The Commentariat -- August 31, 2012
Catherine Rampell of the New York Times: "While a majority of jobs lost during the downturn were in the middle range of wages, a majority of those added during the recovery have been low paying, according to a new report from the National Employment Law Project. The disappearance of midwage, midskill jobs is part of a longer-term trend that some refer to as a hollowing out of the work force, though it has probably been accelerated by government layoffs." CW: this is exactly the kind of trend a Romney presidency -- would exacerbate. From quashing unions to defunding education to whacking the social safety net to encouraging outsourcing to cutting government to just plain disrespecting the ordinary American (or what David Firestone calls "contempt for the mainstream"), gutting the middle & upper-middle economic class is almost the bedrock of the Romney/Ryan plot.
Corey Robin makes the argument, based on historical analysis, that Democrats, not Republicans, are the real austerity/deficit hawk party. Via Digby, whose commentary is on point.
John Cassidy in Fortune: President Obama's biggest economic mistake was retaining Ben Bernanke as Fed chair. Bernanke, a Republican, did a pretty good job for a Republican president, but "Bernanke's performance since 2009 has been less impressive, and this year it's been pretty awful." Oh, why did he do it? -- he took Tim Geithner's advice. CW: frankly, I think hiring Timmy was Obama's biggest mistake. Thanks to my husband for suggesting I link this post.
Rebecca Robbins of the Harvard Crimson: "Harvard College's disciplinary board is investigating nearly half of the 279 students who enrolled in Government 1310: 'Introduction to Congress' last spring for allegedly plagiarizing answers or inappropriately collaborating on the class' final take-home exam." CW: what more appropriate place for "nearly half" of the students to cheat than in a class about an institution where "nearly half" of the members are crooks & liars?
Priest Takes "Blaming the Victim" to a New Low. Colleen Curry of ABC News: The Rev. Benedict Groeschel, "a well-known Catholic priest who hosts a weekly religious television show, said in an interview this week that child sex abusers are often seduced by teenage boys and should not go to jail on a first offense.... He also referred to convicted pedophile Jerry Sandusky as a 'poor guy.' ... The comments were removed by the website that published them and replaced by an apology from the priest and the site's editors."
Presidential Race
Steve Holland of Reuters: "Mitt Romney has moved into a narrow lead over U.S. President Barack Obama in a small bounce for him from the Republican National Convention, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found on Thursday. Romney entered the week four points behind Obama.... But the most recent daily rolling poll gave Romney a two-point lead...." CW: this is worrisome only if Romney's lead holds after the Democratic convention next week.
Jackie Calmes of the New York Times has a chat with David Axelrod: "Top [Obama] advisers said they would seek to make the Republican candidates' statements into a larger issue of character, one that they hoped would reinforce Mr. Romney's image among many voters as a shape-shifting politician who has reversed position on abortion and gay rights, gun control and other issues -- as his Republican rivals complained throughout their long nomination battle.
Nice to see this headline on the front page of the New York Times: "Facts Take a Beating in Acceptance Speeches." In an article originally headlined "Ryan's Speech Contained a Litany of Falsehoods," Michael Cooper lists some of the lies Ryan &, incidentally, his running mate, told in their speeches. Unfortunately, Cooper felt compelled to prominently feature a couple of "both sides do it" grafs, which is the journalistic gold standard these days. ...
... Rosalind Helderman has a better & more balanced piece, appearing on the front page of the Washington Post, on fact-checkers. Here's the lede: "Did Paul Ryan bend the truth? The verdict, rendered by a slew of media fact checkers, was immediate and unequivocal: In his first major speech before the American people, the Republican vice presidential nominee repeatedly left out key facts, ignored context and was blind to his own hypocrisy."
This Is News Analysis: Chuck Todd of NBC News says Democrats wish they had as many non-white leaders as Republicans have. Via Josh Marshall of TPM in a post titled, "Okay, That's the Stupidest Thing I Ever Heard":
In case you missed it, the "Daily Show" obtained a copy of the moving Romney bio-op that aired during the GOP convention. Very touching:
A beginning, a muddle and an end. -- Ezra Klein, describing Romney's speech
Jeff Zeleny of the New York Times: "Mitt Romney accepted the Republican presidential nomination on Thursday by making a direct appeal to Americans who were captivated by President Obama's hopeful promises of change, pledging that he could deliver what the president did not and move the country from its worst economic downturn since the Great Depression." ...
... Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post fact-checks Romney's speech. Apparently the part about his loving his family is true.
... New York Times Editors: "Mitt Romney wrapped the most important speech of his life, for Thursday night's session of his convention, around an extraordinary reinvention of history -- that his party rallied behind President Obama when he won in 2008, hoping that he would succeed.... The truth, rarely heard this week in Tampa, Fla., is that the Republicans charted a course of denial and obstruction from the day Mr. Obama was inaugurated, determined to deny him a second term by denying him any achievement, no matter the cost to the economy or American security.... [On foreign policy,] apart from outsourcing his policy to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on settlements, it's not clear what Mr. Romney would do differently. But after watching the Republicans for three days in Florida, that comes as no surprise." ...
... David Firestone of the New York Times: Romney's "disappointment" in Obama was phony. ...
... Tim Egan: "The empty chair that a befuddled Clint Eastwood spoke to had to compete with the famous empty suit of Mitt Romney.... A man whose father walked out on the Barry Goldwater convention of 1964 because it was too extreme let the heirs to those toxic politics write a platform that would move the country backward by two generations." ...
... In a post titled, "Mitt Romney -- More Effective than Clint Eastwood," Jonathan Chait of New York magazine writes, "Romney attempted to disarm [the difficulties Obama faced in 2009] by acknowledging the bad hand, but implying Republicans wished Obama well. The GOP as a whole 'wanted Obama to succeed,' he said, adding that he personally shared this wish, making Obama's failure to eradicate the impact of the crisis entirely his own fault. In reality, Republicans planned from before Obama took office to withhold cooperation and thus regain their majority, and Romney himself was obviously running to defeat Obama the entire period." ...
He took office without the basic qualification that most Americans have and one that was essential to his task. He had almost no experience working in a business. Jobs to him are about government. -- Mitt Romney, explaining in his convention speech why Obama has failed
But if business experience is the key qualification for a president, why did Romney pick Paul Ryan, who has spent even less time in the private sector than Obama, to be his vice president? -- Ezra Klein (Klein's whole post, which covers several aspects of Romney's speech, is worth a read.) ...
... Steve Benen: "... last night, I kept waiting for something, anything, that resembled substance, but it never came. About the closest thing Romney came to a meaningful policy idea was his stated goal of using public funds to subsidize private school tuition. That's a horrible idea, but I'll concede it at least counts as an idea.... Once again, the Romney campaign message boiled down to: President Obama hasn't done enough; I'll do more; just trust me.... But therein lies the rub: Romney hasn't given Americans any reason to trust him." ...
... CW: I swear Mitt Romney is looking more and more like Richard Nixon. By November you won't be able to tell which is which. I muted the sound during his speech, so if he said, "I am not a crook," or "My wife wears a good Republican cloth coat," or "Checkers loves riding on the hood of the car," I totally missed it. ...
... While Nixon Rmoney was speaking, I read Michael Shear's interview of President Obama. That was kinda depressing, too. ...
... I see David Dayen of Firedoglake agrees with me.
Elizabeth Williamson of the Wall Street Journal: "Hollywood actor and director Clint Eastwood, the Republican National Convention's much-touted surprise guest, delivered a rambling, awkward speech that was the highly orchestrated evening's first off-script moment." Includes video.
... CBS News has the full transcript of Eastwood's speech.
Bonus Quote. Referring all questions on this to Salvador Dali. -- Ben LaBolt, Obama campaign spokesperson, on Eastwood's speech
... "Disaster." Kevin Cirilli of Politico: MSNBC, Fox "News" analysts react -- or not -- to Eastwood's speech.
CW: There's a big shebang going on up the road in Tampa. I was going to try to watch a bit of it, & I did -- about 17 seconds was all I could stand. For all I know, I was invited to attend: this afternoon a fellow named Mitt Romney robo-called me. At least I think it was a robo-call. Hard to tell with Mitt. Don't know what he had to say as I hung up after, "Hi, I'm Mitt Romney." Hope I hurt his robo-feelings.
Quote of the Day: Just because someone tells you different facts than you remember from when you were there watching the event happen doesn't mean that he is lying. It may just mean that he is trying to be elected to something. Besides, there is literal truth and story truth and narrative truth and speech truth, and, of the four, literal truth most seldom gets invited to parties. Conversation as we know it would end. Politics consists of assembling a convincing story about events out of the facts at your disposal and seeing how many people prefer your story to your opponent's. We all start with the same fabric of fact, but a lot of art goes into the draping. There are lies, damned lies, statistics and Things Your Opponent Did to Grandma. -- Marc Theissen of the Washington Post, defending Paul Ryan's dishonest convention speech, or what Charles Pierce calls "for the most singularly stupid piece of writing [the Post] likely ever will publish, even if it renews Marc Thiessen's contract for the next 20 years.
Steve Kornacki of Salon: "A compelling, fact-based defense of the content of Paul Ryan's vice-presidential acceptance speech last night is impossible. The deception was so flagrant, so thorough, so sloppy and so unending that, as one observer on Twitter put it, Politifact probably melted down.... Most casual voters don't read editorials and fact-checker columns and probably don't get much beyond the headline, picture and (maybe) first paragraph or two of a news story about a speech like Ryan's. The Romney campaign is clearly counting on this." ...
... Ditto from Dan Amira of New York: "Ryan's pants are on fire, but all America saw was a barn-burner." ...
... "Fact-Checkers Are No Match for Romney & Ryan." Paul Waldman of American Prospect: "Romney and Ryan are obviously engaging in some simple cost-benefit analysis.... There are some other conditions that could raise the costs -- let's say if Paul Ryan had a Palinesque on-camera humiliation, in which an interviewer confronted him with his Janesville auto plant absurdity and forced him to explain himself. If that happened, afterward he might be afraid to bring it up again, lest everyone replay that interview." CW: Don't hold your breath till that happens. ...
... Zack Beauchamp of Think Progress notes that even when reporters call out lies, they use euphemisms: "factual shortcuts," "perceived inaccuracies," "questionable claims," etc. Beauchamp calls out specific reports.
... Paul Krugman is more optimistic: "It's starting to look ... as if the life cycle of the Ryan myth is proving a lot shorter than the [George W.] Bush version. Even people who were fanatical Bush defenders and Krugman-haters seem to have had enough of Ryan's shtick, thanks to the most dishonest convention speech ever. And I think this matters. Ryan's true constituency isn't the Tea Party, it's the commentariat; strip him of his unjustified reputation as an honest policy wonk, and he's just another mean-spirited ideologue. Indeed, his character may itself become an election issue." ...
Krugman: "... many people are wondering why Ryan keeps using the closed Janesville GM plant to illustrate the failure of Obama's policy -- when the plant actually closed under George W. Bush.... [Maybe] he's branched out from Ayn Rand, and is now also listening to this guy:
... In his column today, Krugman writes, "Paul Ryan's speech Wednesday night may have accomplished one good thing: It finally may have dispelled the myth that he is a Serious, Honest Conservative." The Romney-Ryan "Vouchercare" plan "would mean higher costs and lower benefits for seniors." ...
... BUT what if facts don't matter? Philosopher Jason Stanley analyzes the assumptions & rationale behind the blatant Romney/Ryan campaign lying machine. ...
... CW: Stanley may have exaggerated the public's low expectations of political candidates, but he's surely on the right track. The dogwhistle appeals to racists work because they reassure racists that Romney & Ryan "get it" and are on their side. There is more than racism at work here, tho. Some time back David Brooks misused a study about attitudes toward the minimum wage. When I read the actual study results, instead of relying on Brooks' distorted gloss, what I learned was that people earning just above the minimum wage were opposed to raising it. This isn't about racism per se; it's about people not wanting to be at the bottom of the ladder, which is indeed one of the motivations to racism -- if we deserving white people can keep minorities down, we'll never be the bottom rung. Racism in this sense is not the cause but the effect of status anxiety. ...
... AND the Best Little Fact-Checker of Them All. Seriously:
... BUT Stephen Colbert defends the "big ideas" in Paul Ryan's speech -- like "Lying Is Handy":
News Ledes
Washington Post: "A federal judge ruled Friday that Ohio must allow in-person voting on the weekend before the presidential election, a victory for Democrats who claimed Republican efforts to close down early voting were aimed at discouraging voters most likely to support President Obama.... Ohio has allowed in-person voting the weekend before the election since 2005, and U.S. District Judge Peter C. Economus said Friday that the state did not offer a convincing argument as to why it was changing the rules now."
New York Times: "The Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, delivered on Friday a detailed and forceful argument for new steps to stimulate the economy, reinforcing earlier indications that the Fed is on the verge of action.... Mr. Bernanke did not announce any new steps in his speech, delivered before an annual monetary policy conference.... Nor did he offer a timetable, although many analysts expect the Fed to act at the next meeting of its policy-making committee on Sept. 12 and 13."
AP: "Isaac crawled into the nation's midsection early Friday, leaving a soggy mess in Louisiana. Neighborhoods were underwater, and many homes that stayed dry didn't have lights, air conditioning or clean water. It will be a few days before the soupy brown water recedes and people forced out of flooded neighborhoods can return home."
AP: "Under pressure from a U.N. nuclear agency probe, Iran is urging member countries to revamp the [International Atomic Energy] Agency in a way that would dilute the power of nations that fear it may be trying to make atomic arms, while giving its allies more authority."
New York Times: "A Japanese court rejected Friday patent claims made by Apple against Samsung, a victory for the Korean company after its crushing defeat in the United States last week and a reminder of the global scope of the patent war between the two technology giants."
ABC News: "The Pentagon has determined the former Navy SEAL who has authored a book about his role in the Osama bin Laden raid is in 'material breach' of non-disclosure agreements and warned him it is considering legal action against him as a result. It added that it is considering legal action against all those 'acting in concert' with the SEAL on his book, 'No Easy Day,' which is scheduled to be released Tuesday."
ABC News: "A former Marine who was working at a U.S. consulate office in China has pleaded guilty after trying -- and failing -- to spy for China, the Department of Justice said today. Bryan Underwood, 32, pleaded guilty to one charge for attempting to pass photographs and access to the U.S. consulate in Guangzhou, China to China's Ministry of State Security.... Underwood had "Top Secret" clearance...."
Washington Post: for murdering his ex-girlfriend Yeardley Love, George "Huguely [V] was sentenced to 23 years in prison by Circuit Court Judge Edward L. Hogshire, who chose to impose a shorter term than the 26 years recommended by the jury.... Huguely, 24, and Love, who was also a successful lacrosse player, were within weeks of graduation from" the University of Virginia.