The Conversation -- May 31, 2025
Wait. Who's Vicious? Ty Roush of Forbes: “... Donald Trump on Friday said not to 'feel so sorry' for former President Joe Biden, who announced a cancer diagnosis earlier this month, and criticized Biden as 'vicious' — just over a week after Trump and other Republicans suggested Biden may have hidden his illness from the public. Trump, who spoke in the Oval Office on Friday..., [said,] '[Biden’s] been a sort of moderate person over his lifetime.... Not a smart person, but a somewhat vicious person, I will say. If you feel sorry for him, don't feel so sorry, because he's vicious. What he did with his political opponent and all of the people that he hurt — he hurt a lot of people, Biden, so I really don't feel sorry for him.'” Thanks to Akhilleus for the link. See also his commentary below.
~~~~~~~~~~
This is a gangster state.... This is not basically a legitimate government that is sometimes doing corrupt things. This is an essentially corrupt enterprise.... Every day they get up and try to figure out how to plunder and pillage the people.... The criminals at this point are basically in charge of every department and agency. -- Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), Friday
Dana Milbank of the Washington Post: “... Trump’s mass deportations haven’t happened, and his administration has accumulated an astonishing record of losses in federal courts as judges appointed by presidents from both parties reject his attempt at governing by fiat. What remains is the wreckage: a loss of faith in U.S. credit, reflected in what the Brits are calling a 'moron premium' that the markets are imposing on Trump, which is pushing up bond yields and interest rates; a generation of talent departing the federal government; a loss of goodwill among foreign partners that would take years to rebuild, if it can be rebuilt at all; and the devastation of the scientific research at American universities that has long powered the American economy.... Likewise, the Russian government is now mocking Trump.... During the Biden years, Trump liked to say that 'the world is laughing at us.' Now it really is.... He continues to diminish his office in ways large and small.... The good news is more and more Americans are summoning the courage to fight back.” This is a gift link. (Also linked yesterday.)
Rachel Lerman of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump said Friday that he planned to double tariffs on steel imports into the U.S. from 25 percent to 50 percent. Speaking at a rally at U.S. Steel in Pennsylvania, Trump said the raised tariff rate would 'even further secure the steel industry in the United States.' Trump traveled to speak to steelworkers after announcing a 'partnership' last week between the storied U.S. company and Japanese rival Nippon Steel. The increased tariff rate will take effect Wednesday, Trump said in a Truth Social post Friday evening after the event. The president’s actions are designed to promote greater domestic steel industry production and employment. But they also increase costs for manufacturers that use the industrial metals to produce goods such as automobiles and appliances, as well as other sectors including housing and construction.” The AP report is here.
Are You Feeling His Pain? David Bauder of the AP: “... Donald Trump suffered 'mental anguish' from CBS News’ editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with Democratic opponent Kamala Harris last fall, his lawyers are arguing in court papers. Trump’s status as a 'content creator' was also damaged by attention given to the interview, lawyers said. It was part of their argument opposing CBS parent Paramount Global’s effort to dismiss the president’s $20 billion lawsuit against the company, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas. Trump has claimed the editing was done to advantage Harris, which CBS rejects. Even with the effort to dismiss the case, Paramount is engaged in settlement discussions with Trump. The prospect of a settlement has so rattled CBS News that two of its top executives have resigned in protest.” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ As Sam Stein & William Saletan of the Bulwark discussed here, the anguished Trump has filed what is less a lawsuit and more of a shakedown. Trump expects a kickback before he allows Paramount to complete its planned merger with Skydance. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Max Tani of Semafor: "The California State Senate has invited two former top CBS figures [-- former 60 Minutes producer Bill Owens and former CBS News president Wendy McMahon --] to testify in a new inquiry into whether the network’s parent company has violated state laws against bribery and unfair competition. Paramount offered ... Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign $15 million to settle a lawsuit filed against CBS over a lightly edited interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris in October, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week. Trump refused the settlement, threatening to file an additional suit against the company, seeking federal approval for its merger with entertainment company Skydance. The settlement talks have infuriated many staff members at CBS as well as many national Democrats who believe that Paramount is caving to pressure from Trump to settle a frivolous lawsuit."
Evan Hurst of Wonkette republishes in full Trump's bonkers complaint about judges and Leonard Leo & the Federalist society, blah blah. Trump ends the long rant with a standard business-letter closing, which is just comically out of place here: "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Hurst calls Trump "the weakest dictator ever." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Charlie Savage of the New York Times: Donald “Trump appears to be declaring independence from outside constraints on how he nominates judges, signaling that he is looking for loyalists who will uphold his agenda and denouncing the conservative legal network that helped him remake the federal judiciary in his first term. Late Thursday, after a ruling struck down his tariffs on most imported goods, Mr. Trump attacked the Federalist Society, leaders of which heavily influenced his selection of judges during his first presidency.... Hours earlier Thursday, the Justice Department severely undercut the traditional role of the American Bar Association in vetting judicial nominees. A day before, Mr. Trump picked a loyalist [-- his former defense lawyer Emil Bove --] who has no deep ties to the conservative legal movement for a life-tenured appeals court seat, explaining that his pick could be counted on to rule in ways aligned with his agenda.... [Mr. Bove] has shown a willingness to aggressively use power in ways that Mr. Trump likes, including carrying out politically charged purges.”
Tyler Pager of the New York Times: Donald “Trump gave Elon Musk a formal send-off on Friday after one of the most tumultuous experiments in modern American governance, in which the world’s richest man had free rein to slash the federal work force. After roughly four months leading the Department of Government Efficiency, Mr. Musk ended up with a bruised reputation and a literal black eye.... 'Elon’s service to America has been without comparison in modern history,' Mr. Trump said, giving him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia.... And while DOGE has not come close to delivering the $1 trillion in savings that Mr. Musk promised, he has racked up significant personal benefit in recent months — including having his allies chosen to run NASA and the Air Force, two key customers for his SpaceX company. In the Oval Office on Friday, Mr. Trump praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced,' and said Mr. Musk would continue to advise the administration on cutting costs.... Mr. Musk has faced increasing scrutiny over his personal life, particularly over his drug use and his tumultuous relationships with the mothers of his many children.” ~~~
~~~ Marie: I don't think it's a “formal send-off” if the honoree shows up wearing a billed cap (inappropriate in most indoor settings) and T-shirt (inappropriate in the Oval Office where Republicans were horrified that President Obama took his jacket off when working at the Resolute desk), both emblazoned with slogans, even if Musk did stop to praise the “majesty” of the Rococo ormolu-slathered plaster geegaws & appliques posted and pasted all over a room that is supposed to reflect a refined Federal style based on ancient Greek & Roman ideal proportions. ~~~
~~~ Shawn McCreesh of the New York Times: “It was like metaphor turned reality. After 130 days spent fighting the federal government, Elon Musk turned up with a black eye at the White House on Friday for his last day as a 'special government employee.'... His right eye socket was puffy and empurpled. No doubt about it, that was a big, fat shiner. His project in Washington more or less finished, he never came close to cutting the $1 trillion from the federal government he had promised. His businesses and his public image got somewhat battered, and now, apparently, so had his face. Did somebody beat him up? The list of possible suspects seemed long. An abridged lineup of people and constituencies currently unhappy with Mr. Musk includes: at least two of the many women with whom he has fathered children; pretty much the entire federal bureaucracy; his neighbors in a suburb of Austin, Texas; Tesla shareholders; old friends of his; Republicans on Capitol Hill; his 20-year-old daughter; all those people who have lit Teslas on fire; and even some Trump voters.” Musk claimed his son X had punched him when they were “horsing around.” The Independent's story is here. MB: Musk's explanation is as believable as “I ran into a door.” If you think the kid did it, then you don't believe a word of this NYT story about Musk's drug abuse/habit. ~~~
~~~ Heather Cox Richardson has some thoughts on Musk's tenure, which she backs up with some analysis by others. (Richardson does not exactly link her sources, though she provides sorta-footnotes [unnumbered with no mechanism to coordinate them with her text], and most of those include links. But my experience is that the notes at the bottom of her posts don't include links to all of her references in the body of her post. Since everybody else who writes on Substack knows how to link their citations, Richardson, who is a scholar, should be able to figure it out, too.)
Janay Kingsberry & Maura Judkis of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump announced Friday that he has fired the director of the National Portrait Gallery, Kim Sajet, whom he called 'highly partisan.'... 'Upon the request and recommendation of many people, I am herby terminating the employment of Kim Sajet as Director of the National Portrait Gallery,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform Truth Social. 'She is a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position. Her replacement will be named shortly.' It is unclear if the president has authority to dismiss Sajet. The Smithsonian’s programming is not under the purview of the executive branch, and personnel decisions for senior-level Smithsonian museum positions are made by Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III.... As director, Sajet has focused on diversifying the gallery’s collection and programming by acquiring works that reflected a broader range of artists and subjects and integrating Spanish into the museum’s communications strategy.” (Also linked yesterday.) The Raw Story's report is here. ~~~
~~~ Marie: Fight for your job, Ms. Sajet. Everybody's doing it.
~~~ Tierney Sneed of CNN: “... Donald Trump’s directives for mass firings at multiple agencies will remain on hold, a federal appeals court ruled Friday evening. The Trump administration had asked the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to freeze a lower court’s order that halted the terminations at more than a dozen agencies. The new order is a major setback for Trump in his efforts to drastically shrink the federal government. His plans for the sweeping layoffs – known as reductions in force, or RIFs – have been on hold since May 9, after US District Judge Susan Illston ruled that Trump could not do such a dramatic overhaul of federal agencies without congressional authorization. In its 2-1 opinion, the 9th Circuit panel said the Trump executive order at issue in the case 'far exceeds the President’s supervisory powers under the Constitution.' The majority concluded that the challengers were likely to succeed on the merits of their arguments that the mass layoffs were unlawful and said the administration failed to meet the other factors that would have justified the emergency appellate intervention. Trump already once asked the Supreme Court to get involved in the case – a request that initially went nowhere – and it is likely the dispute will eventually reach the high court again.”
Marie: I meant to check on the Trump-Powell meeting, but I forgot: ~~~
~~~ Who's the “Major Loser” Now, Donald? Erkki Forster of the Daily Beast, republished by Yahoo! News (May 29): “Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell threw cold water on ... Donald Trump’s attempt to sway the Fed into cutting interest rates during a rare face-to-face meeting Thursday. Trump invited the Fed chair to the White House for their first meeting of his second term to ramp up the pressure on Powell to slash rates. But Powell — whom Trump has called a 'major loser' for refusing to bend to his will — rebuffed him. According to a Fed statement, Powell told Trump that he will make monetary policy decisions 'based solely on careful, objective, and non-political analysis.'... The Supreme Court noted last week that Trump cannot legally remove Powell, whose term ends in 2026, leaving the president to vent on his Truth Social account....”
Jeff Stein of the Washington Post: “The top attorney for the White House Office of Management and Budget on Friday sharply rebuked a congressional watchdog, escalating an ongoing battle over the administration’s expansion of unilateral spending powers. The Government Accountability Office, a federal watchdog that’s part of the legislative branch, said this month that the administration broke federal law in canceling spending for a $5 billion electric vehicle program without congressional approval. Gene L. Dodaro, the U.S. comptroller general and head of the GAO, has also said during congressional testimony that his office had opened nearly 40 separate investigations into the administration, apparently focused on spending cuts.... The U.S. DOGE Service, led up until Friday by billionaire Elon Musk, has claimed more than $100 billion in spending cuts, much of it done without congressional approval, triggering probes by the GAO.... In a new letter Friday, however, Mark Paoletta, general counsel for the White House budget office, said that the administration would reduce its level of cooperation with the watchdog’s investigations and that its actions on spending have been in 'full compliance' with federal budget law. The GAO’s requests are 'costly to the taxpayer' and divert 'significant agency resources' from the budget office, Paoletta wrote.”
Sophia Cai & Megan Messerly of Politico: “The Trump administration is escalating its campaign against Harvard University — and looking for new ways to bring the storied institution to heel. The White House convened officials from nearly a dozen agencies on Wednesday to brainstorm additional punitive measures.... The administration official said that forthcoming actions are expected from the State, Treasury, Health and Human Services and Justice departments, among others, and could happen as early as next month. The push comes as the White House regroups after a federal judge blocked its move to bar Harvard from enrolling international students, and underscores how ... Dona[l]d Trump has grown increasingly invested in the battle. Even as some in the administration privately grouse that the aggressive posture is allowing Harvard to win public sympathy, Trump has kept up the attacks, threatening in a post last week to revoke its tax exempt status and chastising Harvard again Wednesday during an unrelated press conference.”
As Donald Trump models himself after a feudal king, there are a number of aspects to his regency that would take us back to medieval times. For instance ... ~~~
~~~ James Glanz of the New York Times: “As the Trump administration moves with abandon to deny visas, expel foreign students and slash spending on research, scientists in the United States are becoming increasingly alarmed. The global supremacy that the United States has long enjoyed in health, biology, the physical sciences and other fields, they warn, may be coming to an end.... Research cuts and moves to curtail the presence of foreign students by the Trump administration have happened at a dizzying pace.... Dirk Brockmann, a biology and physics professor in Germany, warned that there were much broader implications. The acceptance of risk and seemingly crazy leaps of inspiration woven into American attitudes, he said, help produce a research environment that nowhere else can quite match. The result has been decades of innovation, economic growth and military advances.... Many foreign governments, from France to Australia, have also started openly courting American scientists. But because the United States has led the field for so long, there is deep concern that research globally will suffer.”
Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars. -- Kristi Noem, in a false claim against a man named Ramon Morales Reyes ~~~
~~~ Mike Balsamo, et al., of the AP: “A claim by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem that an immigrant threatened the life of ... Donald Trump has begun to unravel [quickly]. Noem announced an arrest of a 54-year-old man who was living in the U.S. illegally, saying he had written a letter threatening to kill Trump and would then return to Mexico. The story received a flood of media attention and was highlighted by the White House and Trump’s allies. But investigators actually believe the man may have been framed so that he would get arrested and be deported from the U.S. before he got a chance to testify in a trial as a victim of assault, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.... Law enforcement officials believe the man, Ramon Morales Reyes, never wrote a letter that Noem and her department shared.... Noem also shared the letter on X along with a photo of Morales Reyes, and the White House also shared it on its social media accounts.... It’s not clear why Homeland Security officials still decided to send a [press] release [claiming Morales Reyes had threatened Trump after determining the claim was false]. ~~~
~~~ Marie: The reporting is a bit unclear, but it suggests that the threatening letter was written in English. Not only does Morales Reyes not speak English, he also cannot write in Spanish. AND a handwriting sample obtained from Morales Reyes did not match the handwriting in the letter. I don't know, maybe Kristi donned a fetching serape and a sombrero, sat down at a desk and wrote the letter herself.
Another Suspicious “Administrative Error.” Mattathias Schwartz & Alan Feuer of the New York Times: “The Trump administration deported a 31-year-old Salvadoran man minutes after a federal appeals court barred his removal while his case proceeded, the government admitted in a court filing this week. In its filing, the government denied that it had violated the order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, instead blaming 'a confluence of administrative errors.' The filing argues that because the process of deporting the man, Jordin Melgar-Salmeron, had already started before the court issued its formal order, at 9:52 a.m. May 7, that meant the order had not been violated. The plane carrying Mr. Melgar-Salmeron to El Salvador did not take off from Alexandria, La., until 10:20 a.m. Eastern time, according to the government’s timeline. The government had also previously given the court what the judges called 'express assurance' that it would not schedule a deportation for him until the next day.... In at least three other deportation cases, federal judges have determined that Trump officials expelled people from the country in violation of standing court orders.” Politico's report, by Kyle Cheney, is here.
Hamed Aleaziz, et al., of the New York Times: “... an aggressive new initiative by Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain migrants at immigration courts [is] the latest escalation by the Trump administration in its all-out effort to ramp up deportations. Agents have begun arresting migrants immediately after their hearings if they have been ordered deported or their cases have been dismissed, a move that enables their swift removal, according to immigration lawyers and internal documents obtained by The New York Times. The operations, which have taken place across the country in the past week, have required a high level of coordination between the government lawyers in the courtrooms and the ICE officers waiting to make the arrests, according to the documents. The tactic is a significant break from past practice, when immigration officials largely steered clear of courthouse arrests out of concern that they would deter people from complying with orders. Critics, including some former homeland security officials, say the practice is deceptive and could backfire. 'Arresting people there subverts the legal process and will make others too scared to show up in the future, ultimately pushing people further into the shadows and out of legal status,' said Deborah Fleischaker, a senior ICE official during the Biden administration.” ~~~
~~~ Marie: Again, bear in mind that those being arrested are not The “rapists,” “savages,” “monsters” and “the worst of the worst” people Trump claims he is deporting to keep the rest of us safe. Rather, they are generally the sort of law-abiding individuals whom you would expect to show up for court dates. ~~~
~~~ Arya Sundaram of the Gothamist: “In a dramatic incident captured on video, U.S. Department of Homeland Security police Wednesday handcuffed one of Rep. Jerry Nadler [D-NY] aides in the congressmember's Manhattan office, which is in the same federal office building as an immigration courthouse.... In the video..., DHS officers entered Nadler’s district office and accused staff members of 'harboring rioters.' A Nadler staffer is seen crying and being handcuffed. Another officer is at a door trying to enter a private area of the office while a staffer asks for a warrant. DHS later said in a statement that 'one individual' — the woman seen being handcuffed — had blocked police from performing a security check they intended to do based on information there were protesters in the lawmaker’s office.... The staff member was not arrested and not charged with any crime.... Two people who were at the courthouse to monitor ICE activity said the confrontation came after ICE officers threatened to arrest them and other advocates, and a Nadler staffer invited the advocates inside.”
Devlin Barrett of the New York Times: “Some [counterintelligence experts] see the State Department’s plan to revoke visas of some Chinese college students as heavy-handed and counterproductive.... In announcing the move late Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave few specifics, offering only that the U.S. government would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' How that vaguely defined standard will be enforced is not yet clear, but the directive is part of a broad campaign by the Trump administration to force major changes in American higher education.... Some 277,000 students from China attended school in the United States last year, second only to the number of students from India.”
Justin Jouvenal of the Washington Post: “A divided Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way, for now, for the Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of more than 530,000 migrants from four countries who have been allowed to live and work in the United States while their immigration cases play out. The ruling is the second time in recent weeks the high court has given Trump officials permission to terminate programs that protect immigrants fleeing countries wracked by war or economic turmoil. Earlier this month, the court allowed the administration to revoke temporary protections that have allowed nearly 350,000 Venezuelans to live and work in the United States. Legal challenges to each of the Trump administration’s action will continue in lower courts, and could eventually reach the Supreme Court for a full hearing on the merits. For now, the justices are allowing two of the president’s most aggressive moves to deport large numbers of migrants who during the Biden administration had been given permission to live and work in this country after fleeing harsh conditions at home.” At 10:40 am ET Friday, this was a developing story. According to MSNBC, the vote was 7-2, with Elena Kagan voting with the right-wing justices. (Also linked yesterday.) The NBC News report is here.
Sean O'Kane of TechCrunch: “The chief executive of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) says Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency left the nonprofit’s Washington, D.C., headquarters in disarray, full of water damage, rats, and roaches, according to a new sworn statement.... The statement from the executive, George Moose, comes just a few days after a federal judge ruled that DOGE’s takeover of the nonprofit was illegal.... DOGE started its takeover of USIP in mid-March after a standoff that saw the nonprofit call the police on Musk’s government workers. Moose said at the time that DOGE staff had 'broken into' the USIP headquarters in Washington, despite the fact that the nonprofit is not part of the executive branch and isn’t subject to the White House’s whims.”
CDC Contradicts RFKJ. Fenit Nirappil of the Washington Post: “Coronavirus vaccines are still recommended for healthy children if their doctors approve, according to updated immunization schedules published late Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, contradicting Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s announcement earlier this week. The revisions, which also say the vaccines are no longer advised during pregnancy, add to the confusion surrounding the Trump administration’s move to bypass the traditional system for immunization advice through expert review and CDC guidance. The CDC did not remove the coronavirus vaccines from the childhood schedule, as Kennedy said it would, when it updated its website late Thursday. Instead, the agency recommends the shots based on 'shared clinical decision-making,' meaning children can get vaccinated if their parents and doctors agree.” (Also linked yesterday.) The UPI story is here.
Apoorva Mandavilli of the New York Times: “The Trump administration has dealt a sharp blow to work on H.I.V. vaccines, terminating a $258 million program whose work was instrumental to the search for a vaccine. Officials from the H.I.V. division of the National Institutes of Health delivered the news on Friday to the program’s two leaders, at Duke University and the Scripps Research Institute. Both teams were collaborating with numerous other research partners. The work was broadly applicable to a wide range of treatments for other illnesses, from Covid drugs to snake antivenom and therapies for autoimmune diseases. 'The consortia for H.I.V./AIDS vaccine development and immunology was reviewed by N.I.H. leadership, which does not support it moving forward,' said a senior official at the agency.... The program’s elimination is the latest in a series of cuts to H.I.V.-related initiatives, and to prevention of the disease in particular. Separately, the N.I.H. also paused funding for a clinical trial of an H.I.V. vaccine made by Moderna.... The number of new H.I.V. infections had been declining steadily since 2010. Still, in 2023, the World Health Organization reported 1.3 million new cases, including about 120,000 children.” The CBS News report is here. ~~~
~~~ Marie: If this was the only thing you had ever heard about Trump and his administration, you would be justified in condemning the whole bigoted, stupid lot of them.
Brad Plumer of the New York Times: “The Energy Department announced on Friday that it was terminating $3.7 billion in Biden-era awards to companies trying to demonstrate technologies that might one day help tackle global warming. Some of the 24 canceled awards would have gone to industrial companies that were aiming to reduce emissions from cement, iron, glass and chemicals production. Others had been awarded to fossil fuel and cement companies attempting to trap and bury carbon dioxide from their smokestacks before the gas escapes into the atmosphere and heats the planet.... Congress had approved tens of billions of dollars for trials of novel energy technologies as part of the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law.... The Biden administration had worked to award most of those funds before President Trump came into office, including $6 billion for technologies to cut industrial emissions. Many of the awards were legally binding, but they often had conditions attached to them and most of the money has yet to be spent.”
Derek Hawkins of the Washington Post: “A spike in threats against federal judges since ... Donald Trump took office is prompting calls for new funding and security measures, with current and former jurists, lawmakers, and law enforcement officials saying existing protections are not enough. The U.S. Marshals Service investigated 373 separate threats to judges in the first five months of 2025, compared with 509 probes all of last year.... [One] solution, several former judges said, would be for Trump administration officials to cool their rhetoric, which they believe fuels threats from extremists and fanatical supporters. While the White House has denounced violence against judges..., Donald Trump and some of his most powerful allies have continued to use inflammatory language to lambaste those who rule against administration policies. In social media posts Wednesday and Thursday, top Trump adviser Stephen Miller called a federal trade court’s ruling against the president’s tariffs a 'judicial coup' and reposted photos of the three-judge panel, saying, 'we are living under a judicial tyranny.'”
Scott Nover of the Washington Post: “PBS sued the Trump administration Friday, nearly one month after the president issued an executive order targeting its federal funding. In a complaint filed in federal district court in Washington, the public broadcaster alleged that the government violated its First Amendment rights. PBS also said the order unlawfully interfered with the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, which established the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a nonprofit entity that oversees federal funding to PBS and NPR.... PBS was joined in its suit by Northern Minnesota Public Television, a PBS member station.” (Also linked yesterday.) The ABC News story is here.
About That Big, Bad Bill. Andrew Ackerman & Jeff Stein of the Washington Post: “Wall Street bankers and executives are privately warning the Trump administration that the tax bill moving through Congress could stoke investor anxiety about rising deficits, push up U.S. borrowing costs and damage the broader economy, according to more than a dozen people familiar with the matter. House Republicans this month approved a measure projected to add $2.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, primarily by extending tax cuts from 2017 — and it would add more than $5 trillion in debt including interest costs and likely future extensions, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. That legislation, which would also beef up immigration enforcement and defense spending, is ... Donald Trump’s top legislative priority. The Senate is due to take it up soon. But recently, a growing number of figures from the financial world have expressed private concerns that such an expensive bill could rattle the U.S. bond market, a cornerstone of the global financial system and the national economy.”
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Ernst Gets Philosophical about Deep Cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. Alexander Bolton of the Hill: “Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst (R) pushed back against constituents who shouted out at a recent town hall meeting that cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) would cause people to die by responding, 'Well, we’re all going to die.'” MB: The GOP has completely washed its hands of any responsibility to assist with the health and welfare of the people they supposedly serve. So much for their oath to a Constitution that lays out the bedrock principles of the government, among them to “promote the general Welfare.” (Also linked yesterday.) The New York Times report, by Annie Karni, is here.
Adeel Hassan of the New York Times: “Former President Biden said on Friday afternoon that he was feeling good after beginning treatment for an aggressive form of prostate cancer. 'The prognosis is good,' he said.... Mr. Biden spoke to reporters after an event honoring veterans in New Castle, Del., making his first public remarks since May 18, when his office announced his illness and said the cancer had metastasized to the bone. Mr. Biden attended the event, which fell on the 10th anniversary of the death of his son Beau, with Beau’s son, Robert Biden II, who graduated from high school this week. Mr. Biden said that his treatment was 'all a matter of taking a pill, one particular pill.... The expectation is we’re going to be able to beat this,' he said.”
~~~~~~~~~~