The Commentariat -- December 29, 2019
Jan Wolfe of Reuters: "... Joe Biden on Saturday said there would be 'no legal basis' for Republicans to subpoena his testimony in ... Donald Trump's impeachment trial, clarifying remarks from Friday that drew criticism. 'I want to clarify something I said yesterday. In my 40 years in public life, I have always complied with a lawful order and in my eight years as VP, my office -- unlike Donald Trump and Mike Pence -- cooperated with legitimate congressional oversight requests,' Biden said on Twitter. 'But I am just not going to pretend that there is any legal basis for Republican subpoenas for my testimony in the impeachment trial,' Biden added. The statement came one day after Biden said in an interview with the Des Moines Register that he would not comply with a Senate subpoena because it would be a tactic by Trump to distract from the president's wrongdoing. Some legal experts and commentators had criticized Biden for his remarks to the Iowa newspaper, noting that the White House's refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas was part of the reason why Trump had been impeached." ~~~
~~~ Mrs. Bea McCrabbie: Just to clarify, Biden is not "clarifying" his earlier remarks. "Clarifying" is elaborating on or rephrasing a statement that was confusing or could be misunderstood. Biden's original remark was pretty damned comprehensible: one of the interviewers asked, "Do you stand by your original statement that you wouldn't comply if you were subpoenaed to testify in an impeachment trial before the Senate?" Biden answered "Correct," then went on to say why he would not comply. (See video on the linked page.) He's taking that back, not clarifying the meaning of "correct." ~~~
~~~ Update. Thomas Kaplan of the New York Times gets it right: "Joseph R. Biden Jr. backtracked on Saturday from his stated position that he would not comply with a subpoena to testify in President Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate. Instead, he declared that he would abide by 'any subpoena that was sent to me' even as he insisted there was no justification for calling him as a witness. A day after reaffirming that he would not comply with a subpoena, Mr. Biden tried twice on Saturday to clarify his remarks, asserting that there would be no 'legal basis' for such a subpoena but left it unclear, for much of the day, if he would ultimately comply with one. Then, questioned by a voter about the issue of compliance with subpoenas, Mr. Biden answered unequivocally. 'I would obey any subpoena that was sent to me,' he said at a town hall-style event in Fairfield[, Iowa]. Mr. Biden's 180-degree turn on whether he would comply with a subpoena was one of the starkest and swiftest reversals by a candidate in the Democratic primary campaign, and came after he faced questions and criticism about whether his initial stand would run counter to the rule of law." ~~~
~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: This mini-brouhaha demonstrates anew Biden's remarkable inability to field the inevitable questions about Ukraine. Of course, he would still be a far better president* than Trump, who blatantly lies about his "perfect" phone call, whines about persecution, & personally attacks those who call him out for abusing his office.
David Frum of the Atlantic: "... in the early hours of Friday morning, December 27, Trump retweeted a supporter who named the presumed whistleblower in the text of the tweet. This is a step the president has been building toward for some time.... Lawyers debate whether the naming of the federal whistleblower is in itself illegal. Federal law forbids inspectors general to disclose the names of whistleblowers, but the law isn't explicit about disclosure by anybody else in government. What the law does forbid is retaliation against a whistleblower. And a coordinated campaign of vilification by the president's allies -- and the president himself -- surely amounts to' retaliation' by any reasonable understanding.... Trump is organizing from the White House a conspiracy to revenge himself on the person who first alerted the country that Trump was extorting Ukraine to help his re-election: more lawbreaking to punish the revelation of past law-breaking.... He is a president with the mind of a gangster, and as long as he is in office, he will head a gangster White House." (Also linked yesterday afternoon.) ~~~
~~~ Update. Colby Itkowitz of the Washington Post: "By Saturday morning, Trump's retweet had been deleted.... Federal laws offer only limited protection for those in the intelligence community who report wrongdoing, and those in the intelligence community have even fewer protections than their counterparts in other agencies. The 1998 Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act did not detail any protections for whistleblowers from retaliation -- instead merely describing the process to make a complaint.... In the days after Christmas, Trump retweeted more than a dozen posts from users affiliated with QAnon, the conspiracy theory that there is a 'deep state' secretly plotting to take down Trump. The FBI has identified QAnon as a potential domestic terrorism threat." ~~~
~~~ Brian Stelter of CNN: "Other [Trump] retweets were also reversed, including pro-Trump and anti-Democrat memes from suspicious-looking Twitter accounts. But his whistleblower-related post was the most noteworthy because nearly every public official involved in the impeachment inquiry agreed that the identity of the original complainant should be protected.... Some of the accounts [Trump retweeted] show signs of being run by spam operations, but others appear to be genuine, passionate Trump supporters....Ultimately, what the President's tweetstorm reveals -- in unflattering detail -- is his sketchy sources of information. Twitter spokesman Nick Pacilio confirmed to CNN Saturday afternoon that the platform has suspended some of the pro-Trump accounts that Trump had promoted Friday night....He also retweeted people calling Democrats 'rats' and videos claiming to prove 'collusion between DNC & Ukraine during 2016 Presidential campaign.' There has been no evidence of collusion between the Democratic National Committee and Ukraine in the last election. Vox's Aaron Rupar ... wrote on Twitter Friday night, 'The President of the United States has, today alone, retweeted 2 QAnon fan accounts, a Pizzagate account, an account that compared his following to a cult, and an account that described [President] Obama as "Satan's Muslim Scum."'" ~~~
~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: As a reminder to the understandably benumbed: a real president would not retweet any of this crapola.
Greg Robb of MarketWatch: "... Donald Trump's strategy to use import tariffs to protect and boost U.S. manufacturers backfired and led to job losses and higher prices, according to a Federal Reserve study released this week.... While the tariffs did reduce competition for some industries in the domestic U.S. market, this was more than offset by the effects of rising input costs and retaliatory tariffs, the study found." (Also linked yesterday afternoon.)
Deborah Pearlstein in the Atlantic: "In his efforts to mask the seriousness of his actions around Russia and Ukraine..., Donald Trump has taken aim at one essential democratic institution after another -- questioning the legitimacy of the press, the intelligence community, the courts, and, most recently, the House of Representatives itself. But he has so far mostly held his fire against both 'his generals' and 'our boys' in America's military.... The military's generally steadying reactions to the president's worst moments of volatility have given members of Congress on both sides of the aisle reason to hope that the Pentagon at least will remain a check on presidential impulse that might really compromise national security, should other checking institutions fail. But hoping that a president will defer to the judgment of the professional military is a sign that something has gone very wrong in America's constitutional infrastructure." Read on. (Also linked yesterday afternoon.)
Vanity Cameo. About That "Home Alone 2" Trump Cameo that the CBC Cut. Theresa Braine of the New York Daily News: In the clip, "Trump directs [Macauley] Culkin's character to a pay phone in the Plaza Hotel, which the not-yet-president owned at the time.... In truth, the scene was never meant to be part of [the film]. Trump routinely mandates that in return for filming at one of his properties, he has to be in a scene, according to many in the movie industry. 'The deal was that if you wanted to shoot in one of his buildings, you had to write him in a part,' Matt Damon told The Hollywood Reporter in 2017. '[Director] Martin Brest had to write something in "Scent of a Woman" -- and the whole crew was in on it. You have to waste an hour of your day with a bulls--t shot: Donald Trump walks in and Al Pacino's like, "Hello, Mr. Trump!" -- you had to call him by name -- and then he exits. You waste a little time so that you can get the permit, and then you can cut the scene out. But I guess in "Home Alone 2" they left it in.'" (Also linked yesterday.)
** Science v. Sharpie. Facts Are Their Enemies. Brad Plumer & Coral Davenport of the New York Times: "In just three years, the Trump administration has diminished the role of science in federal policymaking while halting or disrupting research projects nationwide, marking a transformation of the federal government whose effects, experts say, could reverberate for years. Political appointees have shut down government studies, reduced the influence of scientists over regulatory decisions and in some cases pressured researchers not to speak publicly. The administration has particularly challenged scientific findings related to the environment and public health opposed by industries such as oil drilling and coal mining. It has also impeded research around human-caused climate change, which President Trump has dismissed despite a global scientific consensus."
Senate Race 2020. Bruce Schreiner of the AP: "Calling her party's victory in the Kentucky governor's race a jolt of momentum for her own bid to unseat a Republican incumbent, Democrat Amy McGrath on Friday officially filed to challenge Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in what looms as a bruising, big-spending campaign next year.McGrath, a retired Marine combat pilot, touted many of the same issues -- health care and good-paying jobs -- that Andy Beshear highlighted in ousting Republican incumbent Matt Bevin in last month's election for governor.... McGrath became the latest in a crowded field of candidates from both parties to file for McConnell's seat. McGrath, who lost a hotly contested congressional race last year, has shown her mettle as a fundraiser, raking in nearly $11 million in her first few months as a Senate candidate, giving her a huge advantage over other Democratic candidates. McConnell has his own bulging campaign fund." (Also linked yesterday.)
Lisa Pane of the AP: "A database compiled by The Associated Press, USA Today and Northeastern University shows that there were more mass killings in 2019 than any year dating back to at least the 1970s, punctuated by a chilling succession of deadly rampages during the summer. In all, there were 41 mass killings, defined as when four or more people are killed excluding the perpetrator. Of those, 33 were mass shootings. More than 210 people were killed."
AFP (Dec. 27): "The United Nations on Friday approved a Russian-led bid that aims to create a new convention on cybercrime, alarming rights groups and Western powers that fear a bid to restrict online freedom. The General Assembly approved the resolution sponsored by Russia and backed by China, which would set up a committee of international experts in 2020.... The United States, European powers and rights groups fear that the language is code for legitimizing crackdowns on expression, with numerous countries defining criticism of the government as 'criminal.'... Human Rights Watch called the UN resolution's list of sponsors 'a rogue's gallery of some of the earth's most repressive governments.'"
Danielle Paquette of the Washington Post: "What started as an anniversary promotion called the Year of Return -- a government-funded call for the African diaspora to explore Ghana four centuries after the first slave ship reached Virginian soil -- has enticed some Americans to stay for good. Officials in this West African nation of roughly 29 million people say interest has overwhelmed the tourism office as the annual flood of visitors has more than doubled and A-list celebrities spark frenzies around the capital.... The rush to Ghana, where millions of Africans were forced into servitude before the slave trade ended in 1870, intensified after [derogatory] tweets from President Trump." ~~~
~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: I hope I'm wrong, but this does not sound like a story with a happy ending. Paquette cites two visitors: one, an American used-car salesman who has moved to Ghana to "explore business opportunities," and two, a rapper who stayed in a $12,000-a-night hotel in a country where the average annual income is just over $2,000. Sounds less like a development program than an exploitation program.
News Lede
New York Times: "An intruder with a large knife burst into the home of a Hasidic rabbi in a New York suburb [Rockland County] on Saturday, stabbing and wounding five people just as they were gathering to light candles for Hanukkah, officials and a witness said.... Police officials announced around midnight that a suspect had been caught.... The attack came after a surge in anti-Semitic violence in the New York region. On Friday, the police in New York City stepped up patrols in three Brooklyn neighborhoods after what officials called an 'alarming' increase in incidents." A CBS New York story is here.