The Ledes

Thursday, July 3, 2025

CNBC: “Job growth proved better than expected in June, as the labor market showed surprising resilience and likely taking a July interest rate cut off the table. Nonfarm payrolls increased a seasonally adjusted 147,000 for the month, higher than the estimate for 110,000 and just above the upwardly revised 144,000 in May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Thursday. April’s tally also saw a small upward revision, now at 158,000 following an 11,000 increase.... Though the jobless rates fell [to 4.1%], it was due largely to a decrease in those working or looking for jobs.”

Washington Post: “A warehouse storing fireworks in Northern California exploded on Tuesday, leaving seven people missing and two injured as explosions continued into Wednesday evening, officials said. Dramatic video footage captured by KCRA 3 News, a Sacramento broadcaster, showed smoke pouring from the building’s roof before a massive explosion created a fireball that seemed to engulf much of the warehouse, accompanied by an echoing boom. Hundreds of fireworks appeared to be going off and were sparkling within the smoke. Photos of the aftermath showed multiple destroyed buildings and a large area covered in gray ash.” ~~~

The Wires
powered by Surfing Waves
The Ledes

Wednesday, July 2, 2025

New York Times: “The Rev. Jimmy Swaggart, who emerged from the backwoods of Louisiana to become a television evangelist with global reach, preaching about an eternal struggle between good and evil and warning of the temptations of the flesh, a theme that played out in his own life in a sex scandal, died on July 1. He was 90.” ~~~

     ~~~ For another sort of obituary, see Akhilleus' commentary near the end of yesterday's thread.

Help!

To keep the Conversation going, please help me by linking news articles, opinion pieces and other political content in today's Comments section.

Link Code:   <a href="URL">text</a>

OR here's a link generator. The one I had posted died, then Akhilleus found one, but it too bit the dust. He found yet another, which I've linked here, and as of September 23, 2024, it's working.

OR you can always just block, copy and paste to your comment the URL (Web address) of the page you want to link.

Note for Readers. It is not possible for commenters to "throw" their highlighted links to another window. But you can do that yourself. Right-click on the link and a drop-down box will give you choices as to where you want to open the link: in a new tab, new window or new private window.

Thank you to everyone who has been contributing links to articles & other content in the Comments section of each day's "Conversation." If you're missing the comments, you're missing some vital links.

INAUGURATION 2029

Commencement ceremonies are joyous occasions, and Steve Carell made sure that was true this past weekend (mid-June) at Northwestern's commencement:

~~~ Carell's entire commencement speech was hilarious. The audio and video here isn't great, but I laughed till I cried.

CNN did a live telecast Saturday night (June 7) of the Broadway play "Good Night, and Good Luck," written by George Clooney and Grant Heslov, about legendary newsman Edward R. Murrow's effort to hold to account Sen. Joe McCarthy, "the junior senator from Wisconsin." Clooney plays Murrow. Here's Murrow himself with his famous take on McCarthy & McCarthyism, brief remarks that especially resonate today: ~~~

     ~~~ This article lists ways you still can watch the play. 

New York Times: “The New York Times Company has agreed to license its editorial content to Amazon for use in the tech giant’s artificial intelligence platforms, the company said on Thursday. The multiyear agreement 'will bring Times editorial content to a variety of Amazon customer experiences,' the news organization said in a statement. Besides news articles, the agreement encompasses material from NYT Cooking, The Times’s food and recipe site, and The Athletic, which focuses on sports. This is The Times’s first licensing arrangement with a focus on generative A.I. technology. In 2023, The Times sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, for copyright infringement, accusing the tech companies of using millions of articles published by The Times to train automated chatbots without any kind of compensation. OpenAI and Microsoft have rejected those accusations.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I have no idea what this means for "the Amazon customer experience." Does it mean that if I don't have a NYT subscription but do have Amazon Prime I can read NYT content? And where, exactly, would I find that content? I don't know. I don't know.

Washington Post reporters asked three AI image generators what a beautiful woman looks like. "The Post found that they steer users toward a startlingly narrow vision of attractiveness. Prompted to show a 'beautiful woman,' all three tools generated thin women, without exception.... Her body looks like Barbie — slim hips, impossible waist, round breasts.... Just 2 percent of the images showed visible signs of aging. More than a third of the images had medium skin tones. But only nine percent had dark skin tones. Asked to show 'normal women,' the tools produced images that remained overwhelmingly thin.... However bias originates, The Post’s analysis found that popular image tools struggle to render realistic images of women outside the Western ideal." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The reporters seem to think they are calling out the AI programs for being unrealistic. But there's a lot about the "beautiful women" images they miss. I find these omissions remarkably sexist. For one thing, the reporters seem to think AI is a magical "thing" that self-generates. It isn't. It's programmed. It's programmed by boys, many of them incels who have little or no experience or insights beyond comic books and Internet porn of how to gauge female "beauty." As a result, the AI-generated women look like cartoons; that is, a lot like an air-brushed photo of Kristi Noem: globs of every kind of dark eye makeup, Scandinavian nose, Botox lips, slathered-on skin concealer/toner/etc. makeup, long dark hair and the aforementioned impossible Barbie body shape, including huge, round plastic breasts. 

New York Times: “George Clooney’s Broadway debut, 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' has been one of the sensations of the 2024-25 theater season, breaking box office records and drawing packed houses of audiences eager to see the popular movie star in a timely drama about the importance of an independent press. Now the play will become much more widely available: CNN is planning a live broadcast of the penultimate performance, on June 7 at 7 p.m. Eastern. The performance will be preceded and followed by coverage of, and discussion about, the show and the state of journalism.”

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land. -- Magna Carta ~~~

~~~ New York Times: “Bought for $27.50 after World War II, the faint, water stained manuscript in the library of Harvard Law School had attracted relatively little attention since it arrived there in 1946. That is about to change. Two British academics, one of whom happened on the manuscript by chance, have discovered that it is an original 1300 version — not a copy, as long thought — of Magna Carta, the medieval document that helped establish some of the world’s most cherished liberties. It is one of just seven such documents from that date still in existence.... A 710-year-old version of Magna Carta was sold in 2007 for $21.3 million.... First issued in 1215, it put into writing a set of concessions won by rebellious barons from a recalcitrant King John of England — or Bad King John, as he became known in folklore. He later revoked the charter, but his son, Henry III, issued amended versions, the last one in 1225, and Henry’s son, Edward I, in turn confirmed the 1225 version in 1297 and again in 1300.”

NPR lists all of the 2025 Pulitzer Prize winners. Poynter lists the prizes awarded in journalism as well as the finalists in these categories.

 

Contact Marie

Email Marie at constantweader@gmail.com

Friday
Mar132020

I Forgot

Caitlin Oprysko of Politico: "... Donald Trump on Friday deflected blame for his administration's lagging ability to test Americans for the coronavirus outbreak, insisting instead -- without offering evidence -- that fault lies with his predecessor, Barack Obama. 'I don't take responsibility at all,' Trump said defiantly, pointing to an unspecified 'set of circumstances' and 'rules, regulations and specifications from a different time.'... Trump later got testy with another reporter who pressed him on whether he bore any responsibility for the surge in cases, noting that he'd disbanded the White House's pandemic office."

Washington Post (live update): "When pressed by Yamiche Alcindor, the White House correspondent for PBS NewsHour, about the White House dismantling the office on pandemics, he called the question 'nasty' and suggested that Anthony S. Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, knew something he didn't. 'I didn't do it,' [Trump] said. 'I could perhaps ask Tony about that because I don't know anything about it. I mean you say we did that but I don't know anything about it.' Fauci, who works under the National Institutes of Health, does not have purview over the National Security Council, which the team worked for."

Trump's full exchange with Alcindor is pretty remarkable. And of course he called her question "nasty." She's a black woman, for Pete's sake. Alcindor said later on MSNBC that she had a follow-up response/question for Trump, but the White House had cut her mic.

What's more remarkable is that Trump tried to deflect a question about the National Security Council to Fauci, who is not on the NSC. Trump, on the other hand, is chair of the NSC. He's the guy. "I didn't do it, ask Tony" is an insane response. Alcindor asked the right question of the right guy.

As Lena Sun of the Washington Post reported in May 2018, "The top White House official responsible for leading the U.S. response in the event of a deadly pandemic has left the administration, and the global health security team he oversaw has been disbanded under a reorganization by national security adviser John Bolton. The abrupt departure of Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer from the National Security Council means no senior administration official is now focused solely on global health security. Ziemer's departure, along with the breakup of his team, comes at a time when many experts say the country is already underprepared for the increasing risks of a pandemic or bioterrorism attack."

As it turns out, Trump has been asked this same question before, and recently. Then he had very different answers, answers that suggest he knew damned well his office had disbanded the global pandemic team.

"Who would have thought?" Who could have known getting rid of advisors responsible for monitoring, reporting & coordinating response to an international pandemic would be a problem? Way last week (March 7), Trump himself explained that this whole "foreign virus" thing was a big surprise. A reporter asked him if he would rethink having an office of pandemic preparation in the White House. Trump's response: "I just think this is something, Peter, that you can never really think is going to happen.... I think we're doing a really good job in this country at keeping it down. We've really been very vigilant, and we've done a tremendous job at keeping to down. But who would have thought? Look, how long ago is it? Six, seven, eight weeks ago -- who would have thought we would even be having the subject? We were going to hit 30,000 on the Dow like it was clockwork. Right? It was all going -- it was right up, and then all of a sudden, this came out.... And the thing is, you never really know when something like this is going to strike and what it's going to be. This is different than something else. This is a very different thing than something else."

So Trump seemed to know -- less than a week before -- that he had disbanded the global health security office. He knew he did it because he figured he would get lucky and there would be no pandemics on his watch. I mean, nobody can predict the future; nobody can predict a thing that's "very different than something else."

Besides, as he had already explained, getting rid of the global health team was a good business decision. And it would never be a problem. He could reassemble the team "very quickly":

On February 26, a reporter asked Trump if his "enormous cuts to the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO' gave him pause now that the country was confronted by a major health crisis. Trump's response: "No, because we -- we can get money and we can increase staff. We know all the people. We know all the good people. It's a question I asked the doctors before. Some of the people we cut, they haven't been used for many, many years. And if -- if we have a need, we can get them very quickly. And rather than spending the money -- and I'm a business person -- I don't like having thousands of people around when you don't need them. When we need them, we can get them back very quickly."

This isn't true. Beth Reinhard & others of the Washington Post reported (Feb. 27), "Former USAID official Jeremy Konyndyk, who helped lead the U.S. response to the Ebola outbreak and other international disasters during the Obama administration, said recruiting people with the specialized skills to handle an infectious-disease crisis is difficult.... Cyrus Shahpar, a physician who served at the CDC under Obama and worked on the agency's global rapid-response team during the first year of the Trump administration..., [said] it is not easy to persuade a lot of people with specialized skills to suddenly shift to federal service to help respond to a threat.... 'They have stable jobs with retirement plans,' he said. 'They are not going to quit their job at the university or quit their job in the local government to go join the U.S. federal government for six months because of coronavirus. It doesn't work like that.' In November 2019, a commission on health security that included Republican and Democratic members of Congress warned that 'the American people are far from safe.'"

So a week ago, and two weeks ago, Trump not only knew he had axed the global health security team, he produced a number of "reasons" as to why that was a smart idea: nobody can predict a pandemic, the team was just sitting around doing nothing but collecting paychecks, they would come right back to work if he called them. But by Friday, he forgot all that. By Friday, his past decisions were another excuse to insult a black woman.

Reader Comments (3)

"Trump's full exchange with Alcindor is pretty remarkable. And of course he called her "nasty." She's a black woman, for Pete's sake. Alcindor said later on MSNBC that she had a follow-up response/question for Trump, but the White House had cut her mic."

Trump didn't actually call Alcindor nasty, he said her "question was nasty," but after thinking about this I think you are right as rain, Marie, for two reasons.

One: Who refers to a question as "nasty?"
Two: Being a black woman, fatty sees "nasty" if she has the audacity to question him the way she did. He probably also envisioned blood coming from her wherever.

I think it was Tony Schwartz, one of the authors of books ghost written for Fatty, who told us that during all his time with Trump, not once did he concede that he was wrong and there were plenty of instances where he had gotten facts wildly incorrect. "He will never apologize for anything" and then Tony added, "As a president this is dangerous."

Another ringing non- endorsement from those that knew then and warned us. Who knew we had so many with clogged ear wax or/and had such a desperate need to be a player in this game of palace intrigue and pure applesauce. And now we have come to this.

March 14, 2020 | Unregistered CommenterPD Pepe

@PD Pepe: You're right. I corrected my remark in the body of the page.

March 14, 2020 | Registered CommenterMarie Burns

"... And the thing is, you never really know when something like this is going to strike and what it’s going to be."

Which is exactly why you need "preparedness" Global Pandemic leadership at the White House level. The USG has for decadees known that a novel pandemic will come out of somewhere and hop on a jet for Yourtown USA. The Q is not "if", but "when" and "how bad."

Like you need a fire house at the city level

EMTs; HAZMAT crews; accident investigators; hospital emergency rooms; etc.

When you are paying them to exist, they are doing their job. You don't need to have your house on fire to think that it's a good idea to have a ladder company within 5 minutes drive, even if all you've ever seen them do is wash their units.

I'm sure that DiJiT really had no idea that the pandemic operation in the NSC was dismantled. If he saw it in a list of cuts he would have forgotten about it in a nanosecond. But the people who did it were following his general guidance, eliminating WH components that were responsible for things that POTUS* is not interested in. A lot of that was executing government cuts sought for years by the American Enterprise Institute, whose objectives were adopted in great part by the Trump "transition."

March 14, 2020 | Unregistered CommenterPatrick
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.