The Commentariat -- Sept. 25, 2013
Paul Kane & Ed O'Keefe of the Washington Post: "The Senate moved Wednesday to take up a House-passed temporary spending bill that defunds President Obama's health-care law.... Shortly after 1 p.m., the funding bill passed its first procedural hurdle in the Senate, which voted unanimously to invoke cloture on a motion to proceed on the House's continuing resolution. The Senate now is scheduled to hold up to 30 hours of debate on the funding bill."
Lori Montgomery of the Washington Post: "Treasury Secretary Jack Lew warned congressional leaders Wednesday that he will exhaust emergency borrowing measures 'no later than Oct. 17,' leaving him with less than $30 billion on hand to pay the nation's bills. In a letter sent to all members of Congress, Lew urged immediate action to raise the federal debt limit, which stands at $16.7 trillion. Without additional borrowing authority, Lew warned, cash on hand 'would be far short of net expenditures on certain days, which can be as high as $60 billion.'"
It's Almost Over!
There was clapping when the marathon ended. Not sure if it was for or agin Ted. Harry Reid described Ted's speech as a "waste of time." Reid contrasts Ted with Republicans who "worked to accomplish things for this country.... A bad day for government is a good day for the Tea Party." Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) spoke passionately of the benefits of the ACA. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has been speaking for a few moments & he hasn't said a true word yet. ...
... Jeremy Peters & Jonathan Weisman of the New York Times: "Senator Ted Cruz ended his overnight assault on the new health care program at noon Wednesday after more than 21 hours on the Senate floor, clearing the way for a test vote on a plan to finance the government after Oct. 1 only if money is denied for the health law." ...
... Ed O'Keefe & Paul Kane of the Washington Post: "Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) ended his marathon talking attack on President Obama's health-care law after 21 hours and 19 minutes -- a feat of stamina that likely will complicate House GOP efforts to pass a funding bill aimed at averting a looming government shutdown." ...
... Jonathan Weisman: "Many Senate Republicans on Tuesday abandoned their colleague, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, in his tangled procedural fight over funding the government even as he took to the Senate floor and declared he would speak 'until I cannot stand' to rally voters against the new health care law. While the Senate appeared increasingly likely to override Mr. Cruz in a preliminary vote scheduled for Wednesday, Mr. Cruz pressed ahead with his opposition and compared his fight to leaders who stood against the Nazis, ended the cold war or launched the American Revolution.... Yet outside the chamber, his colleagues worked to actively thwart his efforts to block a vote to take up the House-passed bill that does precisely what he wants: funds the government through mid-December while defunding the Affordable Care Act.... Mr. Cruz's lonely stand was not really a filibuster. The first vote in a multiday process to get to a final showdown is set for around 10 a.m. Wednesday. Mr. Cruz could talk until then, but he is not able to delay or thwart the vote itself.... Senate Republicans pushed Mr. Cruz Tuesday to give up his stalling tactics.... If Mr. Cruz keeps up his crusade, the final vote cannot happen until Sunday." ...
... Sahil Kapur of TPM has more on "Rule 22," which governs debate in this instance & explains why Cruz's speechifying is a "fake filibuster." "An actual filibuster requires 41 votes to deny cloture and block legislation from moving forward. Cruz does not have that many votes." ...
It is just a form of governmental terrorism. -- Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), referring to Cruz's marathon Senate speech ...
... Jim Dwyer of the New York Times: Cruz's ploy "also struck [Rep. Peter] King as an unprincipled attempt to change the law without consent of the voters.... Mr. King himself said he had voted against the Obama health care overhaul at every opportunity, then voted to repeal it, and thinks it's a law that ought to be undone. 'But I also believe in democracy, and I don't mean that in a Fourth of July way,' he said. 'We've lost on the House floor, we lost on the Senate floor, the president signed the bill, the Supreme Court held it to be constitutional, and the 2012 election was run on Obamacare as much as any issue. President Obama won. I still think we should try to repeal the bill. But you repeal it the same way you passed it. You get bills through both houses of Congress, and you get the president to sign it.'" CW: Worth bearing in mind: King is running for president, & Cruz is expected to run against him. ...
... All about Ted. Dana Milbank: "A couple of hours before Sen. Ted Cruz launched his doomed filibuster, his Republican colleagues staged an intervention.... They pleaded with their junior colleague to reconsider his plan to block a vote on legislation that would keep the government open. The filibuster, ostensibly in opposition to Obamacare, would do nothing to halt the hated health-care reforms, they said. It would make Republicans look foolish. It would leave House Republicans with too little time to avoid a shutdown. And it could cause Republicans to be blamed for that shutdown.... His action hurt his fellow Republicans without doing anything to abolish Obamacare. But the filibuster did achieve something: It gave Cruz more TV exposure and further endeared him to the tea party. And for the ambitious senator from Texas, the most important thing has always been Ted Cruz." ...
... McKay Coppins, et al., of BuzzFeed: "Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's quixotic campaign to defund Obamacare -- currently culminating in an hours-long quasi-filibuster on the Senate floor -- has caused conservative activists across the country to swoon. But one key contingent of the Republican Party is decidedly unimpressed with the gambit: big-ticket donors.... Like most Americans, Republican donors generally oppose Obamacare -- but many disagree with the tactics Cruz has employed to block it. The Texas senator has pursued a strategy that could force a government shutdown unless funding for the law is revoked.... Several Republicans expressed doubt that the activist support Cruz is receiving will ultimately make up for the credibility he's losing among the big-money crowd." CW: This BuzzFeed piece is in line with safari's excellent comment in today's Comments section. ...
... Here's Ted comparing those very same Republican Senators to the reviled Neville Chamberlain:
... CW: I checked C-SPAN at 8:30 pm ET Tuesday, & Ted is still at it (with a little assist from Jim Inhofe. ...
... Update: I see Ted's "heroic" stand is getting a lot of help from his friends. Mostly when I tune into CSPAN, it's Not Ted speaking. ...
... Update 2: It's 3 am ET, & Ted & Mike are continuing their excellent conversation. Mike seems a little tired & confused, but Ted looks great. Makes me wonder if Ted is human.
... Update 3: It's 9 am ET, & Ted still looks great; he's speaking coherently (I guess, at least in complete sentences), & he doesn't have a weekend stubble. Even his clothes, which appear to be the same outfit he had on yesterday, looked pressed & fresh. Definitely. Not. Human.
... AND the Usual Suspects. Ed O'Keefe & Paul Kane of the Washington Post: "Cruz ... was joined in his efforts by several other Republican senators, including Mike Lee (Utah), David Vitter (La.), Rand Paul (Ky.), Pat Roberts (Kan.), Jeff Sessions (Ala.) and Marco Rubio (Fla.). Paul even sent a callout on Twitter asking supporters to send him questions that he said he would ask Cruz later on the Senate floor." ...
... No doubt you'll want to pass along to the kiddies this reading of Green Eggs & Ham.
... As contributor Ken Winkes pointed out in today's Comments, the author of Green Eggs & Ham, Dr. Seuss (Ted Geisel) was a lefty. Matt Yglesias of Slate: "Admittedly, Green Eggs and Ham lacks the overt left-wing politics of a Butter Battle Book or The Lorax but this is still a progressive book. In broad strokes, it's a book advocating openness to experience -- one of the key moral dimensions on which liberals and conservatives differ.... The Democrats' bet on the Affordable Care Act is that it's like green eggs and ham -- they're convinced the public will like it when they try it. Conservatives like Cruz .. are engaging in flailing desperate tactics to make sure nobody tries the green eggs and ham. Because deep down they fear that Dr. Seuss was right." ...
... NEW. Tal Kopan of Politico: Sen. Claire "McCaskill [D-Mo.] said she thinks the book's message is a good one for Republicans to learn, that when Obamacare exchanges open Oct. 1 and Americans enroll, they will try it and like it, just like the main character in Dr. Seuss's book and the infamous green eggs and ham":
... CW: From contributor Kate M., composed, I think, by a friend of hers:
... CW: Apparently all over the Internets inquiring minds are wanting to know who Corner Guy is:
... Benny Johnson of BuzzFeed has the answer (you should read/look at the whole post). Corner Guy is John R. Ellis, IV. AND, curiously, "he is Ted Cruz's legal counsel" AND "he got his JD at Samford University Cumberland School of Law.... And a BA in political science and government from the University of North Texas." I say this is curious because according to a GQ profile by Jason Zengerle (linked yesterday), "As a law student at Harvard, he refused to study with anyone who hadn't been an undergrad at Harvard, Princeton, or Yale. Says Damon Watson, one of Cruz's law-school roommates: 'He said he didn't want anybody from 'minor Ivies' like Penn or Brown.'" (GQ editors have since added a note to Zengerle's report: noting that "GQ's original article should have reported that Cruz voiced his reluctance rather than flat-out refused." Their explanation is in the editor's note at the linked page.) I hate to tell Ted, but the U. of North Texas is not exactly an "ivy," or even a "minor ivy," & neither is Samford U. I guess Ted isn't an elitist anymore. At all. Not one bit. ...
... Jake Sherman & John Bresnahan of Politico: "The House Republican leadership is seriously considering attaching a one-year delay of Obamacare's individual mandate to the Senate bill to avert a government shutdown, according to senior GOP aides. If House Republicans decide to go this route, it would all but provoke a government shutdown, since Senate Democrats might not even schedule a vote on a bill that includes that provision, Senate leadership staffers say. Even if the Senate schedules a vote, there might not be time to move the legislation through the slow-moving chamber." ...
... MEANWHILE, Up the Road in New York City.... Martha Moore of USA Today: "In a nearly hour-long pitch for his signature legislative achievement, [President] Obama and his health care ally, former president Bill Clinton, said that mandated health insurance would improve the economy and torpedo the budget deficit, all for the cost, Obama said, of a monthly cellphone bill":
I can tell you right now that in many states across the country, if you're, say, a 27-year-old young woman, don't have health insurance, you get on that exchange, you're going to be able to purchase high-quality health insurance for less than the cost of your cellphone bill. -- Barack Obama, Tuesday
... ALSO. Maggie Haberman of Politico: "Hillary Clinton made a forceful case in support of Obamacare's implementation and slammed the "noisy minority" of Senate Republicans advocating defunding the program, saying a government shutdown will be blamed on Republicans and 'we've seen that movie before.' 'I find the debate over the issue to be quite unfortunate,' Clinton said at an afternoon panel at the Clinton Global Initiative in Manhattan, two hours before her husband and President Obama were set to take the stage to discuss the health care initiative." ...
... Robert Pear & Reed Abelson of the New York Times: " The Obama administration on Tuesday provided the first detailed look at premiums to be charged to consumers for health insurance in 36 states where the federal government will run new insurance markets starting next week, highlighting costs it said were generally lower than previous estimates.... However, the data provided only a partial picture of the reality that consumers will face."
Tom Edsall of the New York Times takes a look at the work of some social scientists to try to figure out why Tea Party conservatives are so radical, or -- as some traditional conservatives observe, not actually conservative at all. Edsall concludes, "Until more white voters come to terms with their status as an emerging American minority, the forces driving voters to support Tea Party candidates and elected officials who adamantly reject compromise will remain strong -- and the Republican Party will remain fractured." ...
... Zachary Goldfarb of the Washington Post: "Democrats are working hard to exploit massive unrest in the Republican Party over the looming government shutdown, which many see as one of their best chances of holding the Senate or even gaining the House in next year's midterm elections."
Shashank Bengali of the Los Angeles Times: "Signaling that he may be serious about giving up his chemical weapons, Syrian President Bashar Assad has disclosed the locations of dozens of poison gas production and storage sites to international inspectors, according to Western officials." ...
... Rick Gladstone of the New York Times: "In what may have been the most widely awaited speech at the United Nations, Iran's new president, Hassan Rouhani, preached tolerance and understanding on Tuesday, denounced as a form of violence the Western sanctions imposed on his country and said nuclear weapons had no place in its future. Mr. Rouhani, whose speech followed President Obama's by more than six hours, also acknowledged Mr. Obama's outreach to Iran aimed at resolving more than three decades of estrangement and recrimination, and expressed hope that 'we can arrive at a framework to manage our differences.'" ...
... CW: It's a Three-Fer for MoDo! A confluence of circumstances gave her a chance to bash President Obama, President Clinton & Secretary of State Clinton. ...
... OR, you might prefer John Judis's analysis: "President Barack Obama's speech Tuesday to the United Nations was his most significant foreign policy statement since becoming president.... The speech ... displayed what has always been the most attractive feature of Obama's foreign policy, one that clearly sets him off from his predecessor -- his willingness to court erstwhile enemies and adversaries, or to put it in negative terms, his not possessing what my former colleague Peter Scoblic called an 'us versus them' view of the world."
Obama 2.Zero. Daniel Klaidman of the Daily Beast: "It’s been two months since the Homeland Security secretary [Janet Napolitano] announced her plans to resign, but the White House still isn't close to settling on a replacement, according to administration officials familiar with the search. At least two potential candidates have rebuffed their advances."
Craig Whitlock of the Washington Post tells a slightly different story from the L.A. Times story I linked yesterday re: the 2007 background check of Aaron Alexis, the Navy Yard shooter. The Times story doesn't mention USIS, but Whitlock writes, "Alexis's security clearance background check was performed by USIS, a Falls Church government contractor, on behalf of the federal Office of Personnel Management. Last week, OPM said in a statement that the check was performed properly, 'in compliance with all investigative standards.' Portions of the check provided to the Navy, however, do not mention that he had been charged with a gun-related crime in Seattle, only that he had been engaged in a verbal altercation with a construction worker."
** Where's My Pitchfork Lynchin' Rope? Ezra Klein: "AIG's CEO Robert Benmosche -- who came in to rescue the company after the 2008 financial crisis -- told the Wall Street Journal that the outrage over the bonuses promised to AIG's members was just as bad as when white supremacists in the American South used to lynch African Americans.... Yes, enduring some public criticism for receiving multimillion-dollar bonuses after helping crash the global economy is a lot like being hanged from a tree by your neck until you die." CW: Seriously, somebody should shake some sense into these reprehensible, thin-skinned crybabies. ...
... Matt Taibbi: "Stories like this 'hangman nooses' thing give some insight into the oft-asked question of how the 2008 crisis could ever have happened, the answer being that the people who run our economy, like Benmosche, are basically idiots." Read Taibbi's whole post as he wanders into other aspects of Benmosche's assholedness. Thanks to contributor MAG for the link. ...
... Digby: "I honestly don't know when I've ever seen a more repulsive spectacle than these vastly wealthy Wall Street barons whining and blubbering over and over again about how unfair it is that they aren't popular. Even now! What a big bunch of Marsha, Marsha, Marsha losers. Just crawl off somewhere, count your money and STFU." ...
... AND for readers who think, "Oh, well, so what? This is just hyperbole," Paul Waldman of the American Prospect provides a point-by-point about all that is wrong with Benmosche's false analogy.
George Chen of the South China Morning Post: "Beijing has made the landmark decision to lift a ban on internet access within the Shanghai Free-trade Zone to foreign websites considered politically sensitive by the Chinese government, including Facebook, Twitter and newspaper website The New York Times." Via Alex Rogers of Time.
News Lede
New York Times: "Over two decades at the nonprofit Metropolitan New York Council on Jewish Poverty, [William E.] Rapfogel and two confederates stole more than $5 million, much of it taxpayer money, said [a criminal] complaint, which detailed the schemes and charged Mr. Rapfogel with grand larceny, money laundering and other crimes."