The Commentariat -- Oct. 7, 2013
Justin Sink of the Hill: "President Obama dared Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Monday to prove there aren't enough votes in the House to pass a 'clean' bill to reopen the government. 'The House should hold that vote today,' Obama said during a visit to the Federal Emergency Management Agency on Monday. 'If Republicans and Speaker Boehner are saying there are not enough votes, they should prove it.'" Thanks to James S. for the link:
Speaker Boehner has a credibility problem. From refusing to let the House vote on a bill that was his idea in the first place, to decrying health care subsidies for members of Congress and staff that he worked for months to preserve, to stating that the House doesn't have the votes to pass a clean C.R. at current spending levels, there is now a consistent pattern of Speaker Boehner saying things that fly in the face of the facts or stand at odds with his past actions. -- Adam Jentleson, spokesman for Harry Reid
... The above is from the New York Times, which is liveblogging developments. ...
... NEW. Ken Cirilli of Politico: "The Obama administration would be open to a bill that boosts the debt ceiling for a few weeks, a top White House official said on Monday... National Economic Council Director Gene Sperling said that how much to raise the debt ceiling is up to Congress and that the administration would prefer a longer term solution." ...
... Igor Volsky of Think Progress: "House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said the nation would default on its debt later this month if President Obama does not agree to GOP's demands to cut spending and change parts of the Affordable Care Act. Appearing on ABC's This Week on Sunday, Boehner agreed that the risks of failing to raise the debt ceiling would be 'catastrophic,' leading credit markets to freeze, the dollar to lose its value, and interest rates to skyrocket." For those of you who can stomach it, here's the full interview. Stephanopoulos, for once, did a fairly good job (within the limits of his capabilities -- he let Boehner get away with claiming several times that often in the past, "debt limits have been used to force big policy changes," an assertion that is untrue). It's quite a spectacle:
... The transcript of the interview is here. ...
... Greg Sargent: "A lot of folks have been willing to accept Boehner's demand for 'negotiations' at face value. But let's be clear on what he is really asking for here. Boehner is actually ruling out any negotiations in which Republicans don’t enjoy the leverage that the threat of a massive economic meltdown confers upon them. And he's also saying Republicans will make no concessions of their own in them." CW: This concept is very, very hard for the Village People, not to mention ordinary people, to understand. Boehner is counting on that; indeed, he may not understand it himself. After years of using this tactic, he may think extortion & negotiation are synonymous. ...
... Justin Sink of the Hill: "The White House on Sunday challenged Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to prove his assertion in an ABC News interview that "there are not the votes in the House" to pass a "clean" continuing resolution. 'If he's right, why not prove it?" White House press secretary Jay Carney asked on Twitter."
... CW: Twitter? C'mon. President Obama must address the nation from the Oval Office about this Constitutional crisis. Treating Congressional sabotage like a political game played out on TV talk shows & Twitter trivializes the seriousness of the situation & demeans the President's efforts to preserve Constitutional norms. ...
... Bob Scheiffer practices journalism, & Ted Cruz's fellow Texas Senator, John Cornyn (R), can't respond with anything but his assigned talking points. Via Jack Beauchamp of Think Progress:
... Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi: "[Saturday], 200 Members of the House Democratic Caucus, led by Congressmen Timothy H. Bishop and Patrick Murphy, sent a letter to Speaker John Boehner demanding a vote on behalf of the American people on the Senate-passed continuing resolution, which would reopen government and end the detrimental, five day long Republican Government Shutdown. The letter, which is signed by 195 voting Members and 5 non-voting delegates, makes clear that there is a bipartisan majority to pass this bill and reopen government now." ...
... Aaron Blake of the Washington Post: "Combine those 195 Democrats with the 22 House Republicans who have signaled support for a clean resolution, and you get 217 members, which is a bare majority of the chamber's 432 members." ...
... AND/BUT. Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the leading critic of the Ted Cruz Plan, told Chris Wallace of Fox "News" Sunday that "he would not join Democrats to bring up a clean continuing resolution on the House floor for a vote." Too bad. Thanks to Jeanne B. for the link. ...
... CW: I didn't realize how bare the bare majority is. Remove Peter King & Co. & it isn't a majority at all. Call me a cockeyed optimist, but I think much of Boehner's belligerent interview was a coded cry for help from the Not-So-Crazies. He wants that discharge petition. ...
... AP: "Maryland's Rep. Steny Hoyer, [the House Minority Whip,] says he believes 140 to 160 of the 232 House Republicans 'think what's being done right now is irrational.' Hoyer tells MSNBC Monday these lawmakers are 'looking over their shoulders' at potential tea party challenges." ...
It is a concession, I acknowledge that. -- Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), speaking of the continuing resolution Democrats have agreed to pass
... Vicki Needham of the Hill: Shadow House Speaker "Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Sunday said changes to President Obama's signature healthcare law should be tied to a debt ceiling increase." ...
... Tom Hamburger & Matea Gold of the Washington Post: "The growing unhappiness among longtime GOP check-writers and party elders underscores the deepening divisions over the ascendant tea party wing, which fueled this past week's shutdown and is demanding Democratic concessions in exchange for reopening the government and raising the nation's debt limit.... The frustration was evident this past week not just at [an American] Crossroads conference but also throughout the party's high-end donor class. While grass-roots activists cheer the unyielding positions of conservative House Republicans, some of the GOP’s top fundraisers are watching the situation with growing dismay.... It is too early to tell whether the discontent will seriously hamper fundraising for party committees and independent groups such as Crossroads. Some top GOP fundraisers said they think donors upset with the strategy will still write checks in the end." ...
... ** MAG & others recommend this excellent piece by Jonathan Chait, published Friday: "To weaponize the debt ceiling, you must be willing to inflict harm on millions of innocent people. It is a shockingly powerful self-destruct button built into our very system of government, but only useful for the most ideologically hardened or borderline sociopathic. But it turns out to be the perfect tool for the contemporary GOP: a party large enough to control a chamber of Congress yet too small to win the presidency, and infused with a dangerous, millenarian combination of overheated Randian paranoia and fully justified fear of adverse demographic trends." Read the whole thing; he has a lot more to say about the inherent flaw in our Constitutional form of government. ...
... Paul Campos, in Lawyers, Guns & Money, likes Chait's parenthetical observation, "Obama could, theoretically, threaten to veto a debt ceiling hike unless Congress attaches it to the creation of single-payer health insurance." ...
... CW: What Chait fails to mention is the third branch of government -- the courts. Would that we had a responsible, pragmatic Supreme Court instead of one that springs from & enables the radical fringe, the President, I believe, could declare a Constitutional crisis & open up the government for business again under a fiscally conservative resolution as well as raise the debt ceiling. ...
... OR, as James S. suggests, the FBI could just cuff the Congressional teabaggers. As the Greek government has done to its far-right party, the DOJ could charge the RTPs with being part of a criminal organization. And, please, could we see Ted Cruz doing the perp walk? (Not serious here, of course, but it's a lovely thought.) ...
... ** Paul Krugman: "Conservative leaders are indeed ideologically extreme, but they're also deeply incompetent. So much so, in fact, that the Dunning-Kruger effect -- the truly incompetent can’t even recognize their own incompetence -- reigns supreme.... Sooner or later, the party’s attitude toward policy -- we listen only to people who tell us what we want to hear, and attack the bearers of uncomfortable news -- was bound to infect political strategy, too." CW: this is an expansion of a Krugman blogpost I linked the other day. Today's column is well-worth a read even if you read the post. ...
... Lori Montgomery of the Washington Post provides a perfect example of the kind of "balanced" reporting. Krugman derides. ...
... AND an unnamed House Republican backs up Krugman's assertion that House leaders have no idea what they're doing. Byron York of the Washington Examiner reports: "What became clear after an hour of discussion was that the House Republican leadership's position at the moment is the result of happenstance, blundering, and a continuing inability to understand the priorities of both GOP and Democratic colleagues." ...
... E. J. Dionne: "We now know that the tea party is primarily about postures aimed at undercutting sensible governance and premised on the delusion that Obama's election victories were meaningless. Its leaders abandon these postures as soon as their adversaries stand strong and the poll-testers report their approach is failing. This will give pause to anyone ever again tempted to follow them into a cul-de-sac." CW: I think Dionne's report of the death of the Tea Party is premature, & I don't see how the Tea Party's destructive agenda is the breaking news Dionne suggests it is, but his column is worth a read, if only for his evisceration of Li'l Randy. ...
... Margaret Talbot of the New Yorker: "If Obama refuses to back down, this could be a moment that will define his legacy -- a fight for democracy as much as for Democrats." ...
... ** Apocalypse Soon. Yalman Onaran of Bloomberg, in a straight news report: "A U.S. government default, just weeks away if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling as it now threatens to do, will be an economic calamity like none the world has ever seen. Failure by the world's largest borrower to pay its debt -- unprecedented in modern history -- will devastate stock markets from Brazil to Zurich, halt a $5 trillion lending mechanism for investors who rely on Treasuries, blow up borrowing costs for billions of people and companies, ravage the dollar and throw the U.S. and world economies into a recession that probably would become a depression. Among the dozens of money managers, economists, bankers, traders and former government officials interviewed for this story, few view a U.S. default as anything but a financial apocalypse." ...
... This Apocalypse Brought to You Live! by Fox "News." Jonathan Bernstein in Salon: "What all these [disparate Republican] talking points had in common ... is that they were eagerly snarfed up by the folks at Fox News and other parts of the Republican-aligned press. The truth is that Republicans can pretty much say whatever they want, no matter what the bizarre logic and no matter what connection it has to what they were saying five minutes ago, and Fox News will totally accept it and blast it for hours or days. The result? Republicans have become incredibly lazy. After all, why bother constructing a coherent argument if you don't need one.... It's easy for Republican politicians to fall deep within an information feedback loop, not even realizing that what everyone within that loop is excited about is unpopular, or perhaps just irrelevant, to the other 80 percent or so of the nation. Or to put it another way: Benghazi!" Thanks to Jeanne B. for the link. ...
... Brian Beutler of Salon highlights the incoherence of the GOP "strategy": "The GOP’s current position ... boils down to to the laughable idea that nothing's more important than reopening federal monuments, funding clinical trials, and spending money on veterans services for two weeks, until we breach the debt limit and they have to be shut down again." CW: Beutler seems gobsmacked that Republicans don't know what they're doing, but Bernstein (above) provides a pretty good explanation of why they're so "clueless," as Beutler writes. Also thanks to Jeanne B.
Adam Liptak of the New York Times weighs in on the Supreme Court's consequential new term, which begins today. ...
... Justice Antonin Scalia weighs in on everything. Don't have time to read it, but I'm sure the interview, by Jennifer Senior for New York magazine, is full of stuff to make you want to rend your garments or something. ...
... NEW. The HuffPost factchecks Scalia. ...
... Robert Barnes of the Washington Post begins & ends his magazine piece on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a discussion of her fondness for opera (and how a good production of a sad operatic story makes her cry). CW: Well, she's a girl; what do you expect? No mention of her "mean beef stroganoff" of course because, as Barnes points out, Ginsburg can't cook. We hear from Scalia here, too. Nice touch.
Dr. Feelgood Runs FDA Painkiller Safety Tests. Peter Whorisky of the Washington Post: "A scientific panel that shaped the federal government's policy for testing the safety and effectiveness of painkillers was funded by major pharmaceutical companies that paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for the chance to affect the thinking of the Food and Drug Administration. E-mails show that the companies paid as much as $25,000 to attend any given meeting of the panel, which had been set up by two academics to provide advice to the FDA on how to weigh the evidence from clinical trials.... FDA officials who regulate painkillers sat on the steering committee of the panel, which met in private, and co-wrote papers with employees of pharmaceutical companies." CW: Reminds me of self-certified opthamologist Dr. Randy.
Senatorial Race
CW: You thought Scott Brown was a disaster? Ha! Michael Barbaro of the New York Times: Cory "Booker's bumpy campaign [for New Jersey's open U.S. Senate seat] and shrinking lead in the polls are all the more unsettling to Democratic Party officials because [GOP nominee Steve] Lonegan is a political anomaly in the blue-hued state: a Tea Party conservative who describes himself as a 'radical,' opposes abortion even in cases of rape and incest, cheers the current shutdown of the federal government and has relied on polarizing right-wing figures like Sarah Palin and Rick Perry as campaign surrogates." Voters who are skeptical of Booker have every reason to be, IMHO, but no reason to vote for Lonegan. The election is next week.
News Ledes
AP: "Americans James Rothman and Randy Schekman and German-born researcher Thomas Suedhof won the 2013 Nobel Prize in medicine on Monday for discoveries on how hormones, enzymes and other key substances are transported within cells."
AFP: "Secretary of State John Kerry on Monday insisted the capture of an alleged Al-Qaeda operative in Libya in a US raid was legal, after Tripoli demanded answers about the 'kidnap'. Abu Anas al-Libi, who was indicted in connection with the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and has a $5 million FBI bounty on his head, was captured on Saturday."
Danbury, Conn., News Times: " Voters turned out Saturday to accept a $49.25 million state appropriation to demolish Sandy Hook Elementary School and design and construct a new school on the Dickinson Drive site. The state money will also fund buying two parcels of adjacent land for a new entrance to the school. The vote was 4,504 yes to 558 no." Via New York.