The Commentariat -- May 12, 2013
See also commentary from MAG & safari in yesterday's Commentariat that got spammed & is now despamified.
Obama 2.Zero. Jeremy Peters of the New York Times: "Just days after Republicans used Senate rules to block two nominees from moving to the next step in the confirmation process despite the fact that both have the support of a majority of senators, Democrats are planning to force committee votes without Republican consent. If Democrats do push the nominees through to the full Senate, they would almost certainly set off a Republican filibuster, which would jeopardize the confirmations and, for now, leave vacancies at the top of two federal agencies."
** What Republicans Are Doing While We're Not Looking. Teresa Tritch of the New York Times: "There are two good things to say about the Working Families Flexibility Act, which passed the House this week with 220 Republican and three Democratic votes. One, the bill is bound to go nowhere in the Senate and, two, even if it did advance, the White House has threatened to veto it. The bill, in brief, is worse than meritless; it is a fraud.... The bill would amend long-standing labor law by allowing private-sector employers to offer compensatory time off in lieu of time-and-a-half pay for overtime.... There is nothing to stop an employer from discriminating against those who prefer payment by cutting back on their overtime hours. Nor would employers face any real deterrent against forcing unpaid overtime on workers who fear losing their jobs if they object. The recourse for coerced workers would be to sue, a far-fetched and unaffordable option for most people." Thanks to Jeanne B. for the heads-up. ...
... Judith Warner of Time has more.
Alex Seitz-Wald of Salon: "Republican members of Congress raised no objections when they first saw internal emails detailing the evolution of the administration's talking points on Benghazi almost two months ago, senior administration officials said..., and House Speaker John Boehner declined to attend or send a representative to that briefing." ...
... CW: I wish I had time to watch this discussion among Bill Maher, Joy Reid, Glenn Greenwald & Charlie Cooke on Benghazzzzzzi. I hope you do.
Lauren French of Politico: "Senior Internal Revenue Service officials knew employees were singling out conservative groups for extra scrutiny as early as 2011, according to a watchdog agency's report set to be released next week, POLITICO has confirmed from a congressional source. The disclosure that senior officials knew agents were flagging applications containing the words 'patriot' or 'tea party' contradicts public statements by former IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. He repeatedly denied that his agency was targeting conservative groups when asked by Congress last year." CW: Keep in mind this little factoid French doesn't mention: Shulman is a Dubya appointee. But she does write this: "The disclosures are guaranteed to heighten Republican fears that the agency is targeting the administration's political enemies and hands the GOP a fresh issue to use in attacking President Barack Obama's administration." ...
... Stephen Ohlemacher of the AP writes a more balanced report.
Aqua Buddha Is Still Crazy. Ezra Klein: Sen. Rand Paul (RTP-Ky.) claims in a fundraiser e-mail that President Obama "is working with 'anti-American globalists plot[ting] against our Constitution.' This [U.N. Small Arms] treaty, [which is the subject of Paul's scary e-mail] at least as described here, is total fantasy. The hoax-busters at Snopes.com will catch you up, and just for good measure, PolitiFact gave similar claims the old pants-on-fire. This is black helicopter stuff from Paul."
Steve M. of No More Mister Nice Blog summarizes the shocking scandals and "the dangerous Satanic power of Barack Obama." Such a quick read I have a sneaking suspicion Steve is not sufficiently scandalized.
This post by Evan McMurry of Mediate about a Koch-BuzzFeed immigration forum is mostly inside-baseball stuff, but McMurry ends with a lovely knock at the Heritage Foundation: "If you classify everything to the left of 'immigrants are inherently dumb' as amnesty, the world will indeed look like a conspiracy in favor of it."
Judge John d'Amico, writing in Salon, notes that the Tea Party doesn't seem to understand our founding documents.
Gail Collins on corrupt state legislatures. Pathetic &, as usual, funny.
Reader Comments (3)
Regarding yesterday's piece on college financial aid: Last night it occurred to me that I never see articles excoriating, say, oil companies for charging the same price for fuel to the rich and poor alike. I understand that colleges are sitting on record profits and many oil companies are barely getting by, but still, one would think that basic tenets of journalism would dictate that rich colleges and poor oil companies be judged by the same yardstick.
My comment on the Ohlemacher article:
A too typical tempest in (dare one say?) a right wing teapot.
Because many so-called apolitical groups seek tax exempt status they do not deserve, the IRS would have been flat dumb not to have flagged groups with transparently political buzz words in their names. Considered in the wider context the the entire tax exempt scam, this tea tempest is minor, but super-sizing the minuscule is (Benghazi anyone?) all the Right has in an arsenal so empty of real policy.
If we wished to get excited about some real abuse, I'd suggest the thousands of churches that indulge in what is clearly political activities lose their exempt status forthwith. Only if that were done, could we say there is some honest basis to tax-exempt status....and we would have solved our tax revenue problem at the same time.
The Bill Maher, Joy Reid, Glenn Greenwald & Charlie Cooke confab: Greenwald is not as smart as I'd given credit, Cooke is just as smugly dumb as the rest at National Review, and Reid had trouble hurtling the male egos to get a word in edgewise. Maher? As always amusing but irrelevant.