The Commentariat -- October 1, 2013
Via the Washington Post, here's a full transcript of the President's remarks early this afternoon. ...
Thanks to MAG for the lead.
** Joshua Holland, writing in Bill Moyers' Journal, fingers the media as part of the problem: "... with a demographic tide going against them, Republicans have gradually jettisoned the norms that make democratic governance possible. First they filibustered virtually everything. Then they started creating these annual budget showdowns to fight for cuts in taxes and spending. Now they're using the budget battle to advance the entire legislative agenda of the hard right. In essence, they have made crisis governance the new normal -- but they did so incrementally. Like frogs in the proverbial pot, many journalists have slowly acclimated to these extreme, democracy-suffocating circumstances and now seem incapable of describing what's they're seeing." Holland provides examples. An excellent piece. ...
... The Washington Post has links to a bunch of shutdown impact stories here. ...
... The Post is liveblogging developments. ...
... Steve Inskeep of NPR interviewed President Obama on Monday. NPR released the interview this morning. The transcript is here:
... CW: Inskeep repeatedly asks stupid questions. He is insistent that President Obama find some way to "negotiate" with House Republicans. ...
... Here's the New York Times story, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy Peters, on the debacle. ...
... Tea Party Republicans like Michele Bachmann are boasting they got what they wanted. Really? As most of the government shuts down because attempts to defund Obamacare, ObamaCare goes live. The "health insurance marketplace" is now open at Healthcare.gov.
President Obama releases a message to U.S. troops:
Midnight. The Tea Party got exactly what they have wanted all along -- no government and they continue to be paid. The Senate has recessed till 9:30 am ET. Reid said, in effect, he would just table whatever baloney the House sent over, unless it was a clean bill. Rachel Maddow heard the House was going to have some vote on something. ...
... CW: MSNBC is reporting that probably a majority of House Republicans would vote for a clean continuing resolution.* If that is correct, it means that the "Hastert Rule" is out; the House is now operating on the "Boehner Rule" -- a bill will not be brought to the floor unless a minority of the majority approves of it. If Boehner had done what a probable majority of his caucus wanted & brought a clean CR to the floor, it would have passed easily. So this entire fiasco, it is important to realize, is the product of John Boehner's desire to keep his speaker's salary. It certainly isn't about his keeping his power because he has already ceded that to the Crazy Cruz Caucus. ...
... * Update: perhaps MSNBC based its speculation on this report by conservative Byron York of the Washington Examiner: "There are 233 Republicans in the House. Insiders estimate that three-quarters of them, or about 175 GOP lawmakers, are willing, and perhaps even eager, to vote for a continuing resolution that funds the government without pressing the Republican goal of defunding or delaying Obamacare. On the other side, insiders estimate about 30 House Republicans believe strongly that Obamacare is such a far-reaching and harmful law that the GOP should do everything it can --- everything --- to stop it or slow it down." CW: Got that? John Boehner let 30 crazed ideologues shut down the government so he could keep his job. ...
... Lori Montgomery & Paul Kane of the Washington Post: "Hours before a midnight deadline, the Republican House voted 228 to 201 to pass its third proposal in two weeks to fund the government. Like the previous plans, it sought to undermine the Affordable Care Act, this time by delaying enforcement of the 'individual mandate,' a cornerstone of the law that requires all Americans to obtain health insurance. The new measure also sought to strip lawmakers and their aides of long-standing government health benefits. The Democratic Senate quickly rejected that plan on a party-line vote of 54 to 46." ...
... President Obama spoke about the federal government shutdown, which will begin at midnight September 30. He didn't mince words:
... The New York Times is liveblogging developments re: the shutdown. ...
... Austin Wright of Politico: "President Barack Obama plans to sign a last-minute bill authorizing paychecks for troops and some Defense Department workers and contractors if the government shuts down, the White House said Monday. The House-passed bill to ensure the military is paid was approved without dissent in the Senate on Monday -- a rare bipartisan agreement as Congress stumbled toward midnight when the fiscal year ends and current appropriations expire." ...
... "Plan C." Jake Sherman & John Bresnahan of Politico: "With just hours to go until the government shuts down, House Republicans will try to pass a bill that would delay the mandate that individuals buy health insurance and would cancel health-insurance subsidies for members of Congress and staff, the president and administration appointees.... Those provisions would be attached to a government-funding bill, which will almost certainly be rejected by the Senate, since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has said he wouldn't accept changes to Obamacare in the government funding negotiations." ...
... Ezra Klein: "John Boehner's 'Plan C' hurts Congress, hurts taxpayers, fixes nothing." ...
... Ginger Gibson of Politico: "House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Monday offered Speaker John Boehner the needed votes from her caucus to passed the continuing resolution that has already cleared the Senate. It is a compromise by Democrats, she argued. It isn't a surprising move by the California Democrat, who has so far refused to officially accept the $986 billion funding levels in the Senate-passed version of the bill. There was little doubt, however, that if called upon Pelosi would have been able to deliver the votes." ...
... Jackie Calmes of the New York Times: "On what was shaping up as a Monday to remember at the White House, President Obama was alternately spectator and actor on three different issues that could define his legacy: the budget, health care and Middle East peace." ...
... Stephen Collinson of the AP: "President Barack Obama promised Benjamin Netanyahu Monday he would enter talks with Iran with clear eyes and demand verifiable concessions, following the Israeli leader's warnings about 'sweet talk' from the Islamic Republic." ...
... Peter Steinhauser of CNN: "According to [a CNN/ORC] survey, just 10% of Americans say they approve of the job Congress is doing, an all-time low in a CNN poll. And 87% say they disapprove of the job federal lawmakers are doing, higher than it's ever been in CNN polling.... While Americans' perception of the job Congress is doing has taken a hit, President Barack Obama's approval rating -- well under 50% -- has remained steady since earlier in the month....The unfavorable numbers for the tea party movement are also at an all-time high in CNN surveys." ...
... Looks like the denizens of Right Wing World are trying to minimize the impact of their sabotage. The National Review has one post titled, "Not Really a Shutdown; Most Services Keep Going," and the subhead under another is "The debate over the government shutdown should acknowledge its limited effects." ...
... MEANWHILE, here's the thinking at the right-wing American Spectator. Jed Babbin: "There's only one solution, and Republicans are stumbling toward it: let the government shut down for a few days, weeks or months in order to force Obama to the bargaining table and into a real compromise in which he has to give up something important such as Obamacare funding." And Robert McCain writes, "Liberal 'shutdown' rhetoric ignores the irresponsibility of Democrats." under the headline -- with a picture of President Obama & Harry Reid -- "Extremely Extreme Extremists." ...
... Update: Fox "News" is slugging this as a "Partial Government Shutdown."
Thanks to Kate M.
... CW: An example of biased poll reporting. CNN Political Unit: "Less than one in five Americans say their families will be better off under the new health care law, according to a new poll." That's the lede. Yeah, they're the "Political Unit," all right. The Tea Party wing of it. Halfway down the page, the reader learns, "... 36% say they won't benefit from the new law but other families will. If you add to that the 17% who believe Obamacare will help them personally, the survey indicates that most Americans see some good coming from it. Some 37% say no one in the country will benefit from the measure." What this poll means, roughly, is that only 17 percent of Americans believe they may need coverage for a pre-existing condition, or think they will get sick & need health insurance but can't otherwise afford it, or want to keep their college kids on their family policy, or don't already get government-backed health insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, V.A.), or have a vague knowledge of the beneficial provisions of the new healthcare law or even know the law exists (something like 33 percent of Americans, I read elsewhere, think the Supreme Court struck down ObamaCare or Congress repealed it) or never watch Fox "News." None of this takes into account the many indirect benefits the rest of us get when others are able to get health insurance & proper medical care. ...
... Update: The Hill reporting on this poll is even worse. The headline: "Less than one in five say ObamaCare will help." The reporter, Rebecca Shabad, doesn't even bother to include the mitigating data cited in the CNN report.
See yesterday's Comments re: the following: