The Commentariat -- January 18, 2015

Afternoon Update:

Eric Levitz of New York: "If the wealthiest 62 billionaires on the planet decided to pool their resources, they could buy up every last thing owned by the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of humanity, according to a new report from Oxfam. The report, which was released just as some of those billionaires were arriving in Davos for the World Economic Forum, shows that the gap between rich and poor has grown wider in recent years: In 2010, the bottom half owned as much as the richest 338 individuals.Analyzing data collected by Credit Suisse, the anti-poverty organization further reports that the global one percent controlled as much wealth as the bottom 99 percent in 2015 -- a milestone that was reached one year earlier than Oxfam had previously predicted."

Peter Baker of the New York Times: "The Iranian authorities held the wife and mother of the journalist Jason Rezaian without telephones for hours in a separate room at a Tehran airport on Sunday before finally agreeing under American pressure to let them leave along with prisoners released in an exchange with the United States. The last-minute conflict came close to unraveling a prisoner swap that was negotiated during 14 months of secret talks and that had already been announced to the world. In the end, Mr. Rezaian's wife and mother were permitted to fly with him to Europe later on Sunday, but the episode underscored that parts of Iran's factionalized system still strongly resist any rapprochement with the United States."

The Guardian is liveblogging the parliamentary debate about whether to ban Donald Trump from the U.K.

The horse-race touts called the Democratic debate for Bernie Sanders, by a nose.

Katie Zezima of the Washington Post: President Tailgunner Tedwould get rid of a lot of stuff. Like the IRS, the ACA & ISIS.

Henry Farrell in the Washington Post: Bill O'Reilly says that if Bernie Sanders is elected president, he will move to Ireland to escape Sanders-style socialism. Yes, Ireland, where "the effective top Irish income tax rate is a little over half of income"; where the government runs the hospitals & "everyone is entitled to free basic health care in hospitals"; where welfare benefits are far more generous than in the U.S.; & where Billo would not be able to own a handgun (luckily for his family). And the government is even promising to liberalize its draconian anti-abortion laws. Thanks to D.C. Clark for the link.

*****

Peter Baker, et al., of the New York Times: "The Obama administration announced Sunday that it was imposing new, more limited sanctions on some Iranian citizens and companies for violating United Nations resolutions against ballistic missile tests. The move came less than 24 hours after the White House lifted broader sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program. The announcement, which was prepared several weeks ago but delayed by the Treasury Department, was made shortly after a Swiss plane carrying Americans freed by the Iranian authorities departed Tehran. The release of the Americans came a day after Iran and the United States concluded delicate negotiations on a prisoner exchange tied indirectly to the completion of a nuclear agreement. President Obama on Sunday hailed the agreements with Iran as the beginning of what he hoped would be a new era of constructive relations between two nations, which have been long estranged over ideology and regional ambitions":

... The transcript, via the White House, is here. CW: You'll want to read it or listen to the President's speech. Eat your hearts out, Republicans, including you, George W. Bush. ...

... And you too, Bibi. Steven Erlanger of the New York Times: "Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned on Sunday that Israel would ensure that Tehran never obtains nuclear weapons, while also taking credit for keeping Iran from already having them." ...

... Carol Morello of the Washington Post: "Washington Post correspondent Jason Rezaian and two other Americans released from an Iranian prison landed Sunday at Ramstein Air Base in Germany and were expected to be whisked immediately to the nearby U.S. military medical center at Landstuhl. Rezaian is accompanied by his mother and his wife, Yeganeh Salehi, an Iranian who was allowed to leave the country with him.... Although the prisoners were released Saturday, the Swiss Air plane that was there to take them out of Iran was delayed many hours before takeoff. Administration officials said [President] Obama waited to speak only after their departure was confirmed. Secretary of State John F. Kerry said the delay was due to last-minute misunderstandings over whether Rezaian's mother, Mary Rezaian, and his wife were on the flight manifest. The departure was also complicated by flight crew rest rules, he said." ...

... Sari Horwitz, et al., of the Washington Post: "President Obama offered clemency to seven Iranians charged with violating U.S. trade sanctions against Iran as part of a historic prisoner agreement with Iran that freed four Americans Saturday.... The Iranians, six of whom are dual U.S.-Iranian citizens, were imprisoned or were awaiting trial in the United States. The U.S. government dismissed charges against 14 other Iranians, all outside the United States, after assessing that extradition requests were unlikely to be successful, according to a U.S. official.... Obama insisted that none of the individuals be 'people who have been prosecuted for offenses related to terrorism ... or violent crime.'" The reporters provide some details on those who received clemency. ...

... Peter Baker, et al., tell how the negotiations for the prisoner release went down: "... it took 14 months of turbulent talks punctuated by high diplomatic drama and multiple near-collapses that paralleled the final year of nuclear negotiations." ...

     ... Carol Morello & Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post tell the story from the Post's perspective. The Post was actively involved in trying to get Rezaian & his family out of Iran.

Jeffrey Collins of the AP: "The [South Carolina] NAACP said there is still more work to do to honor [Dr. Martin Luther] King[,Jr.] and the theme of this year's rally is 'education equity,' with speakers calling for South Carolina to spend more money to help students in poorer, more rural school districts, which frequently have a majority of black students. And this year's event will also include appearances by all three main Democratic presidential candidates -- Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley. The rally in Columbia is one of many planned nationwide recalling the legacy of King...." ...

... Muster Up, People -- It's Robert E. Lee Day. AP: "In three southern states [-- Alabama, Mississippi & Arkansas --] on Monday, civil rights hero Martin Luther King Jr and civil war Confederate commander General Robert E Lee will share a common holiday. In Arkansas, however, they will do so for perhaps the final time. Asa Hutchinson, the state's Republican governor, is pushing to separate the joint celebration after critics said it is an insult to the man who fought to end racial segregation to share a day with a man who fought to preserve slavery.... In January 2015, Arkansas lawmakers defeated a bill that would have reserved the January date for King and established a memorial day, although not a holiday, for Lee in November.... Hutchinson wants lawmakers to pass legislation that gives King a day of his own...." ...

... The Native American Slave Trade. Rebecca Onion of Slate: "Europeans didn't just displace Native Americans -- they enslaved them, and encouraged tribes to participate in the slave trade, on a scale historians are only beginning to fathom.... The practice dates back to the earliest history of the European colonies in the future United States." ...

... Joan Quigley, in a Washington Post op-ed, on Mary Church Terrell, the Washington, D.C., civil rights activist whose suit to desegregate District restaurants, the Supreme Court decided in her favor in 1953, a year before its landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision that overturned the "separate but equal" doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)." CW: Brown did not arise sui generis. There were a number of desegregation cases, like this one (the NAACP brought most of them), that anticipated Brown.

Rick Hasen in the Washington Post: "... money doesn't buy elections. Instead, it increases the odds of electoral victory and of getting one's way on policies, tax breaks and government contracts. And the presidential race is the place we are least likely to see money's effects. Looking to Congress and the states, though, we can see that the era of big money unleashed by the Supreme Court is hurtling us toward a plutocracy in which the people with the greatest economic power can wield great political power through campaign donations and lobbying.... Money can matter more to the outcomes of congressional and state races because of relative scale. Millions of dollars spent in these contests can swamp the competition and help swing close elections, especially by influencing low-information voters." ...

... Tom Hamburger of the of the Washington Post reviews Dark Money, Jane Mayer's book on the Koch brothers. Even the review is riveting.

Presidential Race

Rumble! Patrick Healy & Amy Chozick of the New York Times: "Hillary Clinton targeted Bernie Sanders's electoral appeal with some of her strongest language yet in a debate on Sunday night, seizing on Mr. Sanders's recent policy shifts on universal health care and gun control to try to undercut his image as an anti-political truth teller. Mrs. Clinton also repeatedly aligned herself with a former political rival, President Obama, as she sought to portray her current one, Mr. Sanders, as a fringe candidate who did not stand with Mr. Obama on major issues like Wall Street regulation. Mr. Sanders, in turn, gave no quarter as he criticized Mrs. Clinton as dishonest in her attacks." ...

... CW: I saw only a tiny portion of the debate, and in that tiny portion, here was my visceral impression: Screeching Harridan Attacks Bumbling Old Guy; Milquetoast Can't Break Up the Fight. The Bickersons & their mousy neighbor are not going to Make America Great Again, which is to say, the Democratic candidates all made Donald Trump look pretty good. But not Ted Cruz. He's still the worst. No wonder Wasserman Schultz wants to hide these people (see link below). I take it all back, Debbie. You're a trooper for the party! ...

... The Washington Post has an "annotated" transcript. Click on the highlighted text & an "annotator"'s comment/tweet pops up in a sidebar. ...

... Margaret Hartmann of New York reprises some of the low moments. ...

... Lisa Hagen of the Hill: "... Bernie Sanders repeated Sunday that Bill Clinton's past marital infidelities are 'deplorable' but indicated he isn't interested in talking about them. 'That question annoys me,' Sanders said at the Democratic debate in South Carolina when asked whether he regretted calling the former president's actions 'totally disgraceful and unacceptable.'... Asked by NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell why he answered the question, Sanders said: 'I was asked a question. Then if I don't answer, then it's another front-page story. Yes, his behavior was deplorable,' Sanders continued. 'But I'm going to debate Secretary Clinton and Gov. [Martin] O'Malley on the issues facing the American people' and not on Bill Clinton's personal life." ...

... Daniel Strauss of Politico: "... Hillary Clinton didn't want to leave Sunday night's Democratic presidential debate without addressing one topic that didn't come up until she mentioned it: Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder's handling of a contaminated water crisis in Flint, Michigan.... Sanders joined with Clinton in condemning Snyder's handing of the situation." ...

     ... Rebecca Leber of the New Republic: "Note that the answer came from Clinton, and not debate moderators, who can't be trusted to give environmental and climate challenges any serious attention." CW: I know that "journalists" like gonzo stories, so "earth slowly becoming inhabitable" doesn't thrill them, but isn't "governor secretly poisons & kills residents" dramatic enough for them?

... Glenn Kessler & Michelle Lee of the Post fact-check some of the candidate's claims. Their fact-check is fairly useful as they explain, among other things, Sanders' votes on gun-control legislation. ...

... Benjamin Wallace-Wells of the New Yorker puts Sanders' position on gun control in the context of Vermont's history: "At least as interesting as the story of how Sanders worked to change Vermont is what he decided he was comfortable with, and not to challenge or change at all." ...

... Calvin Woodward of the AP does a brief fact-check of debate claims. ...

... Brian Beutler had a more positive view of the Democratic debate than did I -- probably helped to watch more than five minutes: "By contrast with Tuesday night's rancorous Republican primary debate, the three remaining Democratic candidates were able to argue with one another for two hours Sunday without questioning anyone's citizenship, threatening to bomb countries, or letting Donald Trump almost entirely off the hook. But one of the most fundamental political differences between the parties at the moment is that Republican officials don't want their frontrunner to win their presidential nomination, and Democrats do. And in that sense, Sunday's Democratic debate was almost as dire for professional Democrats as Tuesday's was for Republicans.... Bernie Sanders really is a formidable opponent who will be hard to fend off in Iowa and New Hampshire.... Hillary Clinton is a candidate who could pull it off." ...

... Paul Waldman (in the Washington Post) homes in, as he has done before, on the difference between Hillary's (and Obama's) pragmatism & Bernie's revolutionary vision. ...

... Ed Kilgore: "Alas for the Sanders campaign..., according to the latest Gallup weekly presidential job approval tracking poll, [President Obama's] rating among Democrats is 84 percent.... It is extremely difficult for Sanders to make his case that HRC is too close to Wall Street or too militaristic or too timid on domestic policy without co-indicting the incumbent president.Hillary Clinton understands that, which is why she took so much care in the NBC debate to identify her approach to regulation of Wall Street with Obama's; to defend Obamacare in contrast to Sanders' advocacy of a single-payer health care system; to remind Democrats she was a major architect of Obama's foreign policy; and to refuse opportunities to separate herself from Obama even though some consultants probably think she'll need to do that to win a general election."

Alan Rappeport of the New York Times provides a list of ways you can watch the Democratic presidential candidates debate Sunday night. NBC is broadcasting the debate live at 9 pm ET. ...

... Jason Horowitz of the New York Times: "Michaeleen Crowell, 41, is a policy wonk whose day job is chief of staff in Mr. Sanders's Senate office. But in her off hours these days, she is the senator's practice Hillary." ...

... Bradford Richardson of the Hill: "Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) on Sunday said she scheduled primary debates with the goal of maximizing media attention for the party's presidential candidates.... She said scheduling more debates would 'take away' from opportunities for voters to see candidates in person on the campaign trail.... Wasserman Schultz's comments come before Sunday night's debate on NBC, a day before Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and on the same night as a National Football League playoff game. The next debate will come on Feb. 11, after both the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary." CW: At least we know how stupid Wasserman Schultz thinks we are.

Gabriel Debenedetti of Politico: "Bernie Sanders released the details of his 'Medicare for all' single-payer healthcare plan just two hours before the Democrats debate here on Sunday night, putting a cap on weeks of wrangling between his team and Hillary Clinton's over the plan's details."...

... ** Ezra Klein: "On Sunday night, mere hours before the fourth Democratic debate, Sanders tried to head off Clinton's attacks by releasing his plan. Only what he released isn't a plan. It is, to be generous, a gesture towards a future plan."

... Gabriel Debenedetti: "After weeks of fighting with Hillary Clinton's campaign over his gun control record, Bernie Sanders on Saturday night said he backs new legislation that amends a controversial 2005 law on which he voted to limit liability on gun manufacturers. That vote has been at the center of substantial sniping from Clinton allies, and the former secretary of state has been using it as an example of Sanders being out of step with the party on gun control. 'I'm pleased that this legislation is being introduced,' said Sanders of legislation from Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Rep. Adam Schiff." ...

... Isaac Arnsdorf of Politico: "Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday dismissed questions raised by a Hillary Clinton ally about his health and promised to release his medical records. 'Of course, we're going to release our medical records,' the Democratic presidential hopeful said on CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'Thank God, I am very healthy. We will get our medical records out the same way that Secretary Clinton has gotten her records out. It is not a problem.'" ...

... Paul Krugman joins the debate on healthcare legislation & sides with Hillary Clinton for practical reasons. CW: However, Krugman does favor the public option, which -- as far as I know, & I may be wrong -- Clinton has not spoken to in this election cycle (or ever??). The public option would leave private insurance in place but would allow consumers to opt-in to a "Medicare for all" type of insurance, which is Sanders' basic proposal (update: tho, as Ezra Klein explains above, Sanders' idea actually is different from Medicare in several aspects). So Krugman, in a way, seems to be think they're both right. ...

... Kristen East of Politico: "Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz have the greatest chances of winning the Iowa caucuses two weeks from Monday, new polling-based forecasts from FiveThirtyEight show." CW: If you like statistics, you'll want to read Nate Silver's 538 piece (linked (2nd here); my eyes glazed over.

** The Ignoramuses. Fred Kaplan of Slate: "The events of the past week reveal a few things about the Republican critique of Obama's foreign policy. First, it is completely uninformed on substantive grounds: The jeremiads against the nuclear accord in particular reflect a deep-seated ignorance of what's in the nuclear deal. Second, it is completely uninformed on procedural grounds: The candidates know nothing about the diplomatic back-and-forth that produced the nuclear deal, the prisoner release, or the release earlier this week of the 10 U.S. sailors who'd somehow crossed into Iranian territorial waters. Trump rails against the 'stupid' deals concocted by 'political hacks': If the deals were what he says they are, he might have a point. But they aren't, and he doesn't."

Banned in Britain? Griff Witte of the Washington Post: Britain's House of Commons will hold a debate today on whether or not to ban Donald Trump from Great Britain. "The parliamentary debate was triggered when more than a half-million people signed an online petition arguing that Trump should be outlawed from visiting Britain because of his call last month to ban Muslims from entering the United States. Trump's proposal, petitioners said, amounted to 'hate speech.'" ...

... McKay Coppins of BuzzFeed in a New York Times op-ed: "... while [Donald Trump's] anti-Muslim provocations have rightly drawn the largest share of public outrage, Mr. Trump has in fact been using his bully pulpit throughout this election season to attack religious minorities of all stripes. He deploys this tactic on the campaign trail whenever it suits his political purposes, and his religious digs and dog whistles are often so cartoonishly retro that they sound as if they're being delivered by a billionaire Archie Bunker." CW: That's it! "a billionaire Archie Bunker." ...

... John Santucci of ABC News: "... Donald Trump is turning up the heat on his fiercest rival in the Hawkeye State -– Sen. Ted Cruz. 'I don't think Ted Cruz has a great chance, to be honest with you,' Trump told ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos in an interview on 'This Week' Sunday. 'Look, the truth is, he's a nasty guy.... Nobody likes him. Nobody in Congress likes him. Nobody likes him anywhere once they get to know him.... You can't make deals with people like that and it's not a good thing. It's not a good thing for the country. Very nasty guy.... He's a total hypocrite.... He wants to look like Robin Hood that he's the one protecting the people from the banks while he's actually borrowing money and personally guaranteeing it and not disclosing it, which is illegal.'" With clips. ...

... David Edwards of the Raw Story: Chris Wallace of "Fox 'News' Sunday" takes apart Ted Cruz's "carpet-bombing ISIS" plan, but Cruz insists "We will utterly destroy them." Because "GOP candidate = saber-rattler." This does not require making any sense. ...

... LOL. Bradford Richardson: "... Marco Rubio on Sunday said he bought a firearm on Christmas Eve in order to protect his family from a potential Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terrorist attack." CW: It's much more likely that Marco will shoot a family member than an ISIS terrorist. But since when does a presidential candidate have to be rational? ...

... Amnesty! Isaac Arnsdorf: "Sen. Marco Rubio says people who immigrated to the U.S. illegally but haven't committed any major crimes could be allowed to stay. In an interview airing Sunday on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' the Florida contender for the Republican presidential nomination said felons shouldn't be allowed to stay, but those who commit lesser crimes could still qualify. In this interview, he didn't specify whether those allowed to stay would ever be able to become citizens."

Congressional Race

Mike Lillis of the Hill: Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) "has infuriated many Democrats with her handling of the party's presidential primary debates. She drew further howls from liberals for deeming a whole generation of young women 'complacent' about their abortion freedoms. And now she's facing a primary challenge from a liberal Wall Street reformer who says she's a corporate shill detached from her district....Timothy Canova, a professor at the Shepard Broad College of Law in Florida's Nova Southeastern University, says Wasserman Schultz's positions on trade, criminal justice, consumer protection and drug policy reform -- among others -- are evidence that she's sold out to corporate interests at the expense of her constituents. It marks the first primary challenge to Wasserman Schultz since her arrival on Capitol Hill in 2005."

Beyond the Beltway

Daniel Bethencourt of the Detroit Free Press: "As Flint's water crisis reached a new national spotlight this week, director and Flint native Michael Moore held a rally in the city on Saturday, where he accused government leaders of intentionally poisoning thousands of people. 'This is not a mistake,' Moore said of the crisis. 'Ten people have been killed here because of a political decision. They did this. They knew.'" ...

... The Free Press Editors want to see the e-mails & other Snyder administration correspondence & records regarding the Flint water contamination, even though "Michigan law privileges all of that information, shielding it from the Freedom of Information Act...." ...

... Paul Egan of the Free Press: "Last year at this time, Gov. Rick Snyder was boasting about the state;s financial accomplishments, toying with a presidential run, and delivering a State of the State address that said his administration would ensure all Michigan residents could be pulled along by Michigan's 'river of opportunity.' But as Snyder prepares to deliver his sixth State of the State address on Tuesday, his political capital has plummeted, the state is grappling with what could be a billion-dollar mistake with incalculable consequences for human lives, and his river analogy is particularly unfortunate...." ...

... Tom Sullivan, in Hullabaloo, connects the Flin"t fiasco to "The Big Short." It's about the money. Sullivan does admit, "Okay, it is not immediately clear exactly how the decision to switch Flint's water source from Lake Huron to the Flint River makes somebody money. But given the history, you can smell it." ...

... Sullivan doesn't mention it, but there's this lovely entrepreneur who hopes to make $2.4BB off California's drought, pumping water from underground sources in the Mojave Desert to Los Angeles & other Southern California cities. Rupert Neate of the Guardian reports, republished in the New Republic.

Kelly House of the Oregonian: "As the standoff led by Arizona businessman Ammon Bundy entered its third week at the refuge headquarters, accusations swirled that Child Protective Services workers had begun visiting some of the occupiers' families. Meanwhile, a visit to the refuge from land conservationists devolved into a shouting match, complete with a bullhorn and name-calling, after the group tried to address news reporters. The spectacle erupted just after occupiers arrived for a morning news briefing with a wicker basket full of surveillance cameras they removed Friday from a transformer station outside Burns." Because the cameras violate their Fourth Amendment protections. Uh-huh.

Ellen McCarthy of the Washington Post: "The sexual assault case against Bill Cosby could face a new hurdle, according to CNN. As first reported on Friday, the network has revealed details of an email outlining a verbal agreement made by a former district attorney [of Montgomery County, Pa.,] assuring the comedian that the contents of his deposition in a 2005 civil proceeding would not be used against him in a criminal case."

News Ledes

CNN: "Glenn Frey, a founding member of the rock band the Eagles, has died at 67, a publicist for the band has confirmed." ...

     ... Update: A New York Times obituary is here.

AFP: "US and Iraqi authorities were searching on Monday for three Americans who were kidnapped in Baghdad, the latest group of foreign nationals abducted in recent months. The three US nationals were kidnapped from a 'suspicious apartment', a security official said, using language implying the location was a brothel."

AP: "French President Francois Hollande pledged Monday to redefine France's business model and declared what he called 'a state of economic and social emergency,' unveiling a 2-billion-euro ($2.2 billion) plan to revive hiring and catch up with a fast-moving world economy."

The Commentariat -- January 17, 2016

David Sanger of the New York Times: "International inspectors confirmed Saturday that Iran had dismantled large sections of its nuclear program, as agreed in a historic accord last summer, paving the way for the lifting of oil and financial sanctions by the United States and other world powers. The announcement came just hours after Iran said it had released four Americans, including The Washington Post reporter, Jason Rezaian, as part of a prisoner swap with the United States. American officials said the two deals were negotiated separately, but Secretary of State John Kerry had made it clear in recent weeks that he was engaged in behind-the-scenes talks on the fate of the Americans, and clearly wanted the issue cleared up before the nuclear agreement went into effect." ...

... Here's the statement by IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano. ...

... Lesley Wroughton, et al., of Reuters: "The day before the Obama administration was due to slap new sanctions on Iran late last month, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif warned U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry the move could derail a prisoner deal the two sides had been negotiating in secret for months. Kerry and other top aides to President Barack Obama, who was vacationing in Hawaii, convened a series of conference calls and concluded they could not risk losing the chance to free Americans held by Tehran. At the last minute, the Obama administration officials decided to delay a package of limited and targeted sanctions intended to penalize Iran for recent test-firings of a ballistic missile capable of delivering a nuclear warhead."

Capitalism Is Awesome, Ctd. Aaron Davis & Sarah Harnack of the Washington Post: "Walmart abruptly announced Friday that it was abandoning a promise to build stores in Washington's poorest neighborhoods, an agreement that had been key to the deal allowing the retailer to begin operating in the nation's capital.... But news that Walmart would pull out of two supercenters planned for east of the Anacostia River, where its wares and jobs are wanted most, shocked D.C. leaders.... 'I'm blood mad,' D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) said at a Friday news conference." CW: Corporations are people, my friend, and they lie.

Paul Egan & Tod Spangler of the Detroit Free Press: "President Barack Obama on Saturday declared a federal emergency in Flint, freeing up to $5 million in federal aid to immediately assist with the public health crisis, but he denied Gov. Rick Snyder's request for a disaster declaration. A disaster declaration would have made larger amounts of federal funding available more quickly to help Flint residents whose drinking water is contaminated with lead. But under federal law, only natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods are eligible for disaster declarations, federal and state officials said. The lead contamination of Flint's drinking water is a manmade catastrophe." CW: Yes, yes, it is. ...

... Kristen East of Politico: "Sen. Bernie Sanders on Saturday called on Rick Snyder to resign, charging that the Republican Michigan governor knowingly allowed a lead-poisoning crisis in Flint to continue. 'There are no excuses,' Sanders said in a campaign release. 'The governor long ago knew about the lead in Flint's water. He did nothing. As a result, hundreds of children were poisoned. Thousands may have been exposed potential brain damage from lead.'"

Presidential Race

Annie Karni of Politico: "A top surrogate for Hillary Clinton is prepping a new attack in an intensifying and increasingly personal war against rival Bernie Sanders -- calling on the 74-year-old to release his medical records before the Iowa caucuses on Feb. 1. Clinton defender David Brock -- founder of the Correct the Record PAC, which coordinates directly with Clinton's campaign -- is expected to hit the airwaves this weekend from Charleston, the scene of the third Democratic debate on Sunday night, and challenge Sanders to cough up a clean bill of health and doctor's note in the next 16 days, according to a Democrat familiar with his thinking.... But hours later, after this report was published and Brock's planned tactics were widely criticized on Twitter, campaign chairman John Podesta distanced himself from the surrogate's attack."

Patrick Healy of the New York Times: "Advisers to Hillary Clinton, including former President Bill Clinton, believe that her campaign made serious miscalculations by forgoing early attacks on Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and failing to undercut his archliberal message before it grew into a political movement that has now put him within striking distance of beating Mrs. Clinton in Iowa and New Hampshire.... The Clintons are particularly concerned that her 'rational message,' in the words of an aide, is not a fit with a restless Democratic primary electorate. Allies and advisers of the Clintons say Mr. Sanders is clearly connecting with voters through his emotional, inspiring rallying cry that the American economic and political systems are rigged for the wealthy and powerful. By contrast, Mrs. Clinton has been stressing her electability and questioning the costs of Mr. Sanders's ideas." ...

... AND, if that's not enough, count on Maureen Dowd to think of everything else Hillary is doing wrong. Because that's what Dowd does.

... Alan Rappeport of the New York Times: Donald Trump's "increasingly personal lines of attack against Mr. Cruz in a public setting mark a shift in the race for the Republican presidential nomination that started during Thursday's debate and spilled onto the campaign trail on Saturday." ...

... David Atkins in the Washington Monthly: "... the Trump/Cruz ascendancy on the right is nonetheless a good thing for American politics. There are two principal reasons why: 1) It disempowers the conservative economic and media tycoons who created the malaise that fuels the anger of the GOP base.... 2) The Trump-Cruz electorate is shrinking, but the power of concentrated wealth is growing."

Donald at the Plaza. David Segal of the New York Times: "How [Donald] Trump came to own, operate and then lose the Plaza [Hotel] reveals a lot about his business style. For decades, Mr. Trump has boasted of his boardroom skills in self-exalting speeches and books. As the front-runner in the Republican presidential race, he frequently argues that his corner-office prowess uniquely suits him to negotiate with world leaders. What does this prowess look like up close? In the Plaza tale, Mr. Trump demonstrated both strengths (an ability to charm or strong-arm, as the occasion required) and weaknesses (a kind of hungry impatience that left him searching for new trophies as soon as one had been acquired). His methods as a political candidate mirror his methods as an executive, say those who have dealt with the latter and seen the former. In fact, the more you know about Mr. Trump's past, the more his run for high office looks like an effort to close the biggest deal of his life." ...

... Katie Glueck of Politico: "Hours before Ted Cruz and Donald Trump were slated to appear [in Myrtle Beach, S.C.,] at a tea party gathering, Cruz unloaded on Trump, taunting him over his poll numbers and ratcheting up attacks on his conservative credibility."

Beyond the Beltway

** Dan Kaufman in a New York Times op-ed: "SHORTLY after his exit from an abbreviated presidential run last fall, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin returned to a more successful undertaking: dismantling what remains of his state's century-old progressive legacy." Kaufman catalogues the horribles to remind us of this true American tragedy, a rolling crime against humanity.

Way Beyond

Tacos! Azam Ahmed of the New York Times: How the federales captured El Chapo.

New York Times: "Qaeda militants killed one American in an attack on two hotels and a cafe in the capital of Burkina Faso that left at least 28 people dead and 56 injured on Friday and Saturday, the State Department said on Saturday night. A State Department spokesman, John Kirby, identified the victim as Michael James Riddering."

"Greasers"

Yesterday in the Commentariat I mentioned that I disliked the use of words like "oily" & "oleaginous" applied to Marco Rubio, as I felt (and feel) they invoke the term "greaser," a derogatory term whites called Latino men in the 1950s & '60s. Several readers objected to my objection.

As I learned from Wikipedia, use of the term greaser has a long history:

Greaser was a derogatory term for a Mexican in what is now the U.S. Southwest in the 19th century. The slur likely derived from what was considered one of the lowliest occupations typically held by Mexicans, the greasing of the axles of wagons; they also greased animal hides that were taken to California where Mexicans loaded them onto clipper ships (a greaser). It was in common usage among U.S. troops during the Mexican-American War.

By the time I heard the word greaser, in the late 1950s, my Anglo schoolmates were using it to disparage Latinos -- almost all Cubans -- and Italians. As far as I knew, it referred to their D.A. hairstyles, which they held in place with a lot of pomade. I think that was an assumption on my part, & I've read elsewhere that it also referred to their diets of greasy food. It also may relate to Hispanics' love of cars -- low-riders -- which back in the day ran on a lot of grease.

At the same time, Anglo boys adopted the greaser look: the D.A. hairstyle, T-shirts with rolled-up sleeves (a pack of Lucky Strikes fit nicely in the cuffs), waist-length leather jackets (tho not so much in the Miami, Florida, where I lived). You might remember Elvis. And James Dean. As far as I can recall, Anglos who adopted the style in my schools did not refer to themselves as greasers, & neither did anyone else. Greasers were Hispanic or Italian, and they were the rough boys or those perceived to be toughs. The president of my high school class was of Italian heritage & wore his hair in a D.A. & the cuffs of his (short-sleeved sports) shirts rolled up, but no one referred to him as a greaser.

As it passed into history, the greaser culture became an object of nostalgic recollection. Ergo, the supposedly-Italian tough but lovable Fonzie in the 1970's teevee show "Happy Days," which was set in the 1950s. And of course the play & film "Grease" (set in 1959; first performed in 1971) is all about greasers: a gang of boys from working-class families, not all of whom are Latino or Italian. A gang of greasers -- the Pharaohs -- were important in George Lucas's classic remembrance of his boyhood past, "American Graffiti."

Latinos & Italians are more apt than other ethnic groups to have oily skin. This is likey why Donald Trump has repeatedly mentioned Marco Rubio's "sweating a lot." There is something wrong with Marco's skin, see. It seeps something. It's not like white skin (even tho Marco looks white to me).

Richard Dreyfuss, playing an actor playing a Latin American dictator in "Moon Over Parador."So when Charles Pierce refers in one post to Marco Rubio as being "oily" and to Ted Cruz -- who is half-Hispanic, albeit from Spain -- as "oleaginous," I cringe. In addition, in the same piece, Pierce writes, "young Marco Rubio ... is just dying to put on a hat with some braid and stand on a balcony." Who does that? Um, Latin American dictators, at least in the movies.

Yes, Ted is oleaginous, & Marco is slick. But when a white American writer gets the adjective thesaurus out of his head, he should be careful that the adjectives he chooses don''t convey or invoke an ethnic stereotype. I don't know what was in Pierce's head when he described Rubio as "oily enough to fry chicken in."  I don't know what he was thinking when he likened Marco to a stereotype of a South American dictator. He may have done so purposely; he may be unaware of his prejudice. But I do think it betrays a prejudice, or at least an unfortunate carelessness.

If I did it myself, I'd apologize.

Both Marco & Ted merit plenty of criticism; it's easy to slam them without alluding to their cultural heritage and assumed ethnicity.