The Wires
powered by Surfing Waves
Help!

To keep the Conversation going, please help me by linking news articles, opinion pieces and other political content in today's Comments section.

Link Code:   <a href="URL">text</a>

OR here's a link generator. The one I had posted died, then Akhilleus found one, but it too bit the dust. He found yet another, which I've linked here, and as of September 23, 2024, it's working.

OR you can always just block, copy and paste to your comment the URL (Web address) of the page you want to link.

Note for Readers. It is not possible for commenters to "throw" their highlighted links to another window. But you can do that yourself. Right-click on the link and a drop-down box will give you choices as to where you want to open the link: in a new tab, new window or new private window.

Thank you to everyone who has been contributing links to articles & other content in the Comments section of each day's "Conversation." If you're missing the comments, you're missing some vital links.

INAUGURATION 2029

Marie: I don't know why this video came up on my YouTube recommendations, but it did. I watched it on a large-ish teevee, and I found it fascinating. ~~~

 

Hubris. One would think that a married man smart enough to start up and operate his own tech company was also smart enough to know that you don't take your girlfriend to a public concert where the equipment includes a jumbotron -- unless you want to get caught on the big camera with your arms around said girlfriend. Ah, but for Andy Bryon, CEO of A company called Astronomer, and also maybe his wife, Wednesday was a night that will live in infamy. New York Times link. ~~~

Commencement ceremonies are joyous occasions, and Steve Carell made sure that was true this past weekend (mid-June) at Northwestern's commencement:

~~~ Carell's entire commencement speech was hilarious. The audio and video here isn't great, but I laughed till I cried.

CNN did a live telecast Saturday night (June 7) of the Broadway play "Good Night, and Good Luck," written by George Clooney and Grant Heslov, about legendary newsman Edward R. Murrow's effort to hold to account Sen. Joe McCarthy, "the junior senator from Wisconsin." Clooney plays Murrow. Here's Murrow himself with his famous take on McCarthy & McCarthyism, brief remarks that especially resonate today: ~~~

     ~~~ This article lists ways you still can watch the play. 

New York Times: “The New York Times Company has agreed to license its editorial content to Amazon for use in the tech giant’s artificial intelligence platforms, the company said on Thursday. The multiyear agreement 'will bring Times editorial content to a variety of Amazon customer experiences,' the news organization said in a statement. Besides news articles, the agreement encompasses material from NYT Cooking, The Times’s food and recipe site, and The Athletic, which focuses on sports. This is The Times’s first licensing arrangement with a focus on generative A.I. technology. In 2023, The Times sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, for copyright infringement, accusing the tech companies of using millions of articles published by The Times to train automated chatbots without any kind of compensation. OpenAI and Microsoft have rejected those accusations.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: I have no idea what this means for "the Amazon customer experience." Does it mean that if I don't have a NYT subscription but do have Amazon Prime I can read NYT content? And where, exactly, would I find that content? I don't know. I don't know.

Washington Post reporters asked three AI image generators what a beautiful woman looks like. "The Post found that they steer users toward a startlingly narrow vision of attractiveness. Prompted to show a 'beautiful woman,' all three tools generated thin women, without exception.... Her body looks like Barbie — slim hips, impossible waist, round breasts.... Just 2 percent of the images showed visible signs of aging. More than a third of the images had medium skin tones. But only nine percent had dark skin tones. Asked to show 'normal women,' the tools produced images that remained overwhelmingly thin.... However bias originates, The Post’s analysis found that popular image tools struggle to render realistic images of women outside the Western ideal." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The reporters seem to think they are calling out the AI programs for being unrealistic. But there's a lot about the "beautiful women" images they miss. I find these omissions remarkably sexist. For one thing, the reporters seem to think AI is a magical "thing" that self-generates. It isn't. It's programmed. It's programmed by boys, many of them incels who have little or no experience or insights beyond comic books and Internet porn of how to gauge female "beauty." As a result, the AI-generated women look like cartoons; that is, a lot like an air-brushed photo of Kristi Noem: globs of every kind of dark eye makeup, Scandinavian nose, Botox lips, slathered-on skin concealer/toner/etc. makeup, long dark hair and the aforementioned impossible Barbie body shape, including huge, round plastic breasts. 

New York Times: “George Clooney’s Broadway debut, 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' has been one of the sensations of the 2024-25 theater season, breaking box office records and drawing packed houses of audiences eager to see the popular movie star in a timely drama about the importance of an independent press. Now the play will become much more widely available: CNN is planning a live broadcast of the penultimate performance, on June 7 at 7 p.m. Eastern. The performance will be preceded and followed by coverage of, and discussion about, the show and the state of journalism.”

 

Contact Marie

Email Marie at constantweader@gmail.com

Wednesday
Jul202022

The Plot Lengthens

Largely because we learned bit-by-bit the elements of Donald Trump's plot to overturn the 2020 election, and also because of the ragtag band of wacky, unscrupulous characters who helped him carry out his plot, many of us thought Trump's attempts to retain power were the last-minute, haphazard endeavors of a desperate lunatic who could not "face" the loss he had suffered. But as the House's January 6 select committee hearings have brought into focus, Trump had developed a multi-faceted approach to overturning the election. So we can forget Rudy Giuliani's press conference in the Four Seasons Total Landscaping parking lot and all the other laughably inept post-election shenanigans. As it turns out, Donald Trump had planned at least some of his nefarious scheme for six months.

As early as May 2020, Trump kicked in one part of his plot to overturn the election if he lost in November. He began repeatedly badmouthing mail-in ballots. This was much to the consternation of Republican operatives who knew that many older Republicans voted by mail, that voting by mail was generally fair and safe, and that Trump's opposition to vote-by-mail would depress Republican vote totals. Some Republicans attempted to explain this to Trump and urged him to embrace vote-by-mail. But he remained adamantly opposed to mail-in ballots and declared them an important element in an election-year "fraud" and "hoax." No one understood why. At first he was claiming that "foreign countries" were flooding the system with counterfeit ballots, which would result in a "rigged" (or "RIGGED") election. By early September, Trump was repeatedly claiming that Democrats were mailing out 80 million unsolicited ballots.

Recently, we learned from an audio recording which Dan Friedman of Mother Jones obtained that on October 31, 2020 -- a few days before the election -- Steve Bannon told a group that Trump would declare victory late on voting-day night, whether or not the AP & television networks had called the election. Bannon explained that Trump knew that early counts in close, key states would show Trump ahead of Joe Biden -- precisely because masses of Democrats had voted by mail, and that their ballots would take days to tally. Friedman notes that other reporting backs up Bannon's claim about Trump's strategy. ~~~

Trump did just what Bannon had predicted. In the wee hours of the morning following the election, he stepped to a White House podium and announced he had won. He carried his declaration a step further: he called for all vote-counting to stop. "We don't want them to find any ballots at 4 o'clock in the morning," Trump said. On Thursday of that week, he tweeted, "STOP THE COUNT!" The AP & networks would call the national race for Biden two days later, on Saturday.

So now we understand Trump's opposition to mail-in-ballots. It had nothing to do with voting integrity, of course. It was part of his plot to "win" even if he lost. And he set it in motion way back in the spring of 2020.  

Reader Comments (3)

None of this should come as a surprise to anyone who has paid attention to 60 odd years of this crook’s adult life. Trump has never played it straight a single day on this earth. He has ignored federal laws in order to stick it to Black families who sought to rent one of his apartments. He has routinely stiffed employees and contractors. He forces people to take him to court than turns around and sues them. He has weaseled out of paying taxes for years. He cheated on all his wives. He lies about everything. He even cheats at golf, fer crissakes. The first time around, in 2016, he repeatedly declared that the election could only be considered fair if he won. He begged an antagonistic foreign power to help him screw his opponent. They did.

Then, after slithering into the White House, he broke law after law in an attempt to get his way on virtually every front. Sure, courts stepped and told him to knock that shit off, and he called those judges corrupt and sicced his thugs on his perceived enemies. He used his position to further enrich himself, against the express direction of the Constitution and federal laws.

Who thought it was possible that, now in control of the full power of the federal government, he’d play fair in a second election, especially one that looked like it could be close after he had allowed hundreds of thousands of Americans to die in order to make himself look better. This asshole killed people in order to improve his chances of winning a contest!

Of course he planned to cheat. Again. To weasel the biggest trophy in his life, bugger than any other he’d stolen or finagled before.

He’s a crook, a thug, a cheater, a liar, and…the biggest loser. No way he was going to let everyone call him that.

July 21, 2022 | Unregistered CommenterAkhilleus

@Ak: You left out fat and repulsive....beauty is in the eye of the
beholder. I don't behold a smitherine of beauty there.

July 21, 2022 | Unregistered CommenterForrest Morris

And before he became president he declared that "I told lies all the time and the paper printed them." Where were the voices that asked "what were those lies? What paper printed them? His University scam was just one of those many notches in his belt that became a wisp in the wind like all the rest of his circus barking. Republicans––not all–- embraced him because their base needed this kind of Mob boss to win an election to beat a democrat–-a woman, this time–-enough of a disaster to put up with a Black man for all those years! And look at how so many flock to his rallies––-he's so entertaining plus he speaks their language.

"I don't like losers"––––Yup! You have made that crystal clear, you poor excuse for a human being!

July 21, 2022 | Unregistered CommenterP.D. Pepe
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.