The Washington Post offers tips on how to keep your EV battery running in frigid temperatures. The link at the end of this graf is supposed to be a "gift link" (from me, Marie Burns, the giftor!), meaning that non-subscribers can read the article. Hope it works: https://wapo.st/3u8Z705
Comment "Approval"
My site host Squarespace has a new forced feature which automatically throws some comments into an "awaiting approval" bin. I have no facility to disable this feature (actually, it IS disabled, but Squarespace has installed an override). I have asked Squarespace to change this. I don't think they will.
This is an equal-opportunity site, and I don't bar anyone from commenting. I apologize for this annoying, discriminatory "feature." I will "approve" comments as soon as I'm aware of them and before reading them. With the exception of some ad spam, I can count on one hand the number of comments I've had to remove in the past six months for offensive content. This approval system is a real pain for commenters, readers and me.
I do, BTW, read all the comments, though not necessarily timely. If I ever remove a comment for what I deem cause, the writer will know it & know why.
Update: a commenter has suggested that "the best solution is just not to comment." That's was not my goal in making readers & contributors aware of the approval process imposed by my host. Since I'm not going to read the comments as I "approve" them, it takes me only seconds to release the comments for publication. The delay is what is unfair to commenters: I don't sit at my computer waiting for comments to come in, so any comments that trigger the approval algorithm will be delayed, sometimes by hours if I'm not around. This delay severely limits commenters' ability to engage in an exchange of ideas, which is one of the purposes of the comments facility. Not only that, I think the approval process itself is insulting to contributors, who 999 times out of 1,000, write comments which falls within my so-called standards.
So keep on commenting, please. What annoys me is the approval requirement, not the comments.
Reader Comments (5)
As I was reading off all the stuff on Reality Chex this morning, my husband said, "Wow. What would we do without Marie?"
So I hope you get to read this before it's dumped. Every day starts with Reality Chex here at Casa de Duxbury. :)
Interesting. So one does NOT have a control of his 'won' website. It is practically impossible to handle (read) all comments at a timely fashion. It costs the real New York Times a lot of money, I guess.
Well, the best solution is just NOT to comment.
The Duhigg and Bradsher piece was disturbing in its specificity. Most of us, I imagine, were well aware of the working conditions in China, but this piece fleshed it out and one feels sick knowing all the details. I teared reading about the poor mother who had to view her burned son, was afraid to touch him, and failed to understand how this could have happened. Some of the comments following the article blamed consumers; while that has merit, it does not address the greed and ineptitude that prevails in these companies. The fact that Mitch Daniels cited Steve Jobs in his speech as someone to emulate is ironic and moronic. And so it goes~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So it goes. It did not have to be like this. A timid government yielded to the big international companies when negotiating trade agreements, We took no advantage of the importance of the American market and just rolled over and said do me. And they did.
An example of what we could have done is Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart dictates what their cost will be, where the product
will be made, how it will be marked and what the pallet pattern and height will be. They are the huge market.
Being in the huge American market was so important to other countries that we could have demanded compete acceptance of American products in return. Korea and Japan still keep out many American products. We could have charged a import fee to protect Americn jobs and defray costs of educating or relocating American workers.
Since the foreign suppliers shipped a lot and imported little, they could not retaliate. And to get a foot hold in the world's largest market they would have acccepted anything, had we asked.
All of the foreign countries were tough negotitors, we were weak and have had our lunch eaten while big American companies cheered and even directed our defeat to make things cheaper and easier for themselves.
We could have had our own elecronics cluster, with clean air and no child labor and no poisoning of employees. The damage to America caused by out sourcing far exceeds the benefits. Benefits going to a small percentage of Americans.
I really miss you on the NYT website. You and Karen Garcia.Their present commentariat is pitiful
It's taking me a while to get accustomed to this website