The Conversation -- May 15, 2024
Abbie VanSickle of the New York Times: "The Supreme Court on Wednesday temporarily revived a congressional map in Louisiana that includes a second majority-Black district, halting a lower court decision to pause the map over concerns that it was racially gerrymandered. The move could increase Democrats' likelihood of taking control of a second congressional seat in Louisiana. The newly drawn map had been approved in January by Louisiana's Republican-controlled legislature after it had been directed to redraw it. The decision, which was unsigned, said that it would remain in effect pending an appeal or a decision by the Supreme Court. The court's three liberal justices wrote that they would not have lifted the block on the proposed map, with Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan noting they would have denied the stay application."
Marie: Way back Wednesday morning Judd Legum was reminding us that Justice Juan "Merchan's order prohibits Trump from "directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses." (Okay, I never forgot.) As Legum noted, "Many of Trump's surrogates appear to be speaking from a common script," so it was pretty obvious that somebody was coordinating and directing the Trumpiclones' remarks. Besides, does anybody think that Senator Potato Head could be counted on to say the right thing under his own volition? Of course not. In fact, when asked by a Newsmax host if he was speaking "to go against the gag order and intimidate witnesses because Trump can't," Tuberville answered, "Yes, sir." ~~~
~~~ So Now. Charlie Nash of Mediaite: "New York Magazine contributing editor Andrew Rice claimed on Tuesday that he spotted ... Donald Trump 'editing' and 'making notations' to the speeches his allies then made outside of the courtroom during his hush money trial in New York.... 'Before or after?' asked MSNBC host Chris Hayes, to which Rice replied, '... While Michael Cohen was testifying against him, he was actually ... going through and annotating and editing the quotes that these people were going to say.'" On MSNBC Wednesday afternoon, Andrew Weissmann said Justice Merchan was unlikely to raise the issue on his own, so it would be up to the prosecutors if they wanted to call to the judge's attention the apparent violation of the gag order. ~~~
~~~ AND the headline of this firewalled Rolling Stone story is "Trump's GOP 'Surrogates' Take Turns Bashing Judge's Daughter." Maybe that will get Justice Merchan's attention.
MEANWHILE, Down the Street. Aaron Katersky of the AP: "Sen. Robert Menendez 'put his power up for sale' and 'betrayed the people he was supposed to serve,' a prosecutor claimed Wednesday at the start of the New Jersey Democrat's federal bribery trial in New York.... 'He was powerful. He was also corrupt,' prosecutor Lara Pomerantz said of the senator during her opening statement.... His price, Pomerantz told the jury, was gold bars, envelopes stuffed with cash, checks to his wife for a no-show job and a Mercedes-Benz convertible.... The defense meanwhile introduced Menendez 'not as an agent of the Egyptian government' but as 'an American patriot' who 'took no bribes.' Menendez has pleaded not guilty to 16 federal charges including bribery, fraud, acting as a foreign agent and obstruction."
~~~~~~~~~~
Presidential Race. Jonathan Swan & Maggie Haberman of the New York Times: "President Biden is willing to debate ... Donald J. Trump at least twice before the election, and as early as June -- but his campaign is rejecting the nonpartisan organization that has managed presidential debates since 1988, according to a letter obtained by The New York Times. The letter by the Biden campaign lays out for the first time the president's terms for giving Mr. Trump what he has openly clamored for: a televised confrontation with a successor Mr. Trump has portrayed, and hopes to reveal, as too feeble to hold the job. Mr. Biden and his top aides want the debates to start much sooner than the dates proposed by the Commission on Presidential Debates, so voters can see the two candidates side by side well before early voting begins in September. They want the debate to occur inside a TV studio, with microphones that automatically cut off when a speaker's time limit elapses. And they want it to be just the two candidates and the moderator -- without the raucous in-person audiences that Mr. Trump feeds on and without the participation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or other independent or third-party candidates." ~~~
~~~ Josh Boak, et al., of the AP: "Trump responded to the letter in an interview with Fox News digital, calling the proposed dates 'fully acceptable to me.'... Biden, in a post on X..., sought to needle his rival, saying, 'Donald Trump lost two debates to me in 2020, since then, he hasn't shown up for a debate. Now he's acting like he wants to debate me again. Well, make my day, pal.'... [Biden] suggested that the two candidates could pick some dates, taking a dig at Trump's ongoing New York hush money trial by noting that the Republican is 'free on Wednesdays,' the usual day off in the trial." ~~~
~~~ ** UPDATE. Betsy Klein, et al., of CNN: “President Joe Biden and ... Donald Trump have both accepted an invitation from CNN to debate on June 27, a historically early showdown that will set the tone for the final months of the 2024 campaign. 'I've received and accepted an invitation from @CNN for a debate on June 27th. Over to you, Donald. As you said: anywhere, any time, any place,' Biden said in a post on X. A Trump campaign official later told CNN that Trump had accepted the offer."
Trump Mob Trial
Ben Protess, et al., of the New York Times: Michael Cohen's "testimony [yesterday] marked a pivotal moment for prosecutors [of the criminal trial of Donald Trump]. They charged Mr. Trump with falsifying the checks and other records, and Mr. Cohen's recounting drove those accusations home. It offered the jury its first and only personal account tying the former president to the documents at the crux of his case. Mr. Trump has denied the allegations and the sex, and his legal team soon sought to sweep Mr. Cohen's revelations aside in cross-examination. The lead defense lawyer, Todd Blanche, attacked Mr. Cohen's credibility, portraying him as out of control and bent on exacting revenge on Mr. Trump after his patron abandoned him. Mr. Blanche also emphasized Mr. Cohen's voluminous television appearances and insult-slinging on social media -- all of which Mr. Cohen did in defiance of the prosecution's wishes and at Mr. Trump's expense, Mr. Blanche suggested. And he noted that Mr. Cohen maintains a financial interest in attacking Mr. Trump, arguing that he cashed in on their feud with a podcast and a pair of books." ~~~
~~~ Marie: Times reporters in yesterday's liveblog (linked below) and in the article here have emphasized that Cohen's oral testimony is the only proof the prosecution has offered to tie Trump to the crime. But that isn't accurate, IMO. First, there's Exhibit 35, the account statement from the phony LLC Cohen established to pay off Stormy Daniels. Trump's former controller Jeff McConney authenticated Allen Weisselberg's handwritten note on the statement which show that the Trump Org would "gross up" the $130,000 payment Cohen made from his own funds to $420,000 to cover related expenses, including Cohen's anticipated tax liability. In addition, prosecutors put into evidence 12 checks, written in 2017, each in the amount of $35,000, to be paid for "legal services" rendered by Michael Cohen in a year in which Cohen provided no legal services to Trump or the Trump Org. Trump signed 10 of those checks.
Several of Trump's still-loyal former employees testified that Donald Trump (a) paid close attention to detail of moneys paid out; and (b) was so cheap (cruel & dishonest, IMO) that he ordered staff to negotiate down legitimate payments due. It should be obvious to every juror that even a more careless person would notice that he was paying more than double the $130K -- and for services never performed. Conspiracies are seldom written down, but here there is both documentation and oral testimony from multiple defendant-friendly sources proving up Trump's knowledge of the scheme. Also, Blanche's argument, emphasized in the Times story, that Cohen hates Trump, falls flat. In conspiracy cases, the evidence usually comes, at least in part, from parties who have had fallings-out with the defendant and have "flipped" in their own self-interest. Co-conspirators in illegal enterprises are not upstanding folks with pure motives. They're criminals like Michael Cohen.
Here are takeaways by CNN reporters on Todd Blanche's cross-examination of Michael Cohen and other stuff. Though the CNN reporters discuss Blanche's opening shots, oddly enough, they don't mention Justice Merchan's response. According to Jonah Bromwich of the New York Times: "Soon afterward, there was a sidebar, out of earshot of jurors. At that sidebar, according to a transcript..., Justice Merchan asked Blanche: 'Why are you making this about yourself?'... Blanche protested, but the judge stood firm. 'Just don't make it about yourself,' he said to conclude the conference." ~~~
~~~ Stephen Collinson of CNN did catch Merchan's scolding of Todd Blanche: "... Blanche mostly concentrated on his effort to tarnish Cohen's character, motives and credibility rather than the core question of the case -- whether Trump falsified the business records as part of a cover up expressly designed to mislead voters in 2016 in an early instance of election interference.... But jurors don't have to like Cohen. They just have to believe him.... As always, when a Trump subordinate performs in front of the boss, there was a sense Blanche's histrionics were as much for the benefit of his client as the case. And in a curious debut of the cross-examination, Blanche earned an admonition from Judge Juan Merchan for making it all about him, when he noted Cohen had called him a 'crying little sh*t' on TikTok."
Hannah Knowles & Marianne LeVine of the Washington Post: "Sen. J.D. Vance, who once recoiled from Donald Trump's lewd comments about women, was at Trump's side in court this week as prosecutors rehashed the infamous 'Access Hollywood' tape that upended his 2016 campaign. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), an amiable advocate of conservative Christian morals, came to the courthouse the next day to call Trump's trial a 'shame,' a 'travesty' and a 'partisan witch hunt.'... An hour later, one of Trump's former presidential rivals [-- Vivek Ramaswamy --] stood in a nearby park attacking the witnesses the former president is legally barred from disparaging himself.... The pilgrimages demonstrate the imperative in today's GOP to show loyalty to Trump and his fervent base in the midst of a case that has become a showcase of salacious scandal. Notably absent from court: Trump's wife...." ~~~
~~~ Marie: The past couples of days' shows of force (see photo of yesterday's courthouse entourage accompanying WashPo article) have reminded me less of obsequious toadies -- which of course they are -- than of the made men who sit shoulder-to-shoulder at the back of courtrooms during mob criminal trials, primarily for the purpose of intimidating witnesses, which is what Trump's toadies also are doing. There's this observation from the Times' liveblog yesterday, by Jonah Bromwich:
Michael Cohen was in the midst of testimony about weighing whether to retain loyalty to Trump, painting it as a very difficult decision, as he considered whether he would be loyal to his family, his country or Trump. As he was speaking, Vivek Ramaswamy and a number of the other politicians here supporting Trump today walked back in the room. It was a remarkable moment, but Cohen seemed mostly unfazed. He kept testifying. ~~~
~~~ Another Ignominious Moment in American History. Meg Kinnard of the AP: "U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson assailed the hush money case against Donald Trump Tuesday as an illegitimate 'sham,' becoming the highest-ranking Republican to show up at court, embrace the former president's claims of political persecution and attack the U.S. system of justice. It was a remarkable moment in modern American politics: The House speaker amplifying Trump's defense and turning the Republican Party against the federal and state legal systems that are foundational to the U.S. government and a cornerstone of democracy.... Johnson was a chief architect of Trump's efforts to challenge the 2020 presidential results ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, mob assault on the U.S. Capitol.... Unlike other Republicans showing up to show their support, Johnson did not enter the courtroom where Trump is on trial, but dashed back to Washington to open the House chamber for the day."
Yesterday was another Trump day in a downtown Manhattan courtroom, and New York Times reporters were there to keep us up to speed. See details in yesterday's Conversation.
STFU, Donald. Alan Feuer of the New York Times: "A New York State appeals court on Tuesday upheld a gag order imposed on ... Donald J. Trump in his criminal trial in Manhattan, rejecting arguments that the measure had violated Mr. Trump's First Amendment rights.... In its decision Tuesday, a five-judge panel of the appeals court wrote that Justice [Juan] Merchan had 'properly determined' that Mr. Trump's 'public statements posed a significant threat to the integrity of the testimony of witnesses and potential witnesses in this case.' The decision also found that Justice Merchan had properly weighed Mr. Trump's free speech rights against the court's 'commitment to ensuring the fair administration of justice in criminal cases' and the rights of people connected to the case 'from being free from threats, intimidation, harassment and harm.'" ~~~
~~~ Marie: As we've seen, Trump has sidestepped the gag order by getting his henchmen to stand on the courthouse steps and make the same attacks he is prevented by court order from delivering. The judge has no control over these remarks by others, particular when the others are elected officials. ~~~
~~~ digby: "Trump has brought his surrogates to the trial to violate his gag order for him." Includes a number of examples. ~~~
~~~ BUT. Judd Legum of Popular Information: Justice Juan "Merchan's order prohibits Trump from 'directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses.' The order also prohibits Trump from directing others to attack the jury, the court staff, or family members. Asked on Tuesday if he directed the Republicans to speak about the trial on his behalf, Trump described them as his '"surrogates' and praised them for 'speaking very beautifully.' Trump has also entered the courthouse flanked by his surrogates, effectively giving them his imprimatur. Many of Trump's surrogates appear to be speaking from a common script.... If Trump directed his surrogates to speak, their comments could constitute criminal contempt of the gag order by Trump.... Attorney Jeff Jacobovitz, in an appearance on MSNBC..., noted that 'if Trump is feeding information' to his allies, it would violate the gag order."
How Trump Normalizes Violence. Peter Eisler, et al., of Reuters: "When Donald Trump attacks the integrity of judges hearing cases against him, his followers often respond with posts urging that the jurists be beaten, tortured and killed.... Trump has baselessly cast the judges and prosecutors in his trials as corrupt puppets of the Biden administration.... [For instance, on April 23, ] Trump declared on Truth Social, [that Justice Juan Merchan] is a 'highly conflicted' overseer of a 'kangaroo court.' Trump supporters swiftly replied to his post with a blitz of attacks on Merchan.... Some called for Merchan and other judges hearing cases against Trump to be killed.... In a review of commenters' posts on three pro-Trump websites..., Reuters documented more than 150 posts since March 1 that called for physical violence against the judges handling three of his highest-profile cases.... Those posts were part of a larger pool of hundreds identified by Reuters that used hostile, menacing and, in some cases, racist or sexualized language to attack the judges.... Experts on extremism say the constant repetition of threatening or menacing language can normalize the idea of violence -- and increase the risk of someone carrying it out." ~~~
~~~ Marie: Trump's lackeys of course are doing the same: encouraging violence by playing down actual acts of violence like the January 6 attack on the U.S. capitol and by falsely claiming that law enforcement agencies and President Biden are persecuting poor old Trump and taking away winger "freedoms."
Primary Elections
Jonathan Weisman of the New York Times: "Hundreds of thousands of voters in Maryland, West Virginia and Nebraska went to the polls on Tuesday, weighing in on primaries whose results pointed to a desire for moderation, achievement and diversity, and a rejection of the political power of money....
Maryland. "Representative David Trone, a co-owner of the giant alcohol retailer Total Wine and More, gave up his safe House seat, spent more than $60 million of his fortune and lost the Senate Democratic primary to Angela Alsobrooks, who hopes to become only the third Black woman to be elected to Congress's upper chamber.... Maryland would ordinarily have been a safe bet for Democrats hoping to hold the seat of Senator Ben Cardin upon his retirement, but the entry of Larry Hogan, a popular former governor and Republican moderate [who won the primary by a landslide], into the race has scrambled the equation.... [Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn] was beaten by a soft-spoken workhorse, State Senator Sarah Elfreth, in a Democratic primary almost certain to determine who will represent Maryland's Third House District....
Nebraska. "In Nebraskas swing district around Omaha, Representative Don Bacon, who has a reputation as an independent voice, faced off against Dan Frei, a conservative challenger backed by the state's Republican Party, a pro-Trump bastion.... On Tuesday, Mr. Bacon trounced Mr. Frei, setting up a much tougher race for the Democratic nominee, State Senator Tony Vargas....
West Virginia. "Derrick Evans, an unrepentant rioter arrested after participating in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, challenged Representative Carol Miller in a safe Republican seat. Ms. Miller is no moderate, but she isn't a rioter. The incumbent whipped the insurgent." ~~~
Also from the Times story: In the Maryland Democratic presidential primary, about 10 percent voted for uncommitted & another 3.3 percent chose Marianne Williamson or Dean Phillips. Phillips got 8 percent of the vote in Nebraska. In West Virginia some 20% of Democratic voters chose candidates named Jason Palmer and Stephen Lyons. On the Republican side, zombie candidate Nikki Haley got about 20 percent in both Maryland and Nebraska and about 10 percent in West Virginia.
West Virginia Senate Race. Amy Wang of the Washington Post: "West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice (R) is projected to win the Republican primary for Senate in the state, according to the Associated Press. Justice defeated a crowded field of contenders to clinch the GOP nomination and is also heavily favored to win the general election in the deep-red state."
Benjamin Mullin of the New York Times: "The Department of Justice said on Tuesday that Boeing was in violation of a 2021 settlement related to problems with the company's 737 Max model that led to two deadly plane crashes in 2018 and 2019. In a letter to a federal judge, the department said that Boeing had failed to 'design, implement and enforce' an ethics program to prevent and detect violations of U.S. fraud laws in the company's operations.... The determination by the Justice Department opens the door to a potential prosecution of a 2021 criminal charge accusing Boeing of conspiracy to defraud the Federal Aviation Administration, though Boeing can contest Tuesday's decision. In a statement, Boeing said that the company believed that it had honored the terms of the settlement, adding that it was looking forward to the opportunity to respond." The CBS News report is here.
~~~~~~~~~~
Israel/Palestine, et al.
Louisa Loveluck of the Washington Post: "Israeli tanks moved deeper into Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on Tuesday, pushing closer to the dense urban centers President Biden has warned Israel against invading, and prompting one of the larges civilian exoduses of the seven-month war." (Also linked yesterday.)
Robert Jimison of the New York Times: "The Biden administration has told Congress that it intends to move forward with a plan for the United States to sell more than $1 billion in new weapons to Israel, according to three congressional aides familiar with the deal. The notification of the sale, which would include new tactical vehicles and ammunition, comes as President Biden has withheld a shipment of bombs to Israel, hoping to prevent U.S.-made weapons from being used in a potential invasion of the southern Gaza city of Rafah. Last week, Mr. Biden said he would block the delivery of weapons such as bombs and missiles that could be fired into the densely populated area where more than a million Palestinians are sheltering. The potential arms transfer illustrated the narrow path the Biden administration is walking with Israel, trying to prevent an assault on Rafah and limit civilian casualties in Gaza but continuing to supply a longtime ally that the president has said has a right to defend itself. One congressional aide said Congress had been aware of the arms deal for months...." A CBS News report is here.
Ukraine, et al.
Michael Birnbaum of the Washington Post: "Before [Antony] Blinken became the top American diplomat, he was a serious rock guitarist -- and along with a Ukrainian band, he played 'Rockin' in the Free World,' a 1989 song by [Neil Young], the Canadian American musician, for a packed basement music club [in Kiev, Ukraine].... 'The United States is with you. So much of the world is with you. And they're fighting, not just for a free Ukraine, but for the free world. And the free world is with you too,' Blinken said before launching into the song with 19.99, a Kyiv punk band." ~~~
Anatoly Kurmanaev of the New York Times: "Russian security agents detained a senior general early Tuesday, widening a purge of the country's sprawling Defense Ministry amid President Vladimir V. Putin's broader shake-up of his government. Lt. Gen. Yuri Kuznetsov, who oversaw the ministry's personnel department, was detained on an accusation of 'large-scale' bribery, Russia's Investigative Committee, a federal law enforcement agency, said in a statement on Tuesday." (Also linked yesterday.)