The Wires
powered by Surfing Waves
Help!

To keep the Conversation going, please help me by linking news articles, opinion pieces and other political content in today's Comments section.

Link Code:   <a href="URL">text</a>

OR here's a link generator. The one I had posted died, then Akhilleus found one, but it too bit the dust. He found yet another, which I've linked here, and as of September 23, 2024, it's working.

OR you can always just block, copy and paste to your comment the URL (Web address) of the page you want to link.

Note for Readers. It is not possible for commenters to "throw" their highlighted links to another window. But you can do that yourself. Right-click on the link and a drop-down box will give you choices as to where you want to open the link: in a new tab, new window or new private window.

Thank you to everyone who has been contributing links to articles & other content in the Comments section of each day's "Conversation." If you're missing the comments, you're missing some vital links.

Marie: Sorry, my countdown clock was unreliable; then it became completely unreliable. I can't keep up with it. Maybe I'll try another one later.

 

Public Service Announcement

Zoë Schlanger in the Atlantic: "Throw out your black plastic spatula. In a world of plastic consumer goods, avoiding the material entirely requires the fervor of a religious conversion. But getting rid of black plastic kitchen utensils is a low-stakes move, and worth it. Cooking with any plastic is a dubious enterprise, because heat encourages potentially harmful plastic compounds to migrate out of the polymers and potentially into the food. But, as Andrew Turner, a biochemist at the University of Plymouth recently told me, black plastic is particularly crucial to avoid." This is a gift link from laura h.

Mashable: "Following the 2024 presidential election results and [Elon] Musk's support for ... Donald Trump, users have been deactivating en masse. And this time, it appears most everyone has settled on one particular X alternative: Bluesky.... Bluesky has gained more than 100,000 new sign ups per day since the U.S. election on Nov. 5. It now has over 15 million users. It's enjoyed a prolonged stay on the very top of Apple's App Store charts as well. Ready to join? Here's how to get started on Bluesky[.]"

Washington Post: "Americans can again order free rapid coronavirus tests by mail, the Biden administration announced Thursday. People can request four free at-home tests per household through covidtests.gov. They will begin shipping Monday. The move comes ahead of an expected winter wave of coronavirus cases. The September revival of the free testing program is in line with the Biden administration’s strategy to respond to the coronavirus as part of a broader public health campaign to protect Americans from respiratory viruses, including influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), that surge every fall and winter. But free tests were not mailed during the summer wave, which wastewater surveillance data shows is now receding."

Wherein Michael McIntyre explains how Americans adapted English to their needs. With examples:

Beat the Buzzer. Some amazing young athletes:

     ~~~ Here's the WashPo story (March 23).

Back when the Washington Post had an owner/publisher who dared to stand up to a president:

Prime video is carrying the documentary. If you watch it, I suggest watching the Spielberg film "The Post" afterwards. There is currently a free copy (type "the post full movie" in the YouTube search box) on YouTube (or you can rent it on YouTube, on Prime & [I think] on Hulu). Near the end, Daniel Ellsberg (played by Matthew Rhys), says "I was struck in fact by the way President Johnson's reaction to these revelations was [that they were] 'close to treason,' because it reflected to me the sense that what was damaging to the reputation of a particular administration or a particular individual was in itself treason, which is very close to saying, 'I am the state.'" Sound familiar?

Out with the Black. In with the White. New York Times: “Lester Holt, the veteran NBC newscaster and anchor of the 'NBC Nightly News' over the last decade, announced on Monday that he will step down from the flagship evening newscast in the coming months. Mr. Holt told colleagues that he would remain at NBC, expanding his duties at 'Dateline,' where he serves as the show’s anchor.... He said that he would continue anchoring the evening news until 'the start of summer.' The network did not immediately name a successor.” ~~~

~~~ New York Times: “MSNBC said on Monday that Jen Psaki, the former White House press secretary who has become one of the most prominent hosts at the network, would anchor a nightly weekday show in prime time. Ms. Psaki, 46, will host a show at 9 p.m. Tuesday through Friday, replacing Alex Wagner, a longtime political journalist who has anchored that hour since 2022, according to a memo to staff from Rebecca Kutler, MSNBC’s president. Ms. Wagner will remain at MSNBC as an on-air correspondent. Rachel Maddow, MSNBC’s biggest star, has been anchoring the 9 p.m. hour on weeknights for the early days of ... [Donald] Trump’s administration but will return to hosting one night a week at the end of April.”

New York Times: “Joy Reid’s evening news show on MSNBC is being canceled, part of a far-reaching programming overhaul orchestrated by Rebecca Kutler, the network’s new president, two people familiar with the changes said. The final episode of Ms. Reid’s 7 p.m. show, 'The ReidOut,' is planned for sometime this week, according to the people, who were not authorized to speak publicly. The show, which features in-depth interviews with politicians and other newsmakers, has been a fixture of MSNBC’s lineup for the past five years. MSNBC is planning to replace Ms. Reid’s program with a show led by a trio of anchors: Symone Sanders Townsend, a political commentator and former Democratic strategist; Michael Steele, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee; and Alicia Menendez, the TV journalist, the people said. They currently co-host 'The Weekend,' which airs Saturday and Sunday mornings.” MB: In case you've never seen “The Weekend,” let me assure you it's pretty awful. ~~~

     ~~~ AP Update: "Joy Reid is leaving MSNBC, the network’s new president announced in a memo to staff on Monday, marking an end to the political analyst and anchor’s prime time news show."

Y! Entertainment: "Meanwhile, [Alex] Wagner will also be removed from her 9 pm weeknight slot. Wagner has already been working as a correspondent after Rachel Maddow took over hosting duties during ... Trump’s first 100 days in office. It’s now expected that Wagner will not return as host, but is expected to stay on as a contributor. Jen Psaki, President Biden’s former White House press secretary, is a likely replacement for Wagner, though a decision has not been finalized." MB: In fairness to Psaki, she is really too boring to watch. On the other hand, she is White. ~~~

     ~~~ RAS: "So MSNBC is getting rid of both of their minority evening hosts. Both women of color who are not afraid to call out the truth. Outspoken minorities don't have a long shelf life in the world of our corporate news media."

 

Contact Marie

Email Marie at constantweader@gmail.com

Constant Comments

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts. — Anonymous

A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolvesEdward R. Murrow

Publisher & Editor: Marie Burns

I have a Bluesky account now. The URL is https://bsky.app/profile/marie-burns.bsky.social . When Reality Chex goes down, check my Bluesky page for whatever info I am able to report on the status of Reality Chex. If you can't access the URL, I found that I could Google Bluesky and ask for Marie Burns. Google will include links to accounts for people whose names are, at least in part, Maria Burns, so you'll have to tell Google you looking only for Marie.

Wednesday
Apr092025

The Conversation -- April 10, 2025

Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Thursday instructed the government to take steps to return a Salvadoran migrant it had wrongly deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. In an unsigned order, the court stopped short of ordering the return of the migrant, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, indicating that courts may not have the power to require the executive branch to do so. But the court endorsed part of a trial judge’s order that had required the government to 'facilitate and effectuate the return' of Mr. Abrego Garcia. 'The order properly requires the government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador,' the Supreme Court’s ruling said. 'The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the district court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the district court’s authority.' The case will now return to the trial court, and it is not clear whether and when Mr. Abrego Garcia will be returned to the United States.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Bear in mind that any other court would be more definitive in their order. Rachel Maddow called reminiscent of "Kafka mixed with Bozo the Clown." And any other administration would forthwith call up El Savadoran President Bukele and tell him, "We're coming to get Mr. Abrego & take him back to his family." Expect the Trumpies to continue to pretend there's no way they can get Mr. Abrego out of jail.

Alexandra Berzon, et al., of the New York Times: “... the [Trump] administration is taking drastic steps to pressure some ... immigrants and others who had legal status to 'self-deport' by effectively canceling the Social Security numbers they had lawfully obtained, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times and interviews with six people familiar with the plans. The goal is to cut those people off from using crucial financial services like bank accounts and credit cards, along with their access to government benefits. The effort hinges on a surprising new tactic: repurposing Social Security’s 'death master file,' which for years has been used to track dead people who should no longer receive benefits, to include the names of living people who the government believes should be treated as if they are dead. As a result of being added to the death database, they would be blacklisted from a coveted form of identity that allows them to make and spend money. The initial names are limited to people the administration says are convicted criminals and 'suspected terrorists,' the documents show. But officials said the effort could broaden to include others in the country without authorization.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I see the sinister visage of Stephen Miller looming over the "death master file." But let us not hold him wholly accountable. The cruelty of the entire Trump mob is a reproof of humanity. Decent people would step away. These are not decent people.

Abha Bhattarai, et al., of the Washington Post: “An escalating trade war with China sent stocks tumbling Thursday, even as ... Donald Trump downplayed the sell-off, saying he’s 'very, very happy with the way the country is running.' Whipsawing tariff policies — including temporarily lowering dozens of countries’ rates, but dramatically raising levies on Chinese imports — have sent markets seesawing in the past 48 hours. The S&P 500 on Wednesday posted its biggest one-day jump since 2008, but by Thursday afternoon about a third of those gains had been reversed. The S&P 500 fell more than 3.44 percent and tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index lost 4.26 percent, while the more narrow Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 2.54 percent. The slide picked up momentum shortly after 11 a.m., when the White House said Chinese imports would face tariffs of 145 percent, not 125 percent as Trump previously touted. All three major indexes are down significantly from the beginning of the year, and both the S&P and the Nasdaq have fallen by double digits.”

Bad News. But It Ain't Over Till the Fat Man Sings. Marianna Sotomayor & Jacob Bogage of the Washington Post: “Republicans in Congress approved an agreement Thursday to begin implementing ... Donald Trump’s legislative agenda on taxes and immigration — a deal that could add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The House in a 216 to 214 vote adopted a budget that allows Congress’s GOP majorities to use the reconciliation process, which permits conservatives to bypass a Democratic Senate filibuster so long as the two chambers work in lockstep drafting the policies. Major portions of Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire at the end of the year, and Republicans aim to pair renewing them — at a cost of $5.5 trillion — with new business tax breaks and major new spending to power the White House’s mass deportation campaign. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) signaled an agreement shortly before the vote to cut at least $1.5 trillion in spending. But the chambers remain sharply divided over how to arrive at that figure — and if it will truly reduce the federal deficit, as House hard-liners have demanded.”

Hakyung Kim & Sean Conlon of CNBC: "Stocks fell Thursday, giving back half of the gains from the historic rally seen in the previous session after ... Donald Trump announced a 90-day reprieve on some of his “reciprocal” tariffs. Investors worried that even with the short reprieve on some of the duties, economic activity will be slowed by Trump’s singling out of China with a much higher rate. The S&P 500  sold off 4.5%, while the Nasdaq Composite  slid 5.3%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average  dropped 1,542 points, or 3.8%."

From CNBC's live updates: "The U.S. tariff rate on Chinese imports now effectively totals 145%, a White House official confirmed to CNBC. Trump’s latest executive order hikes tariffs on Beijing to 125% from 84%. But that comes on top of a 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump previously imposed on China."

Daisuke Wakabayashi, et al., of the New York Times: “A dizzying escalation of tariffs has unraveled a trade relationship between the United States and China forged over decades, jeopardizing the fate of two superpowers and threatening to drag down the world economy.... As hard as Mr. Trump has pushed [raising tariff rates on China to 125 145 percent], China has refused to back down. China has elevated its tariffs on goods imported from America to 84 percent.... At risk is a relationship that shaped the global economy in the 21st century. For years, both sides benefited. American companies’ extensive use of China’s factories kept prices in check for American consumers and padded the profits of the country’s biggest companies. China got jobs and investment that lifted millions of Chinese families out of poverty. And as China’s spending power grew, it opened up a giant and lucrative market for American brands.... The looming disruption to the flow of billions of dollars worth of goods between China and the United States, as well as the trade that often passes through other countries, will have a devastating impact on both economies and their trading partners.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The underlying problem is, as Krugman writes (also linked below), "Trump Is Stupid, Erratic and Weak." And the "stupid" part includes Trump's inability to understand that -- with careful trade planning, policy & negotiation -- U.S.-China trade can be largely "win-win." Being an ignorant bully, Trump understands only a "zero sum game": I win only if you lose.

In a New York Times column titled "Who Needs Free Trade When You Can Raise Your Own Chickens?" David French contrasts the left's and right's versions of back-to-the-land. He writes, “I feel a degree of moral kinship with critics of free markets on the left and the right. I share many of their cultural values and cultural concerns. I do not, however, share their belief that the government should limit my economic opportunities for my own good.” MB: That, I think is the crux of it. It's great if I want to grow my own Romaine & watch my kids plant pumpkin seeds in our homemade compost-rich soil. But I should not encourage the government to make avocados too costly for you to buy at the supermarket.

Marie: I embed these late-night monologues, in general, because we need the laughs. But I also sometimes embed them because the comedians cover particulars in more depth than news articles do. So, for instance, in his monologue last night, Jimmy Kimmel went into remarks Trump made at an NRCC dinner Tuesday evening. And what Kimmel riffed on did a lot to make the case of what a narcissistic moron Trump is:

The other day, Rachel Maddow went looking for waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government. Kinda her own Deputy Doge project. Right away, she was successful! ~~~

~~~~~~~~~~

Blinkity Blink Blink. Ana Swanson & Tony Romm of the New York Times: “Just hours after he put punishing levies into place on nearly 60 countries, the president said he would pause them for 90 days. But Mr. Trump did not extend that pause to China, opting instead to raise tariffs again on all Chinese imports, bringing those taxes to a whopping 125 percent.... Nearly every U.S. trading partner now faces a 10 percent blanket tariff, on top of 25 percent tariffs that Mr. Trump has imposed on cars, steel and aluminum.... Mr. Trump, who for days had insisted he was not concerned about the market rout, acknowledged on Wednesday that the downturn had fed into his decision.... Mr. Trump’s change in course came amid a sharp sell-off in U.S. government bond markets and the dollar, which are typically seen as the safest corner for investors during times of turmoil. Asked Wednesday if the bond market reaction had caught his attention, Mr. Trump said he noticed over the weekend that investors were getting 'queasy.'... Slumping markets quickly rallied after Mr. Trump’s post. The S&P 500 climbed several percentage points in a matter of minutes and closed with a rise of more than 9 percent, sharply reversing days of losses. Wednesday was the best day for the S&P 500 since the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis....

“Earlier in the day, Mr. Trump had told Americans to 'BE COOL!' and quickly followed up with a post saying 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! That prompted some Democrats to suggest that Mr. Trump was intentionally manipulating stock markets. In a hearing in the House of Representatives Wednesday, several Democrats questioned Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, about the president’s aim.” ~~~

The shock to confidence could potentially have an even larger effect on the economy than the tariffs themselves. -- Neel Kashkari, Minneapolis Federal Reserve president, this week ~~~

~~~ Rebecca Patterson in a New York Times op-ed: “In financial markets, the most important place to check for damage is the market for U.S. Treasuries. The U.S. government bond market is by far the world’s largest. Treasury yields serve as an anchor for borrowing costs for American households and companies and for governments overseas. Hints of distress in Treasuries can quickly create contagion around the world and amplify investor worries about global growth back at home. Not surprisingly, then, when the U.S. 30-year Treasury bond yield briefly rose above 5 percent before the tariff pause — its sharpest increase since 2020, according to Bloomberg — bond markets beyond America's borders reacted as well.... Even if American tariff levels settle at a lower level than what was proposed on April 2, questions about what’s next, as well as the impact of the remaining tariffs, could keep growth and inflation uncertainty alive.... [A number of Trump's] moves could reduce foreign demand for U.S. Treasuries, the bedrock of American finance.” MB: You will notice that Patterson makes the common mistake of assuming Trump acts rationally. ~~~

~~~ Maybe stick with Paul Krugman, whose headline is, "Trump Is Stupid, Erratic and Weak": "We’re in a hardly better place than we were before Donald Trump announced a tariff pause (in a Truth Social post, of course.) In fact, we may be in a worse place. Let me make four points about Trump’s post-pause tariff regime. 1. Even the post-pause tariff rates represent a huge protectionist shock[.] 2. Destructive uncertainty about future policy has increased[.] 3. We’re still at risk of a major financial crisis[.] 4. The world now knows that Trump is weak as well as erratic[.]" ~~~

~~~ Jorge Liboreiro of Euro News: “The European Union has temporarily paused its counter-tariffs against the United States to further pursue talks with Donald Trump's administration on how to resolve what, until a few hours ago, was shaping up to be an all-out trade war. The suspension will remain in place for at least 90 days. The counter-tariffs, imposed in reaction to Trump's duties on steel and aluminum, were approved on Wednesday by member states, targeting almost €21 billion in American products, such as soybeans, copper, iron, motorbikes, boats and orange juice.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: My first thought upon reading about Trump's partial reversal was what fun he was having messing with billions of people around the world. My second was, "insider trading." How much did Bessent, Lutnick, Musk & other insiders make in the markets Wednesday when they learned -- before the rest of us -- that Trump was about to announce a partial reversal of his stupid tariffs? I was glad to see that Democratic Senators Richard Blumenthal & Adam Schiff raise the issue of insider trading, too. Blumenthal noted that the Trump administration was full of grifters. ~~~

     ~~~ Nick Popli of Time: "Senator Adam Schiff on Wednesday called on Congress to investigate whether ... Donald Trump engaged in insider trading or market manipulation when he abruptly paused a sweeping set of tariffs, a move that sent stock prices skyrocketing. 'I’m going to do my best to find out,' Schiff, a California Democrat, tells Time. 'Family meme coins and all the rest of it are not beyond insider trading or enriching themselves.' Schiff’s comments regarding a formal inquiry, which has not been previously reported, came soon after the S&P 500 surged more than 9% Wednesday afternoon after Trump announced the tariff pause. 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!' Trump posted on Truth Social minutes after the market opened on Wednesday, along with the letters 'DJT,' which stands for both his initials and the ticker for his media company.... Schiff is the first Senator to openly call for a congressional investigation into potential insider trading by the Trump Administration.... Still, the timing of Trump’s announcement — and the market rally that followed — has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. 'When my own barber asks me whether Donald Trump is selling short or doing this to try to make money for himself, it shows that a lot of people are pretty suspicious about what’s going on,' Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, tells Time.” A related Mother Jones story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ AND. Bernard Condon of the AP: When Trump wrote on social media Wednesday at 9:37 am ET, “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” “it was a prescient call by the president. Maybe too prescient. 'He’s loving this, this control over markets, but he better be careful,' said Trump critic and former White House ethics lawyer, Richard Painter, noting that securities law prohibits trading on insider information or helping others do so. 'The people who bought when they saw that post made a lot of money.'... Asked about when he arrived at his decision, Trump gave a muddled answer. 'I would say this morning,' he said. 'Over the last few days, I’ve been thinking about it.' He then added, 'Fairly early this morning.'... Another curiosity of the posting was Trump’s signoff with his initials. DJT is also the stock symbol for Trump Media and Technology Group.... The ambiguity about what Trump meant didn’t stop people from pouring money into that stock. Trump Media closed up 22.67%, soaring twice as much as the broader market, a stunning performance by a company that lost $400 million last year and is seemingly unaffected by whether tariffs would be imposed or paused.... Trump Media was bested, albeit by only two-hundreds of a percentage point, by another Trump administration stock pick — Elon Musk’s Tesla.... 'He’s sending the message that he can effectively and with impunity manipulate the market, [Kathleen Clark of Washington University Law] said, 'As in: Watch this space for future stock tips.'” A Washington Post story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I believe I see some evidence of insider trading there. ~~~

Tyler Pager, et al., of the New York Times: “The economic turmoil, particularly a rapid rise in government bond yields, caused Mr. Trump to blink on Wednesday afternoon and pause his 'reciprocal' tariffs for most countries for the next 90 days, according to four people with direct knowledge of the president’s decision.... Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and others on the president’s team, including Vice President JD Vance, had been pushing for a more structured approach to the trade conflict that would focus on isolating China as the worst actor while still sending a broader message that Mr. Trump was serious about cracking down on trade imbalances. After his reversal on social media, Mr. Trump’s team was put in the unenviable position of trying to spin the media that this was the plan all along.... Mr. Bessent went so far as to deny that the bond market had driven the change.... Mr. Bessent played a significant role in steering the president toward the pause. But the real credit, Mr. Trump’s advisers admit privately, should go to the bond markets. Mr. Trump’s decision was driven by fear that his tariffs gamble could quickly turn into a financial crisis. And unlike the two previous crashes of the past 20 years — the global financial crisis of 2008 and the pandemic of 2020 — this crisis would have been directly attributable to only one man.” ~~~

I guess they say it was the biggest day in financial history. -- Donald Trump, yesterday, after his post that upended his tariff policy ~~~

      ~~~ Michael Birnbaum, et al., of the Washington Post: “Washington woke up Wednesday to the highest tariffs on foreign goods in a century and to bond markets flashing warning signs that ... Donald Trump’s bid to remake global trade could spark a far bigger crisis. Trump’s advisers were still projecting confidence that his effort to restructure the world’s economy and sweep away generations of globalization was foolproof despite the S&P 500 wiping away 12 percent of its value in a week.... But hours later, Trump partially backed down — escalating his trade war with China but lowering many of the tariffs he had just imposed on the rest of the world. Stock markets soared.... From Tuesday evening to Wednesday afternoon, Trump and his trade advisers spoke to several Republican lawmakers and top foreign leaders who raised concerns about the faltering global markets and the growing concerns of a worldwide recession, urging him to do something.” The reporters relate various people who they say may have influenced Trump, including, for instance, Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter.

Bonds, U.S. Bonds. Trumpity-Doo-Dah. Eshe Nelson, et al., of the New York Times: “Stocks surged on Wednesday afternoon, ripping higher after ... [Donald] Trump said he would back down on tariffs for most of the world for the next 90 days, citing new talks with foreign nations. The S&P 500 climbed over 7 percent in a matter of minutes after Mr. Trump posted the decision on Truth Social, sharply reversing days of losses. But Mr. Trump said that the pause did not extend to China and that he would instead raise tariffs on its exports to 125 percent after Beijing announced a new round of retaliation.... Earlier in the day, when stocks were still oscillating between small gains and losses, Mr. Trump posted ]BE COOL' on his Truth Social platform, before adding, 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!'” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: He really gets a kick out of jerking everybody around, doesn't he? This is the dominance game Bouie is writing about here: ~~~

~~~ Jamelle Bouie of the New York Times: “There is no grand plan or strategic vision [to Donald Trump's obsession with tariffs] ... — only the impulsive actions of a mad king, untethered from any responsibility to the nation or its people.... Trump’s tariffs are not a policy as we traditionally understand it. What they are is an instantiation of his psyche: a concrete expression of his zero-sum worldview. The fundamental truth of Donald Trump is that he apparently cannot conceive of any relationship between individuals, peoples or states as anything other than a status game, a competition for dominance.... Trump’s ... obsession with territorial conquest ... is an obvious product of his predatory approach to human interaction. His authoritarian attempts to cow and coerce key institutions of civil society into compliance with his agenda and obedience to his will are, likewise, a kind of dominance game.... He even said as much during an event on Tuesday, when he bragged about the law firms 'signing up with Trump' and said that 'they give me a lot of money, considering they’ve done nothing wrong.'... If we view the president’s actions in light of his psychological need to dominate, it is almost certainly true that his flagrant abuse of the rights of migrants, asylum seekers and foreign-born students in the United States ... is just the beginning.... There is no point at which he can be satisfied.” (Also linked yesterday.)

Daniel Gilbert of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump is pledging to target the pharmaceutical industry with tariffs even while pausing many of his global levies for 90 days, threatening to disrupt international supply chains and raising the prospect of a clash between drugmakers and insurers that could determine whether patients are hit with higher costs. Trump said Tuesday that his administration will 'be announcing very shortly a major tariff on pharmaceuticals,' a bid to force companies to make more of their medicines in the United States. On Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said a 90-day pause Trump announced on most of his country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs would not apply to sector-specific tariffs such as pharmaceuticals.” An ABC News report is here.

RAS found a recommendation that every invoice should include a line breaking out the Trump Tariff Surcharge to show the consumer how Trump's tariffs figure into what he has to pay for a product. Seems like an excellent idea.

Yan Zhuang of the New York Times: “Much of the world was focused at that moment on his trade war, but Mr. Trump wanted to talk about showers.... 'I like to take a nice shower to take care of my beautiful hair,' [he] ... said on Wednesday in the Oval Office. 'I stand under the shower for 15 minutes until it gets wet. It comes out drip, drip, drip. It’s ridiculous.'... He offered this insight while signing an executive order to loosen restrictions on water flow from American shower heads. The order directs Energy Secretary Chris Wright to rescind a definition of shower heads first implemented by President Barack Obama. It is the second time that Mr. Trump as president has attempted to redefine a shower head. A rule he introduced in his first term drastically increased the amount of water that showers with multiple nozzles could use. The Biden administration later reversed that change.” ~~~ 

     ~~~ Marie: If I'm not mistaken, shower manufacturers, probably because of dueling executive orders, merely put a small metal gizmo in shower heads that reduces the water flow. The gizmo is easily removed. (I vaguely recall having removed one myself.) So Trump's plumbers probably despise him and enjoy saying, “I'm sorry, sir. There's nothing I can do.” And, as Zhuang writes, “If your water pressure is weak, according to the Appliances Standard Awareness Project, it’s probably because of your home plumbing or because of lime scale buildup on the shower head, rather than anything to do with the flow rate.”

Perhaps because of the Trump Tariffs that remain, we can honestly sing, "Yes, We Have No Bananas." But we are nevertheless residents of the world's largest banana republic. ~~~

~~~ Welcome to Our New, Official Tinpot Dictatorship. Chris Cameron of the New York Times: Donald “Trump on Wednesday signed executive orders punishing two officials from his first administration and an elite law firm, continuing a campaign of retribution that he has gleefully carried out since his inauguration. Two executive orders targeted Christopher Krebs, who as a senior cybersecurity official oversaw the securing of the 2020 presidential election, and Miles Taylor, who served as chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during Mr. Trump’s first term and anonymously wrote a high-profile opinion article for The New York Times in 2018. Among other measures, the orders directed Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, to investigate the former officials and report their findings to the White House. A third order targeted the law firm Susman Godfrey with many of the same sanctions that Mr. Trump has applied to other law firms that had taken on cases or causes he did not like. In 2023, Fox News agreed to pay $787.5 million to resolve a defamation suit filed by Dominion Voting Systems over the network’s promotion of misinformation about the 2020 election. Susman Godfrey represented Dominion, a manufacturer of voting machines that lawyers allied with Mr. Trump attacked with outlandish claims about widespread voting fraud.” ~~~

     ~~~ Adam Cancryn & Maggie Miller of Politico: “A president ordering investigations of specific individuals whom he considers to be his political enemies is a remarkable breach of the traditional wall of separation between the White House and the Justice Department. Under that norm of separation, criminal investigations are supposed to be insulated from political pressure, but Trump has repeatedly scorned the notion of DOJ independence. Making Wednesday’s action even more remarkable, and perhaps unprecedented, is that Trump used the formal power of executive orders to effectively brand two individuals as subjects of criminal investigations.” ~~~

It was somebody that went out and wrote a book and said all sorts of terrible things or all lies. And it was like he was this gentleman or that gentleman, like I dealt with him all the time. I had no idea who this guy was. I said, Who the hell is Miles Taylor? And he made a living on going on CNN talking about the president. And I think what he did, he wrote a book, Anonymous, said all sorts of lies, bad things. And I think it’s like a traitor. It’s like spying, he walks into the office, he’s supposed to be sitting here. A lot of people, you know, I’ll be here and there’ll be 20 people standing in the room, there’ll oftentimes be young people in the office. I assume he was one of them at least. -- Donald Trump, commenting on his reason for ordering an investigation of Miles Taylor ~~~

     ~~~ Alex Griffing of Mediaite: “Trump went so far as to accuse [Miles] Taylor of committing treason, a capital offense, for writing about what he saw during Trump’s first term.” MB: Do read Trump's entire monologue; it's another fine example of Trump's very good brain doing its ingenious “weave.” ~~~

~~~ Charlie Nash of Mediaite: “... Donald Trump shocked conservatives and liberals alike on Wednesday after he ordered an investigation into his former cybersecurity appointee Chris Krebs for 'falsely and baselessly' denying 'that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen.'... Trump’s memo received backlash on Wednesday from social media users who called the review 'Stalinesque' and pointed out that it was Trump who appointed Krebs in the first place.” MB: The comments Nash reports are well-worth reading. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I was a little troubled by the peremptory pardons President Biden gave to some family members and other high-profile people who had displeased Trump. Biden was right. Of course if Pam & Kristi had any integrity, they would refuse to carry out these unconstitutional orders. But they are not. Pam will come up with some rude, tough-gal public response (see Berman-Roebuck story linked below) before cracking down on Krebs & Taylor, & Kristi is pondering what costume she should wear to the interrogations (see Rachel Maddow's segment, embedded here yesterday afternoon). To be clear, this does not happen in a democracy. When a former president secretly did something similar, he was forced to resign. (Yes, it appears Trump caused some illegal tax audits to be conducted, but that has not been proved.) ~~~

~~~ Jessica Silver-Greenberg & Matthew Goldstein of the New York Times: “The leader of the pro bono practice at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison is resigning from the law firm, within weeks of the elite firm striking a deal with ... [Donald] Trump to lift an executive order that had threatened its ability to represent clients with business before the federal government. Steven Banks, a former New York City social services commissioner, said in a statement he was leaving his post at Paul Weiss, where he has served as special counsel for the past three years, in order to return to ... work for the rights of the homeless by providing legal services to the Coalition for the Homeless and The Legal Aid Society.” ~~~

~~~ Devlin Barrett of the New York Times: “The Justice Department on Wednesday barred its lawyers from attending any American Bar Association events, escalating the Trump administration’s battle with the legal profession over who lawyers should take on as clients. In a memo, the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, said that the bar association was 'free to litigate in support of activist causes' but that the department’s employees 'must conduct themselves in a manner that does not undermine or appear to undermine the department’s core mission of administering justice in a fair, effective, and evenhanded manner.' The department, Mr. Blanche wrote, 'will no longer use taxpayer funds to pay for any travel to or engagement with A.B.A. events.' Any department employees who work in policy-related positions also may not 'speak at, attend, or otherwise participate in' the association’s events in their official capacity, the memo continued, adding that those employees may not hold positions in the association or renew their memberships. Mr. Blanche also barred those employees from writing or publishing material in 'A.B.A.-sponsored media' without his specific approval.”

In case you were hoping that inspectors general or other government watchdogs could put a stop to some of Trump & Co.'s illegal and/or unconstitutinal moves, Chief Supreme Johnnie says, Not now." ~~~

~~~ Ann Marimow of the Washington Post: “Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Wednesday allowed the Trump administration to temporarily remove a pair of independent regulators while the full Supreme Court decides how to proceed with their cases that have broad implications for at least two dozen other agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board. The brief administrative order from Roberts, which does not address the merits of the cases, came less than three hours after the administration asked the court to quickly schedule argument in the matter for May.... Donald Trump has moved aggressively to seize greater control of the bureaucracy, ousting independent watchdogs and removing the two Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission, which protects consumers from deceptive practices and monopoly power. The cases before the Supreme Court involve Gwynne Wilcox of the National Labor Relations Board, which oversees laws protecting workers’ rights, and Cathy A. Harris of the Merit Systems Protection Board, which protects federal government workers from partisan practices — as well as a 90-year-old court precedent the Trump administration said it will seek to overturn.”

Eileen Sullivan of the New York Times: “The Trump administration is once again free to fire probationary employees. For now. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in a 2-to-1 decision, sided with the government on Wednesday to block a lower-court ruling in Maryland that had led to the reinstatement of thousands of federal workers who had been fired in February. The purge of the employees had marked one of the first stages of ... [Donald] Trump’s plan to rapidly downsize the civil service and overhaul or eliminate entire offices and programs. Since then, the status of the workers has been tied up in legal battles over whether the firings had been carried out lawfully. The Wednesday appeals court decision came a day after the Supreme Court blocked a similar ruling in California reining in the government in a separate case. There is now no court order in place to stop the government from firing probationary employees. Both courts ruled on narrow issues of standing: whether the probationary firings harmed the plaintiffs so much that they had the right to sue in district court.” 

Everything Is Going Very Smoothly: Patel Fired as Acting ATF Director. Alanna Richer & Lolita Baldor of the AP: “FBI Director Kash Patel has been removed as the acting chief of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and has been replaced with the Army secretary.... It was not immediately clear why Patel was replaced by Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll to lead the Justice Department agency that’s responsible for enforcing the nation’s gun laws. One person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel move, said Patel was removed at the end of February, just days after he was sworn in. But that was never publicly announced. Patel on Wednesday afternoon remained on the agency’s website and was identified as the acting director in an April 7 press release. In March, he posted on social media a note he sent to the ATF workforce that read 'special message from the acting director.' And senior ATF leaders were only informed Wednesday of the change.... Driscoll will remain secretary of the Army, according to a defense official. This puts a defense leader — with an already large job — in charge of a domestic law enforcement agency. U.S. defense officials have historically tried to maintain a strict divide between military forces and law enforcement.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Just more evidence that the administration doesn't know what it's doing. According to the headline in the Daily Beast (firewalled), Patel was dismissed for not showing up for weeks at his ATF office. the answer to "Who knows?" is "Nobody knows for certain." The incompetence of this administration is remarkable. 

Catie Edmondson, et al., of the New York Times: “Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday was forced to delay a vote on the Republican budget blueprint to unlock ... [Donald] Trump’s domestic agenda, after conservatives balked at a plan that they said would add too much to the nation’s debt. In a dramatic scene on Capitol Hill that laid bare Republican divisions, Mr. Johnson huddled with the holdouts in a room off the House floor for over an hour before the vote was scheduled to begin, grinding activity in the chamber to a halt....” MB: The report doesn't specifically say so, but MSNBC contributors -- as well as Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), ranking member of the House Budget Committee -- made clear that what the holdouts objected to was that the budget resolution did not cut enough from social safety net programs like Medicaid. The AP report, by Lisa Mascaro & Kevin Freking, does a better job of it.

Oops!? Josh Gerstein & Kyle Cheney of Politico: “Federal prosecutors have abruptly abandoned the criminal case against a Virginia man portrayed by the Justice Department as a major leader of the brutal Central American gang MS-13. Authorities moved Wednesday to dismiss their prosecution of Henrry Villatoro Santos, whose arrest was celebrated by ... Donald Trump, the attorney general and head of the FBI. Instead, the Trump administration seems poised to seek Villatoro’s quick deportation, despite holding up his arrest as a triumph for the president’s crackdown on violent transnational gangs. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin all appeared before TV cameras during a rare press conference at the FBI’s Manassas, Virginia, office last month to tout the arrest of Villatoro, who officials described as one of the gang’s most senior bosses in the U.S.... Muhammad Elsayed, his attorney, in a self-described 'unusual' motion, asked the magistrate judge who locked up Villatoro not to let the government drop the criminal case yet. Doing so, the lawyer said, might result in a quick deportation of the kind the Trump administration deployed against hundreds of Venezuelan nationals last month, devoid of the due process....”

Jacob Rosen & Melissa Quinn of CBS News: "Federal judges in both New York and Texas have blocked the deportations of Venezuelan men likely to be deported under the Trump administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, again stopping the White House's attempts to remove alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang after the Supreme Court cleared the way for their deportations this week. In one case filed in Manhattan, attorneys for two Venezuelan men who are currently being detained in Orange County, New York, successfully argued to block their clients' deportations and movement outside of the state and the United States. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, appointed to the federal bench by President Clinton, granted the temporary relief. After their arrests, both men were first transferred to an ICE detention center in Texas before being moved to New York. One man, who is 21, came to the U.S. to escape Tren de Aragua violence, and the other, who is 32, actively protested the regime of Venezuelan dictator Nicholas Maduro, their attorneys wrote. The new case in Texas was brought on behalf of the same Venezuelans who challenged their potential deportation in Washington, D.C., where the initial block of the deportations was entered by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg before it was lifted by the Supreme Court on Monday in a 5-4 decision. The Texas judge overseeing the petition, Fernando Rodriguez Jr., was appointed to the federal bench by President Trump during his first term." (Also linked yesterday.) The New York Times report is here.

Mark Berman & Jeremy Roebuck of the Washington Post: “Attorney General Pam Bondi this week complied with a federal judge’s orders in a court case — and made clear she didn’t like doing it.... The judge required Bondi and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, to notify other federal agencies that they must refrain from implementing parts of Trump’s order ... punishing the law firm Jenner & Block.... In her memo, which was submitted in court Tuesday and also attributed to Vought, Bondi bluntly signaled she was begrudgingly following a court order. Bondi also referred to what she called 'an unelected' judge who 'invaded the policy-making and free speech prerogatives of the executive branch' by making demands beyond his jurisdiction.... In a separate filing on Tuesday, the Justice Department also argued for dismissing Jenner & Block’s lawsuit. The department said Trump’s order is lawful and that his actions are all within the bounds of his power.”

DOGE Caves. Hannah Natanson & Lisa Rein of the Washington Post: “Elon Musk’s cost-cutting operation, the U.S. DOGE Service, set off a panic in March among elderly and disabled people after proposing that the Social Security Administration scrap many of its claims services over the phone in an effort to end alleged identity fraud. Beneficiaries began lining up at field offices across the country, clutching driver’s licenses and asking if they must prove who they were in person. Phone wait times ballooned and the agency’s website started crashing almost daily under a crush of panicked callers and visitors. Besieged by angry constituents, lawmakers demanded that the acting commissioner end the chaos. Now, after nearly a month of chaos and backlash, the DOGE plans are dead. According to an internal memo obtained by The Washington Post, plans to force people awarded retirement, disability and Medicare benefits to set up direct-deposit payments online or in person have been canceled after the agency concluded it could vet these transactions for fraud by phone.” The Hill's story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Rachel Maddow has pointed out several times that this is no way to run a government: (1) destroy a service; (2) wait for mass protests, outrage and/or panic; (3) reinstate service (or say you will).

Michael Gold of the New York Times: “The House passed legislation on Wednesday that would bar federal district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, part of an escalating Republican campaign to take aim at judges who have moved to halt some of ... [Donald] Trump’s executive orders. The bill, approved mostly along party lines on a vote of 219 to 213, would largely limit district court judges to issuing narrow orders that pertain to parties involved in a specific lawsuit, rather than broader ones that can block a policy or action from being enforced throughout the country. It would make an exception in cases that were brought by multiple states, which would need to be heard by a three-judge panel. It faces a slim chance of becoming law because of the obstacles it faces in the Senate, where seven Democrats would have to join Republicans to allow it to advance. So far, similar bills have not been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee.”

Catie Edmondson, et al., of the New York Times: “Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday was forced to delay a vote on the Republican budget blueprint to unlock ... [Donald] Trump’s domestic agenda, after conservatives balked at a plan that they said would add too much to the nation’s debt. In a dramatic scene on Capitol Hill that laid bare Republican divisions, Mr. Johnson huddled with the holdouts in a room off the House floor for over an hour before the vote was scheduled to begin, grinding activity in the chamber to a halt....” MB: The report doesn't specifically say so, but MSNBC contributors -- as well as Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), ranking member of the House Budget Committee -- made clear that what the holdouts objected to was that the budget resolution did not cut enough from social safety net programs like Medicaid. The AP report, by Lisa Mascaro & Kevin Freking, does a better job of it.

Annals of "Journalism," Ha Ha Ha. Maddie Lauria of NPR: "A Delaware judge, once again, has found that a conservative news outlet broadcast false and defamatory claims about the role a voting technology company played in the 2020 presidential election. This time, that network is Newsmax, Fox News' upstart rival, which is fresh off a successful initial public offering. Following Joe Biden's victory over Donald Trump that November, Trump's allies and supporters took to right-wing media to accuse Dominion Voting Systems of rigging the vote to help Biden. In his opinion, Judge Eric M. Davis says Dominion 'presents clear and convincing evidence' that shows Newsmax broadcast segments with inaccurate information that 'would likely cause reasonable viewers to think significantly less favorably about Dominion than if the viewers knew the truth.'... If the lawsuit heads to trial as scheduled later this month, the jury will be asked to decide whether to award damages and how much, and whether the broadcasts were aired with 'actual malice,' which means knowledge of falsity or disregard for the truth."

News Lede

New York Times: “At least four people died when a helicopter tumbled out of the sky and plunged into the Hudson River just off Jersey City, N.J., across from the West Village in Manhattan on Thursday afternoon, according to people briefed on the rescue efforts and video footage of the crash. At least two adults and three children — all believed to be members of a family of Spanish tourists — were pulled from the helicopter or from the frigid river and taken to hospitals in New Jersey, officials briefed on the crash said. A sixth person, believed to be the pilot, was unaccounted for. The helicopter went down in the river near a ventilation building above the Holland Tunnel, at about 3:15 p.m. Here is what else we know:

  • Witness and video accounts: Video of the crash shows the helicopter tumbling end over end and hitting the water at a high speed. One witness, Mandy Bowlin, said she was on a Circle Line tour boat, heard a boom behind her and saw the helicopter plummeting. Its rotor flew off and the craft nose-dived into the water, sending debris flying toward the boat.

  • The route: It is not known where the helicopter took off from or where it was headed. Tourist helicopters routinely fly over the river, carrying sightseers from heliports in Lower Manhattan and New Jersey. The typical temperature of the river this time of year is about 45 degrees, according to a government site.” This is a liveblog. In an update, Gov. Kathy Hochul has put the number of those who died in the accident as six.

     ~~~ Update. The New York Times' full story is here. The AP story is here.
Wednesday
Apr092025

The Conversation -- April 9, 2025

Trumpity-Doo-Dah. Eshe Nelson, et al., of the New York Times: “Stocks surged on Wednesday afternoon, ripping higher after ... [Donald] Trump said he would back down on tariffs for most of the world for the next 90 days, citing new talks with foreign nations. The S&P 500 climbed over 7 percent in a matter of minutes after Mr. Trump posted the decision on Truth Social, sharply reversing days of losses. But Mr. Trump said that the pause did not extend to China and that he would instead raise tariffs on its exports to 125 percent after Beijing announced a new round of retaliation.... Earlier in the day, when stocks were still oscillating between small gains and losses, Mr. Trump posted ]BE COOL' on his Truth Social platform, before adding, 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!'” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: He really gets a kick out of jerking everybody around, doesn't he? This is the dominance game Bouie is writing about here: ~~~

~~~ Jamelle Bouie of the New York Times: “There is no grand plan or strategic vision [to Donald Trump's obsession with tariffs] ... — only the impulsive actions of a mad king, untethered from any responsibility to the nation or its people.... Trump’s tariffs are not a policy as we traditionally understand it. What they are is an instantiation of his psyche: a concrete expression of his zero-sum worldview. The fundamental truth of Donald Trump is that he apparently cannot conceive of any relationship between individuals, peoples or states as anything other than a status game, a competition for dominance.... Trump’s ... obsession with territorial conquest ... is an obvious product of his predatory approach to human interaction. His authoritarian attempts to cow and coerce key institutions of civil society into compliance with his agenda and obedience to his will are, likewise, a kind of dominance game.... He even said as much during an event on Tuesday, when he bragged about the law firms 'signing up with Trump' and said that 'they give me a lot of money, considering they’ve done nothing wrong.'... If we view the president’s actions in light of his psychological need to dominate, it is almost certainly true that his flagrant abuse of the rights of migrants, asylum seekers and foreign-born students in the United States ... is just the beginning.... There is no point at which he can be satisfied.”

Rachel Maddow does a number on ICE fashion model Kristi Noem: ~~~

Jacob Rosen & Melissa Quinn of CBS News: "Federal judges in both New York and Texas have blocked the deportations of Venezuelan men likely to be deported under the Trump administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, again stopping the White House's attempts to remove alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang after the Supreme Court cleared the way for their deportations this week. In one case filed in Manhattan, attorneys for two Venezuelan men who are currently being detained in Orange County, New York, successfully argued to block their clients' deportations and movement outside of the state and the United States. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, appointed to the federal bench by President Clinton, granted the temporary relief. After their arrests, both men were first transferred to an ICE detention center in Texas before being moved to New York. One man, who is 21, came to the U.S. to escape Tren de Aragua violence, and the other, who is 32, actively protested the regime of Venezuelan dictator Nicholas Maduro, their attorneys wrote. The new case in Texas was brought on behalf of the same Venezuelans who challenged their potential deportation in Washington, D.C., where the initial block of the deportations was entered by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg before it was lifted by the Supreme Court on Monday in a 5-4 decision. The Texas judge overseeing the petition, Fernando Rodriguez Jr., was appointed to the federal bench by President Trump during his first term."

~~~~~~~~~~

Lily Kuo of the Washington Post: “Trump’s 'Liberation Day' tariffs on 86 countries came into effect at 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, with successive increases taking the duty on all Chinese goods to 104 percent. Beijing, which on Friday announced it would impose a 34 percent tariff on all American goods in return, did not immediately announce any further retaliatory measures Wednesday. But China’s State Council, its equivalent of the cabinet, stressed the importance of the U.S.-China trade relationship and said that differences should be resolved 'through dialogue and consultation.'... At the same time, Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said China would 'continue to take firm and forceful measures to safeguard its own interests.' Before the tariffs took effect, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt suggested Tuesday that Trump was open to talking — as long as Beijing made the first move.... The mixed signals and the introduction of the tariffs led to another day of significant volatility in Asia, after a day of wild gyrations in U.S. markets.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: What??? Trump creates an international crisis, then insists one of his victims call him first? Is this "High School Dating Game"? ~~~

     ~~~ The New York Times' live updates are here: “After ... [Donald] Trump imposed a 104 percent tariff on Chinese goods, Beijing announced a levy on U.S. goods of 84 percent. Stocks and bonds slumped as Europe also prepared to retaliate against the United States.”

Joe Rennison, et al., of the New York Times: “Another chaotic day of trading on Wall Street ended with a late slide in stock prices, with little letup in the escalating trade tensions and economic anxiety caused by ... [Donald] Trump’s tariffs. The S&P 500 had posted a big gain at the start of trading, rising as much as 4 percent, but the rally faded and stocks slumped in late trading, ending 1.6 percent lower for the day and adding to a string of losses since Mr. Trump announced sweeping tariffs ... last week. Those tariffs are scheduled to take effect at midnight Wednesday, the White House reaffirmed on Tuesday, including raising the tax on goods from China to at least 104 percent. Tuesday’s drop put the benchmark index on the verge of a bear market, defined as a drop of 20 percent or more from its last high. After Tuesday’s drop, the index sits 18.9 percent below its mid-February record, having tumbled more than 12 percent just in the days since Mr. Trump announced his new tariffs.” The AP story is here. (Also linked yesterday.)

It seems that even when a country's representatives do stroke Trump's insatiable ego by calling him first, it does no good: ~~~

     ~~~ Ari Hawkins, et al., of Politico: “... Donald Trump and his top trade officials say they are negotiating with trading partners to reduce the steep tariffs scheduled to go into effect on Wednesday. But many foreign governments who want to talk are still waiting by the phone.... On top of that, Trump officials have not spelled out exactly what concessions the administration is seeking that could pave the way for a negotiated solution. It’s a sign that even as the administration tries to reassure financial markets, business leaders and fellow Republicans that they have an end game for the market-shaking duties, the White House is still very far from reaching any substantive trade deals with major foreign partners. Rapid progress will be even harder because now the administration is trying to negotiate bilateral deals with nearly 100 countries simultaneously to achieve a murky set of goals.”

David Pierson & Barry Wang of the New York Times: “For years, the world’s two biggest powers have flirted with the idea of an economic decoupling as tensions between them have risen. The acceleration this week, in both actions and words, of their trade relationship’s deterioration has made the prospect of such a divorce seem closer than ever.... With China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, and Mr. Trump locked in a game of chicken — each unwilling to risk looking weak by making a concession — the trade fight could spiral out of control, inflaming tensions over other areas of competition like technology and the fate of Taiwan, the self-governing island claimed by Beijing.”

Back to the Nineteenth Century ~~~

Ana Swanson of the New York Times: “Behind ... [Donald] Trump’s decision to hit some of America’s largest trading partners with stiff tariffs is his fixation on the trade deficit that the United States runs with other nations. But many economists say that is a poor metric for judging the quality of a trade relationship. The steep tariffs, which went into effect on nearly 60 trading partners on Wednesday, were calculated based on bilateral trade deficits, or the gap between what the United States sells to each country and what [that country buys from the U.S]. Mr. Trump has long viewed that gap as evidence that America is being 'ripped off' by other countries....

“But ... bilateral trade deficits crop up for many reasons beyond unfair practices.... [For instance,] the United States ... has substantial trade surpluses with the Netherlands and Singapore.... But that’s ... because those countries are home to major ports that import American goods. The Netherlands unloads U.S. goods in its ports and sends them throughout Europe to other consumers, while Singapore does something similar for Asia. But a trade deficit is calculated based on the country the good reaches first, not its ultimate destination.... [Economists] say that, if Mr. Trump’s tariffs do reduce the overall trade deficit, it will more likely be because they tanked the U.S. economy or drove investors away from the United States by sapping the world’s confidence in the U.S. dollar and its markets.”

Chris Velazco, et al., of the Washington Post: “The iPhone is in many ways the ultimate symbol of the age of globalized supply chains.... Trump has declared an 'economic revolution' that seeks to wipe away that system. Instead, he wants those supply chains and parts suppliers to be inside the U.S., employing American workers. 'The army of millions and millions of human beings screwing in little screws to make iPhones, that kind of thing is going to come to America,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said during a TV appearance on CBS News on Sunday.... No matter where those devices are assembled, components such as processors, screens, cameras, memory chips and modems flow from around the world to form finished products. In the case of the iPhone 16 Pro, the total cost of those parts works out to about $507 — just over half of the device’s retail cost, according to data from Counterpoint Research.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Lutnick's statement was garbled -- after claiming "millions of Americans" soon (within "days or weeks") would have the good fortune to spend their days in sweatshops screwing tiny screws into iPhones, he seemed to imply that, no, no, the millions of Americans would be servicing the robots who did the turnings of the screws. Jon Stewart (segment embedded yesterday) made sport of Lutnick's confused predictions. Stewart was not alone, as RAS highlighted in yesterday's Comments. ~~~

     ~~~ Jason Koebler of 404 Media: “The idea of a Made-in-the-USA iPhone has been an obsession for politicians for years, a kind of shorthand goalpost that would signal 'American manufacturing is back' that is nonetheless nowhere close to being a reality and would require a nearly impossible-to-fathom restructuring of the global supply chains that make the iPhone possible in the first place. Over the years, economists and manufacturing experts have attempted to calculate how much an American-made iPhone would cost. In recent days a Quora answer from 2018 that suggests an American iPhone would cost $30,000 has gone repeatedly viral.... [Such] articles are good exercises but they are also total fantasy. There is no universe in which Apple snaps its fingers and begins making the iPhone in the United States overnight. It could theoretically begin assembling them here, but even that is a years-long process made infinitely harder by the fact that, in Trump’s ideal world, every company would be reshoring American manufacturing at the same time, leading to supply chain issues, factory building issues, and exacerbating the already lacking American talent pool for high-tech manufacturing.”

Blink, Blink? Ana Swanson & Alan Rappeport of the New York Times: “The Trump administration signaled on Tuesday that it was ready to negotiate deals with countries targeted by sweeping tariffs, saying that 70 governments had approached the United States to try to roll the levies back and that officials would begin talks with Japan, South Korea and other nations. But ... [Donald] Trump and his advisers have been clear that these entreaties will not stop the next round of tariffs from going into effect just after midnight Wednesday, including another 50 percent duty on China. As a result, tariffs on Chinese goods will be at least 104 percent. In a social media post on Tuesday, Mr. Trump said he had 'a great call' with South Korea’s acting president, Han Duck-soo, about trade and tariffs, and that South Korean officials were heading to the United States for talks. He also expressed optimism that a trade war with China could be averted. 'China also wants to make a deal, badly, but they don’t know how to get it started,' Mr. Trump wrote. 'We are waiting for their call. It will happen!'” (Also linked yesterday.)

Tyler Pager of the New York Times: “Elon Musk slammed ... [Donald] Trump’s top trade adviser [Peter Navarro] as 'dumber than a sack of bricks' on Tuesday, exposing a remarkable rift in the president’s inner circle over the wide-ranging tariffs that have upended the global economy.... The squabble escalated on Monday when Mr. Navarro said on CNBC that Mr. Musk was not a 'car manufacturer' but a 'car assembler' because Tesla, Mr. Musk’s electric vehicle company, relied on parts from around the world. Mr. Musk fired back on Tuesday, calling Mr. Navarro a 'moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks' in a post on X.... Later in the day, Mr. Musk doubled down, posting that he wanted to 'apologize to bricks.'... He also used a slur to refer to Mr. Navarro, calling him 'Peter Retarrdo.' The feud between Mr. Musk and [Mr.] Navarro, who has been the architect of many of Mr. Trump’s trade plans, has been simmering for days as the administration’s new tariffs have caused huge losses across global financial markets.... Mr. Musk’s words — though aimed at Mr. Navarro — were a rare criticism of Mr. Trump’s policies from one of his most influential advisers. Mr. Musk ... is estimated to have lost roughly $31 billion since Mr. Trump announced sweeping tariffs on foreign countries on April 2....” An NBC News story is here. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: If Navarro is a moron & dumber than a sack of bricks because of the tariff policies he has recommended to Trump, it follows that Trump -- who took the dumb advice -- must be a moron, too. Dunnit?

Rob Copeland, et al., of the New York Times: “Wall Street billionaires are not used to being on the outside looking in. But that is where they find themselves after ... [Donald] Trump ignored their appeals to call off his tariff plans which they fear could endanger the economy. With the backdrop of rapidly mounting stock market losses, corporate titans have worked every angle — phone calls, social media and even a typically staid shareholder letter — to try to change Mr. Trump’s mind. The day after the president announced his most sweeping round of tariffs last week, chief executives from major banks, including Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, had a private meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick organized by a lobbying group in Washington. But Mr. Lutnick was not persuaded to reverse course, three people briefed on the sit-down said. Over the weekend, megadonors to Mr. Trump’s re-election effort tried a different tack, pleading their case in calls to Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, people familiar with the calls said. Those efforts also came up empty. By Monday, hedge fund billionaires — many of whom had been loud and proud boosters of Mr. Trump’s second term — were going public with their cries.” (Also linked yesterday.)

Aris Folley & Sylvan Lane of the Hill: “Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) expressed deep frustration with ... [Donald] Trump’s tariffs during a Tuesday hearing featuring the top White House trade negotiator. 'Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?' Tillis asked U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer during his appearance before the Senate Finance Committee. Tillis, a critic of tariffs and protectionist policies, questioned whether the Trump administration had a coherent strategy to rebalance trade after announcing roughly $600 billion in new import taxes last week.... Tillis is one of seven Republican senators who signed on to a bill from Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) that would cut back the president’s authority to unilaterally impose tariffs.” (Also linked yesterday.)

Donald Trump has launched a global economic war without any allies. That is why — unlike previous economic crises in this century — there is no one coming to save the global economy if the situation starts to unravel. -- John Lipsky of the Atlantic Council ~~~

~~~ David Sanger of the New York Times: “As the breadth of the Trump revolution has spread across Washington in recent weeks, its most defining feature is a burn-it-down-first, figure-out-the-consequences-later recklessness. The costs of that approach are now becoming clear. Administration officials knew the markets would dive and other nations would retaliate when ... [Donald] Trump announced his long-promised 'reciprocal' tariffs. But when pressed, several senior officials conceded that they had spent only a few days considering how the economic earthquake might have second-order effects. And officials have yet to describe the strategy for managing a global system of astounding complexity after the initial shock wears off, other than endless threats and negotiations between the leader of the world’s largest economy and everyone else.... The global trading system is only one example of the Trump administration tearing something apart, only to reveal it has no plan for how to replace it.” Sanger gives a number of examples.

Adam Cancryn & Maya Ward of Politico: “During the first two turbulent months of ... Donald Trump’s term, the White House has shrugged off scrutiny of its most controversial policies with a simple assertion: The American people voted for this. Now, Trump allies and GOP voters spooked by the tariff-induced market crash are beginning to respond en masse: No, we didn’t. Trump won in November because many voters saw him as an antidote to their economic malaise; as a candidate, he frequently promised to lower Americans’ everyday prices. But as president, he has chosen instead to plunge the country into fresh financial chaos, while insisting the market losses as a result of his tariffs are 'medicine' Americans need to take. 'Trump was elected in part to lower inflation and juice the economy,' said GOP pollster Whit Ayres. 'Higher prices and slower growth are exactly the opposite of what Americans voted for.'” (Also linked yesterday.)


Happy Birthday to ??? Jenny Gathright
of the Washington Post: “Plans are in motion for a massive event on the National Mall in June to celebrate the Army’s 250th anniversary with live music, fireworks, parachuters landing on the Ellipse — and perhaps the military parade ... Donald Trump has been dreaming about for years.... The news of a potential military parade in D.C. — initially reported by Washington City Paper over the weekend — comes after Trump intended to host one during his first term but backed off amid pushback from the Army and D.C. officials over exorbitant costs and the damage tanks might cause to city roads. Tanks or no tanks, the city can prepare for some kind of massive birthday bash for the Army on June 14, the anniversary of the Continental Congress’s vote to officially create the force.... (That date also happens to be Trump’s birthday.)” Emphasis added. ~~~

Marie: So is this costly bash going to be more about celebrating what George Washington & the Continental Army made possible or commemorating Donald Trump's destruction of all that? See Akhilleus's commentary below.

Yes, It Is "The Dating Game." Michael Grynbaum of the New York Times: “The Trump administration formally barred federal workers from listing their preferred pronouns in email signatures, calling it a symptom of a misguided 'gender ideology.' Some White House officials are taking a similar approach with the journalists who cover them. On at least three recent occasions, senior Trump press aides have refused to engage with reporters’ questions because the journalists listed identifying pronouns in their email signatures. 'As a matter of policy, we do not respond to reporters with pronouns in their bios,' Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, wrote to a New York Times reporter who had inquired about the potential closing of a famed climate research observatory.” MB: I don't know how these people can get more stupid or petty or childish or unserious, but I have every confidence they will find multiple ways to do so.

Andrew Duehren of the New York Times: “The Internal Revenue Service has agreed to help homeland security officials find immigrants they are trying to deport, according to court records, committing to sharing information in what would be a fundamental change in how the tax collector uses its tightly regulated records. In a court filing, the Trump administration said that the I.R.S. and Immigration and Customs Enforcement had reached the agreement on Monday and that the two agencies had not yet shared any information. Under the terms of the deal, a partially redacted version of which was submitted in the case, ICE officials can ask the I.R.S. for information about people who have been ordered to leave the United States or whom they are otherwise investigating. Federal law tightly controls taxpayer information, protecting home addresses, earnings and other data from disclosure even to other agencies within the government. I.R.S. officials have for weeks warned that the Trump administration’s plan to use the I.R.S. to help with deportations could be illegal. The top I.R.S. lawyer was demoted as the agreement came together, and was replaced by a former Trump nominee.” The AP report is here. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ The New York Times story has been updated. New Lede: “Several top Internal Revenue Service officials, including the acting commissioner, are preparing to quit after the Trump administration pushed the agency to use its protected tax records to help homeland security officials deport immigrants, according to people familiar with the matter.... The deal has fueled further turmoil at the top of the agency, which had already been rocked by mass layoffs and several leadership changes during its busiest period of the year.... Among those leaving is Melanie Krause, the acting leader of the I.R.S., who is expected to take the administration’s latest deferred resignation offer....” ~~~

~~~ Josh Marshall's column is firewalled, but Scott Lemieux has a good chunk of it on LG&$ here: “We know that DOGE is in the process of gutting the IRS. According to internal IRS estimates reviewed by The Washington Post, this internal sabotage is already estimated to have cost the U.S. Treasury more than $500 billion in revenues that otherwise would have been raised by April 15th. But it doesn’t stop at the IRS. DOGE is also in the process of essentially closing down the Tax Division at the Department of Justice. Since the Tax Division is a statutory creation, it can’t literally be shuttered.... What they plan to do is essentially 'reform' and 'reorganize' the Tax Division out of existence.... When you combine this with the gutting of the IRS itself, it basically means a radical diminution of tax enforcement in the United States. If you make more than, say, a million dollars a year, paying taxes is probably going to be voluntary going forward. It’s a new feature of billionairedom.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I'm not sure how much that will matter for the 2025 tax year. If Trump keeps his tariff program going, we will have fewer billionaires & multi-millionaires, and nearly all of the has-beens probably will be taking whopping legal deductions for the huge Trump Income Losses. One ingenious way to eliminate tax cheats is to strip away everybody's income.

Michael Bender & Sheryl Stolberg of the New York Times: “The Trump administration has frozen more than $1 billion in funding for Cornell and $790 million for Northwestern amid civil rights investigations into both schools, two U.S. officials said. The funding pause involves mostly grants from and contracts with the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Education and Health and Human Services, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the unannounced decision. The moves are the latest and largest in a rapidly escalating campaign against elite American universities that has resulted in billions in federal funds being suspended or put under review in just over a month. Other schools that have had funds threatened include Brown, Columbia, Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and Princeton. Cornell and Northwestern are both facing investigations into allegations of antisemitism and into accusations of racial discrimination stemming from their efforts to promote diversity.”

Erwin Chemerinsky & Lawrence Tribe in a New York Times op-ed: “Of all the lawless acts by the Trump administration in its first two and a half months, none are more frightening than its dumping of human beings who have not had their day in court into an infamous maximum-security prison in El Salvador — and then contending that no federal court has the authority to right these brazen wrongs. In an astounding brief filed in the Supreme Court on Monday, the solicitor general of the United States argued that even when the government concedes that it has mistakenly deported someone to El Salvador and had him imprisoned there, the federal courts are powerless to do anything about it. The Supreme Court must immediately and emphatically reject this unwarranted claim of unlimited power to deprive people of their liberty without due process.... Why hasn’t the Trump administration acted to secure [Kilmar] Abrego Garcia’s release?... The answer can only be that it is using this case to establish a truly chilling proposition: that no one can stop the Trump administration from imprisoning anyone it wants anywhere else in the world.”

Gaya Gupta & Angie Hernandez of the Washington Post: “When Amir Makled, a civil rights lawyer representing a pro-Palestinian activist, handed over his passport for review at the Detroit Metropolitan Airport on Sunday, he was immediately flagged and led to an interview room for further questioning. The federal border officers told Makled, a U.S. citizen, that they knew he was a lawyer with prominent cases, the Dearborn-based attorney recounted in an interview with The Washington Post. The officers told him he could either hand over his phone and passcode, or they would confiscate it and return the device back to him later. Makled refused, and after nearly two hours, he said, he was allowed to leave with his phone. But Makled and other legal experts said they believe that his questioning is part of an alarming pattern of American lawyers facing retribution for representing clients whose interests conflict with ... Donald Trump’s agenda.”

Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a ruling from a federal judge in California that had ordered the Trump administration to rehire thousands of fired federal workers who had been on probationary status. The court’s brief order said the nonprofit groups that had sued to challenge the dismissals had not suffered the sort of injury that gave them standing to sue. The practical consequences of the ruling may be limited, as another trial judge’s ruling requiring the reinstatement of many of the same workers remains in place. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, but she gave no reasons. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the court should not have ruled on such an important issue in the context of an emergency application. The order was the latest administration victory in the Supreme Court in a case arising from ... [Donald] Trump’s recent blitz of executive orders. Like others, though, it was technical and tentative. The justices said their order would remain in place while the case moved forward.” The AP story is here. (Also linked yesterday.)

Chicken Supreme Tops the Menu at Johnny's Cafe. Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The court led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. over the last two decades has not been known for its modesty or caution. Its signature move has been bold assertions of power backed by sweeping claims about the meaning of the Constitution.... But as the first wave of challenges to ... [Donald] Trump’s blitz of executive orders has reached the justices, a very different portrait of the court is emerging. It has issued a series of narrow and legalistic rulings that seem calculated to avoid the larger issues presented by a president rapidly working to expand power and reshape government.... The justices’ new approach appears to have multiple goals: to stay out of the political fray, to maintain their legitimacy and, perhaps most important, to avoid a showdown with a president who has relentlessly challenged the legitimacy of the courts.” (Also linked yesterday.)

Zach Montague of the New York Times: “A federal judge in Washington rejected the White House’s effort to keep The Associated Press from routinely covering ... [Donald] Trump, siding with the wire service and finding that it had faced political retaliation over its editorial decisions.... [The White House had] cited the wire service’s refusal to adopt the administration’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.... The order dealt a blow to Mr. Trump, who, in a departure from decades of tradition, has moved to leverage access to White House events as a way of asserting more direct control over coverage of his administration. The dispute has raised profound questions about the independent news media’s role in shaping public opinion and the lasting implications of the president’s effort to determine how he is portrayed. Judge Trevor N. McFadden of the Federal District Court for the District of Washington wrote in his opinion that the Trump administration must 'immediately rescind their viewpoint-based denial' of The Associated Press from the White House press corps.” The CBS News report is here. MB: Trump appointed McFadden. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Once again, raspberries to all of the White House press corps for failing to support the AP by boycotting the briefing room. Special shout-out to the reporter who asked, as the first question of Trump the Tariff Terrorist on AF1 Sunday, "How was your golf tournament today?" (See Jon Stewart video, embedded Tuesday.)

Rachel Weiner & Ian Duncan of the Washington Post: “Three air traffic control managers with responsibility for Reagan National Airport have been pushed out of their roles in the wake of a violent altercation in the tower, the Federal Aviation Administration confirmed Tuesday. The changes come a week after a supervisor in the tower was arrested and accused of punching another controller in the face over a minor dispute about work, and they follow efforts by the FAA to reduce stress among staff still grappling with January’s catastrophic midair collision of a passenger plane and a military helicopter. The district manager and two assistant managers were offered reassignment elsewhere.” (Also linked yesterday.) 

Derek Hawkins of the Washington Post: “Under the stained glass and towering arch ceilings of Washington National Cathedral, hundreds of Secret Service members paid their respects Tuesday to an agent who came to symbolize the elite agency’s commitment to bravery and sacrifice in the face of danger. Secret Service agent Clint Hill had hurled himself atop President John F. Kennedy’s uncovered limousine when Lee Harvey Oswald opened fire on the presidential motorcade in Dallas in November 1963. His attempts to shield Kennedy and first lady Jacqueline Kennedy from the shots that killed the president inspired thousands of Secret Service agents who came after him, while the experience left Hill, who died Feb. 21 at his home in Belvedere, California, at age 93, with a deep guilt that haunted him late into his life.”

~~~~~~~~~~

Montana. Erin Reed of Erin in the Morning: "On Tuesday, Montana’s House considered Senate Bill 164, legislation that would classify gender-affirming care for transgender youth as felony child endangerment. The bill would not only target doctors and nurses, but also parents — including those merely passing through the state. Though the vote was expected to be close, a powerful floor speech from Representative SJ Howell prompted a wave of Republican defections. The bill was defeated 40–58, becoming one of several anti-trans proposals to fail this year following strong speeches by Montana’s transgender and nonbinary lawmakers.... The victories in Montana stand in stark contrast to the handful of Democrats and pundits suggesting that transgender people are a political liability.... Montana’s trans and nonbinary legislators only underscore the point—defending transgender people is not just morally right, it is politically possible." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Maybe somebody should tell that to White House press secretary & self-righteous pouty girl Miss Karoline Leavitt, who "as a matter of policy" will not even respond to reporters' inquiries when the reporters specify a pronoun. A pronoun. Or, I beg your pardon; I should not have specified a pronoun.

Monday
Apr072025

The Conversation -- April 8, 2025

Joe Rennison, et al., of the New York Times: “Another chaotic day of trading on Wall Street ended with a late slide in stock prices, with little letup in the escalating trade tensions and economic anxiety caused by ... [Donald] Trump’s tariffs. The S&P 500 had posted a big gain at the start of trading, rising as much as 4 percent, but the rally faded and stocks slumped in late trading, ending 1.6 percent lower for the day and adding to a string of losses since Mr. Trump announced sweeping tariffs ... last week. Those tariffs are scheduled to take effect at midnight Wednesday, the White House reaffirmed on Tuesday, including raising the tax on goods from China to at least 104 percent. Tuesday’s drop put the benchmark index on the verge of a bear market, defined as a drop of 20 percent or more from its last high. After Tuesday’s drop, the index sits 18.9 percent below its mid-February record, having tumbled more than 12 percent just in the days since Mr. Trump announced his new tariffs.” The AP story is here.

Blink, Blink? Ana Swanson & Alan Rappeport of the New York Times: “The Trump administration signaled on Tuesday that it was ready to negotiate deals with countries targeted by sweeping tariffs, saying that 70 governments had approached the United States to try to roll the levies back and that officials would begin talks with Japan, South Korea and other nations. But ... [Donald] Trump and his advisers have been clear that these entreaties will not stop the next round of tariffs from going into effect just after midnight Wednesday, including another 50 percent duty on China. As a result, tariffs on Chinese goods will be at least 104 percent. In a social media post on Tuesday, Mr. Trump said he had 'a great call' with South Korea’s acting president, Han Duck-soo, about trade and tariffs, and that South Korean officials were heading to the United States for talks. He also expressed optimism that a trade war with China could be averted. 'China also wants to make a deal, badly, but they don’t know how to get it started,' Mr. Trump wrote. 'We are waiting for their call. It will happen!'”

Tyler Pager of the New York Times: “Elon Musk slammed ... [Donald] Trump’s top trade adviser [Peter Navarro] as 'dumber than a sack of bricks' on Tuesday, exposing a remarkable rift in the president’s inner circle over the wide-ranging tariffs that have upended the global economy.... The squabble escalated on Monday when Mr. Navarro said on CNBC that Mr. Musk was not a 'car manufacturer' but a 'car assembler' because Tesla, Mr. Musk’s electric vehicle company, relied on parts from around the world. Mr. Musk fired back on Tuesday, calling Mr. Navarro a 'moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks' in a post on X.... Later in the day, Mr. Musk doubled down, posting that he wanted to 'apologize to bricks.'... He also used a slur to refer to Mr. Navarro, calling him 'Peter Retarrdo.' The feud between Mr. Musk and [Mr.] Navarro, who has been the architect of many of Mr. Trump’s trade plans, has been simmering for days as the administration’s new tariffs have caused huge losses across global financial markets.... Mr. Musk’s words — though aimed at Mr. Navarro — were a rare criticism of Mr. Trump’s policies from one of his most influential advisers. Mr. Musk ... is estimated to have lost roughly $31 billion since Mr. Trump announced sweeping tariffs on foreign countries on April 2....” An NBC News story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: If Navarro is a moron & dumber than a sack of bricks because of the tariff policies he has recommended to Trump, it follows that Trump -- who took the dumb advice -- must be a moron, too.

Rob Copeland, et al., of the New York Times: “Wall Street billionaires are not used to being on the outside looking in. But that is where they find themselves after ... [Donald] Trump ignored their appeals to call off his tariff plans which they fear could endanger the economy. With the backdrop of rapidly mounting stock market losses, corporate titans have worked every angle — phone calls, social media and even a typically staid shareholder letter — to try to change Mr. Trump’s mind. The day after the president announced his most sweeping round of tariffs last week, chief executives from major banks, including Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, had a private meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick organized by a lobbying group in Washington. But Mr. Lutnick was not persuaded to reverse course, three people briefed on the sit-down said. Over the weekend, megadonors to Mr. Trump’s re-election effort tried a different tack, pleading their case in calls to Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, people familiar with the calls said. Those efforts also came up empty. By Monday, hedge fund billionaires — many of whom had been loud and proud boosters of Mr. Trump’s second term — were going public with their cries.”

Aris Folley & Sylvan Lane of the Hill: “Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) expressed deep frustration with ... [Donald] Trump’s tariffs during a Tuesday hearing featuring the top White House trade negotiator. 'Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?' Tillis asked U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer during his appearance before the Senate Finance Committee. Tillis, a critic of tariffs and protectionist policies, questioned whether the Trump administration had a coherent strategy to rebalance trade after announcing roughly $600 billion in new import taxes last week.... Tillis is one of seven Republican senators who signed on to a bill from Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) that would cut back the president’s authority to unilaterally impose tariffs.”

Adam Cancryn & Maya Ward of Politico: “During the first two turbulent months of ... Donald Trump’s term, the White House has shrugged off scrutiny of its most controversial policies with a simple assertion: The American people voted for this. Now, Trump allies and GOP voters spooked by the tariff-induced market crash are beginning to respond en masse: No, we didn’t. Trump won in November because many voters saw him as an antidote to their economic malaise; as a candidate, he frequently promised to lower Americans’ everyday prices. But as president, he has chosen instead to plunge the country into fresh financial chaos, while insisting the market losses as a result of his tariffs are 'medicine' Americans need to take. 'Trump was elected in part to lower inflation and juice the economy,' said GOP pollster Whit Ayres. 'Higher prices and slower growth are exactly the opposite of what Americans voted for.'”

Andrew Duehren of the New York Times: “The Internal Revenue Service has agreed to help homeland security officials find immigrants they are trying to deport, according to court records, committing to sharing information in what would be a fundamental change in how the tax collector uses its tightly regulated records. In a court filing, the Trump administration said that the I.R.S. and Immigration and Customs Enforcement had reached the agreement on Monday and that the two agencies had not yet shared any information. Under the terms of the deal, a partially redacted version of which was submitted in the case, ICE officials can ask the I.R.S. for information about people who have been ordered to leave the United States or whom they are otherwise investigating. Federal law tightly controls taxpayer information, protecting home addresses, earnings and other data from disclosure even to other agencies within the government. I.R.S. officials have for weeks warned that the Trump administration’s plan to use the I.R.S. to help with deportations could be illegal. The top I.R.S. lawyer was demoted as the agreement came together, and was replaced by a former Trump nominee.” The AP report is here.

Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a ruling from a federal judge in California that had ordered the Trump administration to rehire thousands of fired federal workers who had been on probationary status. The court’s brief order said the nonprofit groups that had sued to challenge the dismissals had not suffered the sort of injury that gave them standing to sue. The practical consequences of the ruling may be limited, as another trial judge’s ruling requiring the reinstatement of many of the same workers remains in place. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, but she gave no reasons. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the court should not have ruled on such an important issue in the context of an emergency application. The order was the latest administration victory in the Supreme Court in a case arising from ... [Donald] Trump’s recent blitz of executive orders. Like others, though, it was technical and tentative. The justices said their order would remain in place while the case moved forward.” The AP story is here.

Chicken Supreme Tops the Menu at Johnny's Cafe. Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The court led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. over the last two decades has not been known for its modesty or caution. Its signature move has been bold assertions of power backed by sweeping claims about the meaning of the Constitution.... But as the first wave of challenges to ... [Donald] Trump’s blitz of executive orders has reached the justices, a very different portrait of the court is emerging. It has issued a series of narrow and legalistic rulings that seem calculated to avoid the larger issues presented by a president rapidly working to expand power and reshape government.... The justices’ new approach appears to have multiple goals: to stay out of the political fray, to maintain their legitimacy and, perhaps most important, to avoid a showdown with a president who has relentlessly challenged the legitimacy of the courts.”

Zach Montague of the New York Times: “A federal judge in Washington rejected the White House’s effort to keep The Associated Press from routinely covering ... [Donald] Trump, siding with the wire service and finding that it had faced political retaliation over its editorial decisions.... [The White House had] cited the wire service’s refusal to adopt the administration’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.... The order dealt a blow to Mr. Trump, who, in a departure from decades of tradition, has moved to leverage access to White House events as a way of asserting more direct control over coverage of his administration. The dispute has raised profound questions about the independent news media’s role in shaping public opinion and the lasting implications of the president’s effort to determine how he is portrayed. Judge Trevor N. McFadden of the Federal District Court for the District of Washington wrote in his opinion that the Trump administration must 'immediately rescind their viewpoint-based denial' of The Associated Press from the White House press corps.” The CBS News report is here. MB: Trump appointed McFadden. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Once again, raspberries to all of the White House press corps for failing to support the AP by boycotting the briefing room. Special shout-out to the reporter who asked, as the first question of Trump the Tariff Terrorist on AF1 Sunday, "How was your golf tournament today?" (See Jon Stewart video, embedded Tuesday.)

Rachel Weiner & Ian Duncan of the Washington Post: “Three air traffic control managers with responsibility for Reagan National Airport have been pushed out of their roles in the wake of a violent altercation in the tower, the Federal Aviation Administration confirmed Tuesday. The changes come a week after a supervisor in the tower was arrested and accused of punching another controller in the face over a minor dispute about work, and they follow efforts by the FAA to reduce stress among staff still grappling with January’s catastrophic midair collision of a passenger plane and a military helicopter. The district manager and two assistant managers were offered reassignment elsewhere.”

Jon Stewart tries to understand the theory behind the tariff policy: ~~~

Another Tariffying Day ~~~

~~~~~~~~~~

Paul Krugman: “By now it’s obvious to anyone willing to see — which many people still aren’t — that Donald Trump is, in practice, waging war against American greatness. And the attack is taking place on multiple fronts.... In the long run, and maybe much sooner than that, the dire impacts of tariffs may be matched by the havoc Trumpism is wreaking in other areas.... The demolition of U.S. medical science may be even more damaging than tariffs. We don’t know how many Americans will die prematurely because public health is now being run by a man who rejects medical science, but it’s likely that the number will eventually run into the millions.... We may never know how many lives could have been saved, but won’t be, because of this wholesale assault on science. But the number won’t be small.... [Much of this is about anti-science ideology.] But — as with so many things in this administration — greed and self-dealing are also an important part of the story.... Even if research funding is restored, even if NIH and other agencies try to rebuild, U.S. science will have suffered huge long-term damage. So will the world trading system, which will never be the same even if the Trump tariffs are reversed, and the effectiveness of the federal bureaucracy, which will be impaired for many years even if DOGE’s depredations stop. So much wreckage, achieved in so little time.”

     ~~~ Thanks to RAS for the lead. If you prefer the original, here ya go.

Joe Rennison, et al., of the New York Times: “Wall Street weathered another chaotic day of trading on Monday, with false reports about a potential tariff reprieve briefly sending stocks higher before the White House rebuffed the idea and brought the prospects of a severe economic downturn back to the forefront. The S&P 500 swung from a loss of as much as 4.7 percent, to a gain of as much as 3.4 percent in morning trading, the biggest intraday swing for the S&P 500 since March 2020 and the Covid-19 pandemic. Volatility surged. The CBOE Vix Volatility index, known as Wall Street’s fear gauge, also rose to levels last seen during the pandemic-induced sell-off in March 2020. The S&P 500 ended the day with a drop of 0.2 percent and 17.6 percent below its February peak. The index is on the precipice of a bear market — a rare marker of extreme market pessimism when stocks fall 20 percent from their peak. The overarching concern for investors hasn’t changed. They are worried that steep tariffs imposed by the United States on huge swaths of imports, and the tit-for-tat response from China and other countries, will sink global growth and fuel inflation.” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Fake News Caused a $2 Trillion Market Whiplash. Hadas Gold & Brian Stelter of CNN: “An errant post on X may have just shaken the stock market, showing how influential — and unreliable — the social media platform can be. Unsourced 'headlines' about a potential '90-day pause in tariffs' sent markets into a state of turbulence Monday morning as investors sought any indication of a reprieve from the Trump administration’s new levies. The problem: It wasn’t true. The White House swiftly denied the rumor shortly after it began to circulate online. The false posts may have originated from a real Fox News interview with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett at around 8:30 a.m. ET. Hassett was asked whether ... Donald Trump would 'consider a 90-day pause in tariffs,' and he replied in part: 'The president is (going to) decide what the president is (going to) decide.'” The reporters then go through the ticktock of how X influencers -- and then CNBC anchors -- were claiming Hassert had said Trump was in fact considering a 90-day pause, and how the markets responded to the fake news.

I said we’re going to try and get groceries down right? An old-fashioned term, but a beautiful term. Eggs. Because prices got so high people couldn’t live. I mean, the prices for groceries, the prices for standard, standard groceries, standard things were going through the roof. They couldn’t live. And now those prices are coming down, so call them groceries. -- Donald Trump, responding to a question about tariffs Monday ~~~

~~~ S.V. Date of the Huffington Post: “... Donald Trump offered no reassuring words Monday and instead provided yet more evidence that he understands little to nothing about international trade, but is nevertheless convinced that he does. From claiming that the European Union was created specifically to 'screw' the United States to conflating trade deficits with domestic budget deficits to, yet again, misstating how tariffs are applied and on whom, Trump made clear to anyone watching his Oval Office question-and-answer session that he has no intention of ending or even pausing the turmoil he has set off.... [University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers said that the financial markets' responseto Trump's tariffs is a result of] 'the fear that this is a White House run by a muddled old man, who hasn’t appointed any grownups in the room, and who won’t listen to outside advice. The way these tariffs were set up is absurd and reveals there’s no rhyme or reason to what he’s doing.'... 'Trump believes that the only thing that causes trade deficits is other countries stealing from America. Nobody seems able to persuade him otherwise,' said Avik Roy, a former top policy adviser to ... Mitt Romney.”

Megan Messerly & Sam Sutton of Politico: “Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flew to Florida Sunday to encourage ... Donald Trump to focus his message on negotiating favorable trade deals — or risk the stock market cratering further, according to two people familiar with the conversations, granted anonymity to share details of them. Bessent, who landed with the president at the White House on Marine One Sunday night, told Trump that markets would remain in peril unless he started putting more emphasis on talking about his endgame with tariffs — winning deals with other countries.... Even as the Treasury secretary has confined his advice to messaging, it appears to be moving Trump to allow more room publicly for negotiations — including the possibility of cutting back on some of the aggressive international trade barriers he announced last week.... Bessent’s advice appears to have encouraged Trump to tamp down his most absolutist statements and formally open the door for negotiations with some countries.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: As I read this article, I was reminded of Thomas Cromwell, Henry VIII's long-time advisor, who -- if the PBS series "Wolf Hall" is somewhat accurate -- used flattery and gentle coaxing to influence Henry, just as Bessent does Trump. The PBS series hasn't run its course in the U.S. yet, but I suspect we will eventually learn that Cromwell's clever cajolery had its limits: despite his years of service and despite being a favorite of Henry's during that time, Henry had Cromwell beheaded in 1540. Good luck, Scotty!

Paul Blumenthal of the Huffington Post: “... Donald Trump and his economic team justified last week’s sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs with multiple conflicting explanations that, when considered together, make no sense at all. The administration wants the public to believe three different things, all of which are in tension. First, Trump’s tariffs are designed to launch a renaissance for American manufacturing replaced by overseas imports, bringing back long lost working class jobs.... Second, that the tariffs are meant to raise massive amounts of revenue to replace the progressive income tax. And third, Trump’s advisers and various online sycophants also claim that the purpose is to use the tariffs as pressure on foreign nations to cut bilateral trade deals with the U.S.... Each [of these goals] is in conflict with the other. It can either be one thing or the other thing, but not all three things or even two out of three.” MB: This is currently (8:00 am ET Tuesday) the banner headline at the HuffPost, but it is something Krugman explained (with little fanfare) last week (first linked here April 2).

David Lynch of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump faces a major obstacle in trying to transform the U.S. economy into a self-reliant colossus: himself.... Trump’s use of unilateral presidential authority, rather than congressional legislation, to enact new import taxes, his contradictory policies, and his history of changing course may discourage business executives from even starting.... Clouding the outlook is profound uncertainty about the president’s policies. Within hours of each other, different cabinet secretaries have provided warring guidance over Trump’s tariff plans.... [Trump's] abrupt announcement of major shifts in long-standing U.S. international economic policies, meanwhile, have left many in the business community wondering about what else might change.”

Elizabeth Dwoskin, et al., of the Washington Post: “Over the weekend, as Elon Musk launched into a barrage of social media posts criticizing [Peter Navarro,] one of the lead White House advisers for ... Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff plan, Musk was ... making personal appeals to Trump. The attempted intervention, confirmed by two people familiar with the matter..., has not brought success so far.... Musk’s break with Trump over a signature administration priority marks the highest-profile disagreement between the president and one of his key advisers.... Musk has also disagreed with other members of Trump’s coalition on issues such as H1-B visas for skilled immigrants and on DOGE’s approach to government spending.” ~~~

~~~ Cat Zakrzewski, et al., of the Washington Post: “Trump’s tariffs are increasingly alienating some of the corporate titans, influencers and even Republican lawmakers who served as his boosters, as the president plows ahead with a trade strategy that has prompted wild swings in the markets. The criticism is an early sign that the economic turmoil caused by his trade war could leave lasting political scars for Trump, who doubled down on the strategy by threatening new tariffs against China on Monday morning. The chiding marks a departure from the general acquiescence among Trump’s allies during the first 2½ months of his shock-and-awe presidency.... The cracks in Trump’s clout were most visible in corporate America, as the executives who once touted Trump’s policies as good for business raced to measure the impact of the tariffs on their portfolios and supply chains.” ~~~

~~~ A Downside to Bullying. Josh Barro: "Trump’s efforts to squelch dissent have been very intentional, and on a lot of fronts, I’m sure he’s happy about the results — like with the law firms and the universities he has brought to heel. But he’s likely to regret shutting up the corporate leaders — the honest feedback that he’s discouraged them from providing is feedback that might have saved him from a political disaster. The thing about the increasing meekness of the corporate executive class is that it reflects their singular focus on making profits for their companies — why risk offending the president if he’ll retaliate in a way that hurts the bottom line? But that same singular focus on profits also means that corporations will need to react to the tariffs in ways that will gravely hurt Trump's political fortunes. We may not hear an outspoken CEO on television criticizing Trump for killing jobs, driving up prices, and making it difficult to do business in America. But that CEO will still react to the economic cost of the tariffs in the normal way: by cutting jobs, raising prices, and seeking business opportunities outside of America." ~~~ 

~~~ Some Serious Trumpy Remorse. Robert Tait of the Guardian: “A libertarian group that has been funded by Leonard Leo and Charles Koch has mounted a legal challenge against Donald Trump’s tariff regime, in a sign of spreading rightwing opposition to a policy that has sent international markets plummeting. The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed a suit against Trump’s imposition of import tariffs on exports from China, arguing that doing so under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) – which the president has invoked to justify the duties on nearly all countries – is unlawful. The group’s actions echo support given by four Republican senators last week for a Democratic amendment calling for the reversal of 25% tariffs imposed on Canada.... The action from the alliance has the potential to be even more emblematic, given its past backing from Koch, a billionaire industrialist, and Leo, a wealthy legal activist who advised Trump on the nomination of three conservative supreme court justices during his first presidency, which has given the court a 6-3 rightwing majority.”

~~~ Washington Post Editors: “... Donald Trump is freezing the U.S. economy, intentionally or not, and the damage worsens with every day he stays his course.... Without congressional approval (something the Constitution requires), Trump is imposing the highest U.S. taxes on trade since 1909 — effectively the largest U.S. tax increase since 1968.... What happens in the next few days will decide how deep a now-seemingly-inevitable recession will become in the U.S. and beyond.... Meanwhile, businesses will stall big investment decisions until they have an idea of where tariffs will be in the days, weeks and months ahead.... Small businesses, unable to absorb cost increases or push for price concessions from suppliers, might start to default. And the tariffs threaten to disrupt complex supply chains, leading to potential shortages. In a frozen economy, companies feel compelled to lay off workers, because this is the cost they can most easily control. Unemployment stands to rise. Joblessness will, in turn, weaken consumer confidence.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: This is certainly a Bezos-approved editorial. (“We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,” Bezos announced in February [WashPo link].) King Donald will not appreciate (or listen to) Jeff's kibitzing. ~~~

~~~ Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times: “After Trump’s victory in November, Peter Berezin, chief global strategist at BCA Research..., estimated that the chance of a recession had climbed to 75 percent. 'The prospect of an escalation of the trade war is likely to depress corporate investment while lowering real household disposable income,' said a BCA report. The surprising thing isn’t that Berezin saw the Trump tariff crisis coming, but that so many of his peers didn’t.... [Why?] People in finance, said Berezin, are more likely to be punished for being too cautious and pessimistic than for being too hopeful and aggressive.... Some investors also felt a cultural affinity with the new administration that further clouded their judgment. [That is, they hate 'wokeness.']” (Also linked yesterday.)

Justin Jounvenal & Ann Marimow of the Washington Post: “The Supreme Court on Monday removed a temporary block on the Trump administration’s use of a controversial wartime authority to deport alleged members of a Venezuelan gang, ruling the five immigants who challenged the policy did so in the wrong court. 'The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia,' the justices wrote of the challenge in U.S. District Court in D.C. 'As a result, the Government is likely to succeed on the merits of this action.' The 5-4 ruling did not touch on the underlying legal questions of the challenge. It leaves open the possibility the migrants could refile their case in Texas or other jurisdictions where they are detained. But for now, it opens the door for the Trump administration to deport more Venezuelan migrants under the act, although it also said the government must give prospective deportees notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal. And it appears to take the central legal issues of the case away from U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, whose temporary restraining order blocking the deportations prompted impeachment calls from Trump and his allies. The court’s three liberal justices dissented, joined in part by Justice Amy Coney Barrett....

“The ACLU called the justices’ ruling that migrants are entitled to challenge the government’s claim that they are gang members 'a huge victory.' 'We are disappointed that we will need to start the court process over again in a different venue but the critical point is that the Supreme Court said individuals must be given due process to challenge their removal under the Alien Enemies Act,' lead ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said in a statement.” Thanks to Ken W. for the link. (Also linked yesterday.) The AP's report is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Notwithstanding the ACLU's brave face, now would be a good time to check out yesterday's Comments and read Akhilleus' recitation on James Madison's & Montesquieu's opinions on all that. Madison, citing Montesquieu, wrote in Federalist No. 47, "‘Were the power of judging ... joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with all the violence of an oppressor.’” Ain't it something that Madison foresaw the predilections of the Great Oppressor AND the Supreme Boys way back 237 years ago, and Montesquieu saw them coming 40 years before that. It does seem that plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. ~~~

~~~ AND There's This. Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Monday temporarily blocked a trial judge’s order directing the United States to return a Salvadoran migrant it had inadvertently deported. The chief justice, acting on his own, issued an 'administrative stay,' an interim measure meant to give the justices some breathing room while the full court considers the matter. The order came just hours after the administration asked the court to block the trial judge’s order instructing the government to return the migrant, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, by 11:59 p.m. on Monday. Judge Paula Xinis of the Federal District Court in Maryland had said the administration committed a 'grievous error' that 'shocks the conscience' by sending Mr. Abrego Garcia, to a notorious prison in El Salvador last month.” (Also linked yesterday.) The AP's report is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Well, it seems there are consciences and consciences. Looks as if CJ Johnnie's conscience is not easily shocked. Apply Montesquieu Rule here.

David Badash of the New Civil Rights Movement: “A former U.S. Department of Justice pardon attorney delivered sworn testimony before Congress on Monday, accusing her former agency ... of 'corruption and abuse of power.' She claimed that armed U.S. Marshals were sent to her home to deliver what she described as a 'warning' from the DOJ, cautioning her about the risks of testifying. Liz Oyer 'told U.S. media outlets that her firing came shortly after she declined to recommend restoring gun rights to actor Mel Gibson, a supporter of ... Donald Trump,' Reuters reports. She reportedly was fired by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche [-- formerly one of Trump's personal attorneys --] on March 7.... 'At no point did Mr. Blanche’s staff pick up the phone and call me before they sent armed deputies to my home,' she said in her testimony. 'The letter was a warning to me about the risks of testifying here today. But I am here because I will not be bullied into concealing the ongoing corruption and abuse of power at the Department of Justice.'” The AP's story is here.

Helene Cooper of the New York Times: “The Trump administration fired Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield, U.S. officials said on Monday, as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth continued his purge of military leaders who have been targeted by conservatives. Admiral Chatfield, who served in the Navy as the U.S. representative to NATO’s military committee, has joined a list of female leaders and people of color who have been fired.... In a December letter to Mr. Hegseth, a conservative watchdog group included Admiral Chatfield in a list of 'woke ideologues' who the group said should be purged. Before moving to NATO, Admiral Chatfield was the first woman to lead the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, R.I.”

Worst. Client. Ever. Devlin Barrett & Glenn Thrush of the New York Times: Department of Justice “litigators, their ranks increasingly depleted, often find themselves in court with few facts to defend policies they cannot explain, according to current and former officials. Career lawyers representing the government have a long tradition of arguing for the goals of Republican or Democratic administrations, regardless of their personal views. What is different now ... is that they increasingly feel trapped between ... [Donald] Trump’s partisan political appointees, who insist on a maximalist approach, and judges who demand comprehensible answers to basic questions. The most vivid example of this squeeze came on Saturday when one of the department’s senior immigration lawyers, Erez Reuveni, was suspended indefinitely after speaking candidly about the administration’s mistaken deportation of a Maryland man to a notorious megaprison in El Salvador.... A second senior immigration lawyer involved in the Abrego Garcia case, August Flentje, was also placed on administrative leave for his failure 'to supervise a subordinate.'... 'Justice Department attorneys are being put in an impossible position: Obey the president, or uphold their ethical duty to the court and the Constitution, said Stacey Young, a former department lawyer....”

Vimal Patel, et al., of the New York Times: “More than 200 international students were abruptly stripped of their ability to stay in the United States in recent days, according to universities and media reports, sowing fear among students and confusion at schools scrambling to help students facing detention and possible deportation. The moves targeted students at a wide range of universities, from private institutions like Harvard and Stanford to public ones like the University of Texas at Austin and Minnesota State University-Mankato. The University of California had dozens of cases reported across its campuses.... In some cases, immigration officers have arrested international students related to their involvement in pro-Palestinian causes. In other cases, students had committed legal infractions, such as driving over the speed limit or while intoxicated, often years ago, several immigration lawyers said in interviews. But lawyers said the Trump administration had often given no reason at all, leaving them to guess why students were targeted.”

Emily Nunn of the New York Times: “Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. kicked off a tour through southwestern states on Monday by calling on states to ban fluoride in drinking water supplies, a move that would reverse what some medical experts consider one of the most important public health practices in the country’s history. The announcement came at a news conference in Utah, the first state to enact such a ban into law. The state’s new law is set to take effect in early May, despite concerns from public health experts who consider fluoridation of water core to preventing tooth decay.... The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which Mr. Kennedy oversees as health secretary, has listed fluoridation as one of the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century. After the news conference, Stefanie Spear, Mr. Kennedy’s principal deputy chief of staff, said Mr. Kennedy would direct the C.D.C.’s community preventative services task force to study fluoride and make a new recommendation.” The ABC News story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I realize that no administration in U.S. history has been less interested in truth in advertising, but I do think that for the duration, Mr. Kennedy's title should be Secretary of Sickness & Human Suffering.

That Was Quick. Kelly Cho of the Washington Post: “The U.S. National Park Service on Monday appeared to restore its original webpage on the history of the Underground Railroad after it was met with backlash for deleting a prominently featured photo of abolitionist and women’s suffragist Harriet Tubman, as well as segments of text describing the horrors of slavery. The changes, first reported by The Washington Post on Sunday, came after ... Donald Trump issued an executive order late last month directing the Smithsonian Institution to eliminate 'divisive narratives' — a move that spurred fears that his administration aimed to whitewash American history.... However, some of the other changes to webpages reported by The Post still appear to be in place.... In a statement to CNN, a spokesperson for the NPS said: 'Changes to the Underground Railroad page on the National Park Service’s website were made without approval from NPS leadership nor Department leadership. The webpage was immediately restored to its original content.'”

You look at people who are 150 years old who are fraudulently collecting Social Security payments. You see our Social Security system — 40 percent of the people who are calling are actually committing fraud. That means the 60 percent who need their Social Security checks are waiting in line. Vice President JD Vance, during an interview on Fox & Friends, April 3

... that is an absurdity on its face.... Only 0.00625 percent of Social Security benefits are lost to direct-deposit fraud, with 0.0025 percent (40 percent) via Social Security’s 800 number. There’s a monumental difference between 40 percent and 0.0025 percent. But in the Trump administration’s scramble to serve up outrage and scandal about alleged fraud at Social Security, Vance went on national television and told a whopper. -- Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post 

Blueprint for Crippling Universities. Susan Svrluga & Danielle Douglas-Gabriel of the Washington Post: “Critical of college admissions, diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and campus protests that he lambasted as pro-Hamas, Max Eden, then a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote an outline that presaged what was to come in the new Trump administration. He singled out Columbia [University] as the top target. 'To scare universities straight,” Eden wrote in the Washington Examiner [published December 6, 2024], Education Secretary Linda McMahon 'should start by taking a prize scalp. She should simply destroy Columbia University.' Eden ... suggested canceling research grants and deporting international students who took part in protests. Though it’s unclear whether his plan had a direct impact, it bears a striking resemblance to the early actions the Trump administration has taken to transform America’s most prestigious colleges and universities.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Complaining about dissent at universities is probably the stupidest, most ignorant criticism of formal education in Western thought. The purpose of universities is to teach critical thinking (and not only in the humanities). That's what underlies the principles of academic freedom and tenure. (Akhilleus wrote a couple of days ago, "Perhaps the most important observation Socrates made was that the unexamined life is not worth living, in other words..., accepting without question the diktats of those in charge and the superstitions of everyone else was a wasteful and sorry way to live.... [Socrates'] message was a great gift he was giving to his fellow Athenians. They, in turn, gave him a cup of hemlock and told him to drop dead." Which he did. And that's why, when European universities started up in the Middle Ages, hemlock was not on the cafeteria menu. Even more basically, rebellion against the status quo is a natural, biological rite of passage. It's what young people do. University protests provide an important, relatively safe and socially-approved outlet for that inevitable rebellious expression. To suppress it is dangerous. Are protesters shouting and carrying signs always engaging in higher critical thinking? Well, of course not. But the one leads to, moderates and complements the other.

Kelsey Ables of the Washington Post: “The National Weather Service has halted its automated language translation services until further notice, potentially hindering the millions of U.S. residents who speak a language other than English from accessing life-saving information at a time when climate change is exacerbating extreme weather events, experts say. The pause was 'due to a contract lapse' with an artificial intelligence firm providing the translation services, according to a message from the agency this month.... [The translation facility] may be at odds with the Trump administration’s policy approach. It has declared English the official language of the United States — revoking a Clinton-era order that required federal agencies to provide assistance for those with limited English ability.”

Reid Epstein of the New York Times: “Michael R. Bloomberg’s gun control group plans to spend $10 million to help elect Democratic attorneys general this year and in 2026, an investment it says is meant to help protect the rule of law and democracy while ... [Donald] Trump holds the White House. The group, Everytown for Gun Safety, will back Democratic candidates in 10 competitive states, including Virginia this fall and Arizona, Georgia, Minnesota, Nevada and Wisconsin, among others, next year, according to John Feinblatt, the organization’s president.”

~~~~~~~~~~

You Have the Right to an Attorney. Except in Rural Texas. Jolie McCullough of the New York Times: “The right to a criminal defense lawyer is so ingrained in the American idea of justice that fans of TV police dramas can recite these two lines from the Miranda rights by memory: You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. But in much of Texas, that right is routinely denied. Every year, more than half of rural Texans accused of misdemeanors are left to represent themselves — five times the rate of defendants in urban areas.... The New York Times reported last week that the court system in Maverick County, Texas, had repeatedly incarcerated people accused of minor crimes for months without filing charges, and seemingly lost track of some of the defendants in jail. The county rarely provided misdemeanor defendants with lawyers, who might have prevented those lapses.... Geoff Burkhart, the [Texas Indigent Defense C]ommission’s former executive director, said in an interview that some commission members, who he would not name, had privately questioned whether misdemeanor defendants needed attorneys at all.”

Wisconsin. One Small Victory for the Rule of Law. Patrick Marley of the Washington Post: “A former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice agreed Monday to give up his law license for three years after facing a string of ethics allegations stemming from his error-riddled review of the 2020 election for Republican state lawmakers. In a filing with the state Supreme Court, former justice Michael Gableman conceded that legal regulators had produced enough evidence to find he had violated state ethics rules for lawyers. He gave up his legal fight over the matter a week after a candidate backed by Democrats won a seat on the state’s high court and locked in a likely liberal majority for years. In a 10-count complaint in November, Wisconsin’s Office of Lawyer Regulation alleged Gableman had filed false information with a judge, repeatedly engaged in dishonesty, unfairly disparaged a judge and an attorney, failed to perform competent legal work, did not follow the directions of his client, released confidential information and lied to the lawyer who investigated him.... The state Supreme Court will have the final say on whether to suspend his license.” The AP story is here.