhouse gases from power plants and to weaken restrictions on their other hazardous emissions, including mercury, arsenic and lead. Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, hailed a 'historic day' and said the proposed changes would unshackle the coal, oil and gas industries from 'expensive, unreasonable and burdensome regulations'  imposed by the Biden administration. Together, the moves mark a major blow to efforts to tackle climate change and to reduce threats to public health. The power sector is the country’s second largest source of pollution that is heating the planet, behind transportation. The Trump administration is pursuing an aggressive agenda to bolster the production and use of fossil fuels, while also scrapping policies that reduce planet-warming emissions.” ~~~

     ~~~ Oliver Milman of the Guardian: “More than 200 health experts wrote to the EPA on Wednesday warning the moves 'would lead to the biggest pollution increases in decades and is a blatant give-away to polluters'. The experts added the reversals are 'a direct contradiction to the Environmental Protection Agency’s mission of protecting public health and the environment'.”

Another Trumpy Threat Against a U.S. Ally. Victoria Kim of the New York Times: “The Trump administration is reviewing whether a deal to equip Australia with nuclear submarines is 'aligned with the president’s America First agenda,' sowing doubt on the future of the landmark agreement between the United States, Britain and Australia, which is meant to counter China’s rise in the Asia Pacific. News of the Pentagon’s review of the security pact dominated headlines on Thursday in Australia, which has made the deal the centerpiece of its defense in the coming decades and has already invested heavily in the industrial base and training needed to maintain and build the submarines. The decision to review the accord, which was reached in 2021 during President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s administration, appeared to reinforce ... [Donald] Trump’s skeptical and transactional approach to longstanding alliances, including demands that allies spend more on their own defense.”

Edward Wong of the New York Times: “The dozen board members of the prestigious Fulbright program that promotes international educational exchanges resigned on Wednesday because of what they said was political interference by the Trump administration in their operations.... The members are concerned that political appointees at the State Department, which manages the program, are acting illegally by canceling the awarding of Fulbright scholarships to almost 200 American professors and researchers who are prepared to go to universities and other research institutions overseas starting this summer, said the people, including Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat of New Hampshire. The board approved those scholars over the winter after a yearlong selection process, and the State Department was supposed to send acceptance letters by April, the people said. But instead, the board learned that the office of public diplomacy at the agency had begun sending rejection letters to the scholars based mainly on their research topics, they said. In addition, the department is reviewing the applications of about 1,200 scholars from other countries who have already been approved by the board to come to the United States, the people said.” Looks like a gift link. Read on for details. (Also linked yesterday.) The CBS News story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: My husband was on the Fulbright board. If I'm not mistaken, Ronald Reagan appointed him. My husband was not a Republican and was not active in politics beyond, you know, voting.

“You Were Not Invited.” Martine Powers & Theodoric Meyer  of the Washington Post: “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the Trump administration has excluded him and his family from a congressional picnic at the White House in what he believes to be an act of retribution, politicizing an annual celebration of bipartisanship over Paul’s refusal to support the president’s signature legislation. 'We just tried to get our tickets today, and they said, “You were not invited,’” Paul told reporters outside the Capitol on Wednesday.... The congressional picnic is a time-honored tradition dating back decades — intended to serve as a symbol of nonpartisan bonhomie between political leaders. The White House typically invites all members of the House and Senate, along with their families, for one of the few times each year that administration officials and representatives of both parties gather to socialize.”

Gabriel Zucman in the Guardian: “... unprecedented wealth concentration – and the unbridled power that comes with such wealth – has distorted our democracy and is driving societal and economic tensions. [Elon] Musk ... wields power no one person should have. He has used this power to elect candidates that will enact policies to protect his interests and he even bought his way into government.... Musk dramatically reshaped the government in ways that benefit him – for instance, slashing regulatory agencies investigating his businesses – and hollowed out spending to make way for tax cuts that would enrich him.... ... Just 800 families in the US are collectively worth almost $7tn – a record-breaking figure that exceeds the wealth of the bottom half of the US combined.... Under the current federal income tax system, over half of the real-world income available to the top 0.1% of wealth-holders (those with $62m or more) goes totally untaxed. As a result, billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos have gotten away with paying zero dollars in federal income taxes in some years, even when their real sources of income were soaring.” Thanks to laura h. for the link. (Also linked yesterday.) 

Shane Goldmacher of the New York Times: “David Hogg, the young vice chair of the Democratic National Committee who divided the party over his plans to intervene in primary races against sitting Democratic lawmakers, said that he would step aside from his prominent post after the party voted to force him to run again on Wednesday. Mr. Hogg, 25, became a lightning rod for criticism within the party after he told The New York Times two months ago that he planned to spend millions of dollars on primaries through a separate group, Leaders We Deserve, that he leads. He said he was raising as much as $20 million to help bring generational change to the Democratic Party. On Wednesday, the Democratic National Committee announced that its members had voted to force new elections for the vice chair, posts held by Mr. Hogg and another vice chair, Malcolm Kenyatta.” This is a gift link. Goldmacher outlines the backstory, which I've mostly ignored. Politico's story is here.

~~~~~~~~~~

Florida Celebrates Spanish History with an Inquisition. Judd Legum, et al., of Popular Information: "In a chilling meeting of the Florida State Board of Education last week, a school district superintendent was publicly browbeaten and repeatedly threatened with criminal prosecution. The members of the State Board were incensed that Van Ayres, the Superintendent of Hillsborough County [Tampa area] Public Schools, had not unilaterally and permanently removed a list of 55 books from school libraries. While Florida Republicans have defended removing books from public school libraries in the name of 'parents' rights,' no Hillsborough County parent had objected to the books at issue. Rather, the State Board had summarily declared that the 55 books were 'pornography,' even though none of the books met the legal definition of pornographic material. Many of the books targeted by the State Board are award-winning literature that have been read by students for years.... Kelly Garcia, who was appointed to the State Board by Governor Ron DeSantis (R) in 2023, suggested that librarians in Hillsborough County were illiterate and told Ayres they lacked a 'single shred of decency.'  She described the librarians as 'child abusers' and asked if Ayres had considered firing all of them.... The Florida State Board of Education’s effort to remove any books with sexual content, despite the wishes of parents in Hillsborough County, mirrors a legislative push that failed in the Florida State Senate this year." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The school librarians whom Garcia characterized in a public meeting as child abusers should sue her individually and in her capacity as a member of the board. What could be more defamatory and threatening than accusing people of child abuse, particular people whose professions required them to work with children? 

~~~~~~~~~~

Israel. Isabel Kershner of the New York Times: “A motion by opposition parties to dissolve the Israeli Parliament failed in the early hours of Thursday morning. But the vote itself presented the most serious challenge yet to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing government, exposing splits in the ruling coalition and weakening his leadership credentials. Fifty-three of the 120 Parliament members voted for the dissolution bill, including two members of the governing coalition, while a majority of 61 opposed it. Despite the defeat, representatives of the opposition parties said that they had nevertheless managed to drive a wedge into the coalition’s ranks. By bringing the bill to a vote, the opposition parties planned to exploit a fight within the governing coalition over the contentious, decades-old policy that has largely exempted ultra-Orthodox men who are studying religion in seminaries from compulsory military service.” MB: IOW, they're fighting over the wrong thing. ~~~

~~~ Michael Crowley, et al., of the New York Times: “Israel appears to be preparing to launch an attack soon on Iran, according to officials in the United States and Europe.... The concern about a potential Israeli strike and the prospect of retaliation by Iran led the United States on Wednesday to withdraw diplomats from Iraq and authorize the voluntary departure of U.S. military family members from the Middle East. It is unclear how extensive an attack Israel might be preparing. But the rising tensions come after months in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has pressed ... [Donald] Trump to seize on what Israel sees as a moment of Iranian vulnerability to a strike.” The CBS News story is here.